Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Temporary migration as a mechanism for lasting cultural change: evidence from Nepal Cover

Temporary migration as a mechanism for lasting cultural change: evidence from Nepal

By:  and    
Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics by migrant status

(1)(2)(3)(4)
OverallEver migrateNever migrateP-value (2) = (3)
Panel A
Husband characteristics
Age46.11938.93450.7200.000***
[12.921][9.339][12.800]
Years of education5.1046.2194.3910.000***
[3.940][3.517][4.030]
Can read or write0.7630.8770.6900.000***
[0.365][0.270][0.398]
Wife characteristics
Age41.65035.07645.8590.000***
[12.143][9.016][12.020]
Years of education2.5133.7701.7080.000***
[3.545][3.790][3.125]
Can read or write0.5270.6770.4310.000***
[0.401][0.369][0.391]
N2,5089791,5292,508
Panel B
Household characteristics
No. of resident household members3.4833.6293.3860.000***
[1.854][1.745][1.916]
Resident mother-in-law0.2300.3160.1740.000***
[0.421][0.465][0.379]
Resident father-in-law0.1590.2320.1100.000***
[0.365][0.422][0.313]
Resident daughter-in-law0.1850.0840.2510.000***
[0.388][0.277][0.434]
Shocks
Natural disaster (nonearthquake)0.0440.0390.0470.092*
[0.206][0.194][0.213]
Serious illness0.2230.2130.2300.074*
[0.416][0.409][0.421]
Death of household member0.0550.0530.0560.630
[0.228][0.225][0.230]
Falling agricultural prices0.1310.1090.1460.000***
[0.338][0.312][0.353]
Decrease in income0.1550.1340.1700.000***
[0.362][0.341][0.375]
Loss of employment0.0230.0200.0250.178
[0.151][0.141][0.156]
Mercalli scale 2015 earthquake6.9266.8706.9620.000***
[0.505][0.525][0.488]
N7,5723,0134,5597,572

[i] Notes: This table reports mean values with standard deviations in brackets. Column 1 includes all households, Column 2 is limited to households in which the husband migrates at some point, and Column 3 is limited to households in which the husband has not reported migrating during any survey round. Column 4 reports the p-value for a t-test of differences between columns 2 and 3. In panel A, data are at the household level and characteristics are defined using the mean over time (2014–2018) for each household. Data in panel B are pooled 2014–2018 values. The nonearthquake shock averages represent the fraction of households that experienced a given event (e.g., death of a household member) since the previous round of data were collected.

Table 2

Outcomes by migrant status

(1)(2)(3)(4)
OverallEver migrateNever migrateP-value (2) = (3)
Panel A: Decision-making over all categories
Husband alone0.1360.1050.1560.000***
[0.209][0.187][0.220]
Husband and wife jointly0.3380.3040.3610.000***
[0.313][0.313][0.310]
Wife alone0.1080.1770.0620.000***
[0.208][0.256][0.152]
Panel B: Income and financial behavior
Annual income11.56211.82611.3880.000***
[3.117][2.931][3.223]
Savings deposited in past month4.4254.6994.2440.000***
[3.056][3.036][3.055]
Currently borrowing6.9227.0496.8380.128
[5.886][5.855][5.906]
Currently lent1.6301.9451.4210.000***
[4.006][4.307][3.780]
Panel C: Expenditures
Temptation goods4.1243.5284.5150.000***
[3.685][3.677][3.638]
Health care5.9715.7656.1070.000***
[3.404][3.428][3.381]
Ceremonies or celebrations7.1117.0637.1430.143
[2.298][2.357][2.259]
Child education5.1285.8564.6410.000***
[3.381][2.961][3.553]
Child clothing5.1845.8604.7300.000***
[2.985][2.518][3.181]
Adult women clothing6.3306.4246.2680.000***
[1.626][1.464][1.721]
N7,5723,0134,5597,572

[i] Notes: This table reports mean values with standard deviations in brackets. Column 1 includes all households, Column 2 is limited to households in which the husband migrates at some point, and Column 3 is limited to households in which the husband has not reported migrating during any survey round. Column 4 reports the p-value for a t-test of differences between columns 2 and 3. The data are at the household level and are pooled 2014–2018 values. Decision-making variables are the fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described out of all categories included in the analysis: temptation goods, health care, ceremonies, children's education, children's clothing, and adult women's clothing. See Section C of the Appendix for more details on how these variables are composed. All rupee amounts are transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

Figure 1

Fraction of decisions made jointly/alone across husband's migration status.

