References
- Biber, D., Gray, D., Staples, S., and Egbert, J. (2020). Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predicative measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46.
- Crossley, A., S., and McNamara, S., D. (2014). Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, pages 66–79.
- Gerdes, K., Guillaume, B., Kahane, S., Perrier, G. (2018). SUD or Surface-Syntactic Universal Dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD. In Universal Dependencies Workshop.
- Guillaume, B. (2021). Graph Matching and Graph Rewriting: GREW tools for corpus exploration, maintenance and conversion. In Demonstrations – 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL).
- Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, IL, USA: NCTE.
- Jiang, J., and Ouyang, J. (2018). Minimization and Probability Distribution of Dependency Distance in the Process of Second Language Acquisition. In J. Jingyang – H. Liu (eds.): Quantitative Analysis of Dependency Structures. De Gruyter Mouton, pages 167–190.
- Kuiken, F. (2022). Linguistic complexity in second language acquisition. Linguistic Vanguard.
- Mačutek, J., Čech, R., and Courtin, M. (2021). The Menzerath-Altmann law in syntactic structure revisited. In Quasy, SyntaxFest 2021: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (March 21 – 25, 2022). Sofia: Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 65–73.
- Mann, H. B., and Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, pages 50–60.
- Ouyang, J., Jiang, J., and Liu, H. (2022). Dependency distance measures in assessing L2 writing proficiency. Assessing Writing, 51.
- Straka, M. (2018). UDPipe 2.0 Prototype at CoNLL 2018 UD Shared Task. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2018 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (October 31 – November 1, 2018). Brussels: Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 197–207.
- Šebesta, K., Bedřichová, Z., Šormová, K., Štindlová, B., Hrdlička, M., Hrdličková, T., Hana, J., Petkevič, V., Jelínek, T., Škodová, S., Poláčková, M., Janeš, P., Lundáková, K., Skoumalová, H., Sládek, Š., Pierscieniak, P., Toufarová, D., Richter, M., Straka, M., and Rosen, A. (2014). CzeSL-SGT: korpus češtiny nerodilých mluvčích s automaticky provedenou anotací, verze 2 z 28. 7. 2014. Praha. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK. Accessible at: http://www.korpus.cz.
- Šebesta, K., Goláňová, H., Jelínek, T., Jelínková, B., Křen, M., Letafková, J., Procházka, P., and Skoumalová, H. (2013). SKRIPT2012: akviziční korpus psané češtiny – přepisy písemných prací žáků základních a středních škol v ČR. Praha, Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK. Accessible at: http://www.korpus.cz.
- Yang, W., Lu, X., and Weigle, C., S. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, pages 53–67.
- Zeman, D., et al. (2022). Universal Dependencies 2.10, LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta, Univerzita Karlova. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-4758.