Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rethinking peer review in medicine: From trust to transformation Cover

Rethinking peer review in medicine: From trust to transformation

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Rothwell PM, Martyn CN. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? Brain. 2000;123(9):1964–9.
  2. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(4):178–82.
  3. Hopewell S, Boutron I, Altman DG, Ravaud P. The quality of statistical reporting in randomized controlled trials in medical journals: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):e003842.
  4. Wolfram D, Wang P. Evaluating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in peer review: A systematic review. Learned Publishing. 2020;33(1):14–24.
  5. Ross-Hellauer T. What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Res. 2017;6:588.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 205 - 207
Submitted on: Jul 20, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2025
Published on: Jul 31, 2025
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Dan Longrois, Sacha Rozencwaig, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.