Table 3

Shifts in decision-making power as the husband's migrant status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: all categories
Husband alone−0.042*** (0.010)−0.038*** (0.010)−0.039*** (0.009)−0.019 (0.016)
Husband and wife jointly−0.092*** (0.014)−0.112*** (0.016)−0.104*** (0.016)−0.125*** (0.026)
Wife alone0.101*** (0.011)0.107*** (0.013)0.110*** (0.014)0.108*** (0.019)
N7,5697,5693,0103,010
Panel B: Disaggregated by category
Temptation goods
Husband alone−0.065*** (0.014)−0.064*** (0.016)−0.067*** (0.016)−0.065** (0.027)
Husband and wife jointly−0.037*** (0.009)−0.052*** (0.011)−0.044*** (0.012)−0.055*** (0.018)
Wife alone0.017*** (0.005)0.018*** (0.005)0.016*** (0.006)0.009 (0.011)
N7,5247,5242,9932,993
Health care
Husband alone−0.038*** (0.013)−0.035** (0.014)−0.031** (0.013)−0.005 (0.022)
Husband and wife jointly−0.131*** (0.018)−0.161*** (0.020)−0.147*** (0.022)−0.161*** (0.040)
Wife alone0.140*** (0.017)0.160*** (0.020)0.155*** (0.022)0.154*** (0.031)
N7,5647,5643,0093,009
Ceremonies or celebrations
Husband alone−0.037*** (0.012)−0.031** (0.012)−0.030** (0.012)−0 (0.023)
Husband and wife jointly−0.104*** (0.019)−0.126*** (0.021)−0.114*** (0.022)−0.130*** (0.037)
Wife alone0.119*** (0.014)0.127*** (0.017)0.127*** (0.018)0.118*** (0.028)
N7,5377,5372,9992,999
Child education
Husband alone−0.043*** (0.016)−0.036** (0.015)−0.038*** (0.015)−0.016 (0.024)
Husband and wife jointly−0.091*** (0.023)−0.099*** (0.024)−0.108*** (0.027)−0.137*** (0.045)
Wife alone0.135*** (0.018)0.139*** (0.022)0.153*** (0.023)0.147*** (0.031)
N7,4157,4152,9782,978
Child clothing
Husband alone−0.043*** (0.014)−0.038*** (0.014)−0.037*** (0.014)−0.013 (0.023)
Husband and wife jointly−0.106*** (0.023)−0.114*** (0.026)−0.127*** (0.027)−0.181*** (0.041)
Wife alone0.153*** (0.018)0.159*** (0.023)0.172*** (0.023)0.171*** (0.033)
N7,4697,4692,9952,995
Adult women clothing
Husband alone−0.034** (0.014)−0.023 (0.015)−0.031** (0.015)−0.002 (0.025)
Husband and wife jointly−0.147*** (0.023)−0.177*** (0.025)−0.164*** (0.026)−0.202*** (0.049)
Wife alone0.150*** (0.018)0.167*** (0.022)0.167*** (0.023)0.167*** (0.040)
N7,5537,5533,0083,008
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households wherein the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. Outcome variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described. Note that children's clothing includes expenditures on school uniforms. See Appendix (Section C) for more details on how these variables are composed.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, Village Development Committees.

Table 4

Shifts in expenditures (asinh) as the husband's migrant status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Temptation goods−1.053*** (0.168)−1.204*** (0.178)−1.184*** (0.176)−1.196*** (0.308)
N7,4177,4172,9402,940
Health care−0.009 (0.142)−0.035 (0.166)−0.031 (0.173)0.257 (0.301)
N7,1457,1452,8502,850
Ceremonies or celebrations0.044 (0.105)0.014 (0.100)0.067 (0.109)−0.196 (0.237)
N7,4077,4072,9482,948
Child education0.170* (0.101)0.272*** (0.104)0.181* (0.108)−0.190 (0.178)
N7,3397,3392,9542,954
Child clothing0.385*** (0.096)0.442*** (0.104)0.437*** (0.109)0.176 (0.167)
N7,3497,3492,9652,965
Adult women clothing−0.071 (0.063)−0.057 (0.064)−0.029 (0.065)0.016 (0.124)
N7,5487,5483,0053,005
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households wherein the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, Village Development Committees.

Figure 2

Persistence in women's decision-making power.

Fraction of Decisions Made by

Husband Alone Husband+Wife Wife Alone.

Table 5

Dynamic shifts in expenditures: first-difference approach (asinh)

α1: returnedα2: leftP-value: |α1| = |α2|N
Δ Temptation goods1.084*** (0.361)−0.952** (0.386)0.8193,491
Δ Health care0.328 (0.369)0.672** (0.329)0.4673,368
Δ Ceremonies or celebrations−0.403 (0.286)−0.909*** (0.299)0.1633,473
Δ Child education−0.310 (0.236)−0.450* (0.258)0.6153,389
Δ Child clothing−0.107 (0.213)−0.119 (0.243)0.9553,407
Δ Adult women clothing−0.027 (0.153)−0.120 (0.165)0.6933,563

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each row represents a separate regression where Returned and Left represent dummies that describe the change in the husband's migrant status between the previous and current periods. The P-value is from an F-test testing for equality between the absolute values of the Returned coefficient and the Left coefficient. Controls for the base period are included. The control set across all regressions includes a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

Table 6

Heterogeneity by trip length: change in decision-making (all categories)

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Dependent variable: husband alone
Migrant0.00525 (0.0145)0.00860 (0.0152)0.00735 (0.0148)0.0209 (0.0257)
Migrant × ≥ 6 months−0.0619*** (0.0144)−0.0616*** (0.0152)−0.0600*** (0.0152)−0.0541** (0.0224)
N7,5697,5693,0103,010
Dep. variable: husband and wife jointly
Migrant−0.0784*** (0.0212)−0.0975*** (0.0232)−0.0905*** (0.0242)−0.105*** (0.0356)
Migrant × ≥ 6 months−0.0180 (0.0231)−0.0184 (0.0224)−0.0176 (0.0225)−0.0274 (0.0362)
N7,5697,5693,0103,010
Dep. variable: wife alone
Migrant0.0645*** (0.0178)0.0700*** (0.0194)0.0738*** (0.0210)0.0631* (0.0322)
Migrant × ≥ 6 months0.0478** (0.0221)0.0485** (0.0224)0.0467** (0.0224)0.0606* (0.0330)
N7,5697,5693,0103,010
Household FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each column refers to different specifications, as noted. For each specification, we regress three different dependent variables: the fraction of decisions over which the husband solely, the husband and wife jointly, or the wife solely has control. For each regression, we report the coefficient on the dummy for the situation that a husband is currently migrating and the coefficient on this variable interacted with a dummy indicating that the migrant spell is at least 6 months long. As before, the control set across all regressions includes a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

HH, household; VDC, Village Development Committees.

Figure A1

Village development committees representing seven districts in our data.

Note: The seven districts are Dhading, Mahotari, Nuwakot, Palpa, Rautahat, Sarlahi, and Tanahu.

Table A1

Changes in income and financial behavior (asinh) as the husband's migrant status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Annual income0.280** (0.130)0.173 (0.134)0.204 (0.135)0.004 (0.232)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Savings deposited in past month0.122 (0.085)0.092 (0.100)0.071 (0.112)−0.173 (0.207)
N7,5247,5242,9962,996
Currently borrowing0.056 (0.217)0.269 (0.240)0.324 (0.269)0.139 (0.490)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Currently lending−0.073 (0.184)0.016 (0.197)−0.043 (0.224)−0.299 (0.432)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table B1

Shifts in decision-making power as son's migration status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: All categories
Husband alone−0.042*** (0.010)−0.038*** (0.010)−0.039*** (0.009)−0.019 (0.016)
Husband and wife jointly0.010 (0.012)0.008 (0.012)0.010 (0.012)0.012 (0.021)
Wife alone0.011 (0.008)0.011 (0.008)0.012 (0.008)0.004 (0.015)
N7,5697,5694,0254,025
Panel B: Disaggregated by category
Temptation goods
Husband alone0.011 (0.011)0.008 (0.011)0.006 (0.011)0.029 (0.022)
Husband and wife jointly0.004 (0.011)0.005 (0.011)0.002 (0.011)−0.008 (0.021)
Wife alone0.010 (0.007)0.010 (0.007)0.009 (0.008)0.004 (0.015)
N7,5247,5244,0094,009
Health care
Husband alone0.001 (0.013)0.001 (0.013)−0.004 (0.012)−0.017 (0.018)
Husband and wife jointly0.023 (0.017)0.020 (0.017)0.023 (0.018)0.040 (0.031)
Wife alone0.012 (0.010)0.012 (0.010)0.014 (0.010)0 (0.017)
N7,5647,5644,0204,020
Ceremonies or celebrations
Husband alone0.001 (0.012)0.001 (0.012)−0.004 (0.012)−0.007 (0.018)
Husband and wife jointly0.035** (0.016)0.031* (0.016)0.032* (0.017)0.044 (0.027)
Wife alone0.015 (0.013)0.015 (0.013)0.016 (0.013)−0.002 (0.020)
N7,5377,5374,0134,013
Child education
Husband alone−0.003 (0.014)−0.005 (0.014)−0.009 (0.014)−0.032 (0.019)
Husband and wife jointly−0.043** (0.020)−0.045** (0.020)−0.035* (0.020)−0.035 (0.035)
Wife alone0.010 (0.012)0.012 (0.013)0.016 (0.013)0.009 (0.023)
N7,4157,4153,8973,897
Child clothing
Husband alone0.004 (0.013)0.002 (0.013)−0.004 (0.012)−0.023 (0.018)
Husband and wife jointly−0.007 (0.020)−0.009 (0.020)0.001 (0.020)0.007 (0.032)
Wife alone0.009 (0.013)0.012 (0.013)0.012 (0.013)0 (0.024)
N7,4697,4693,9383,938
Adult women clothing
Husband alone0.008 (0.014)0.007 (0.014)0.001 (0.013)−0.015 (0.020)
Husband and wife jointly0.013 (0.020)0.011 (0.020)0.011 (0.019)−0.010 (0.038)
Wife alone0.008 (0.018)0.007 (0.018)0.012 (0.018)0.022 (0.025)
N7,5537,5534,0134,013
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each displayed coefficient is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that at least one son in the household is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households wherein the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. Outcome variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described. Note that children's clothing includes expenditures on school uniforms. See Section C in the Appendix for more details on how these variables are composed.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table B2

Shifts in expenditures (asinh) as son's migration status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Temptation goods0.176 (0.134)0.189 (0.129)0.134 (0.134)0.201 (0.243)
N7,4177,4173,9563,956
Health care0.221 (0.147)0.236 (0.149)0.199 (0.144)0.219 (0.275)
N7,1457,1453,8113,811
Ceremonies or celebrations0.122 (0.127)0.111 (0.129)0.111 (0.128)0.009 (0.221)
N7,4077,4073,9393,939
Child education−0.351*** (0.128)−0.357*** (0.128)−0.262** (0.132)−0.211 (0.177)
N7,3397,3393,8453,845
Child clothing−0.089 (0.107)−0.079 (0.106)0.006 (0.107)−0.086 (0.160)
N7,3497,3493,8393,839
Adult women clothing−0.059 (0.077)−0.055 (0.076)−0.045 (0.076)−0.076 (0.136)
N7548754840104010
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that at least one son in the household is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table B3

Changes in income and financial behavior (asinh) as son's migration status changes

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Annual income0.497*** (0.156)0.524*** (0.163)0.541*** (0.164)0.509* (0.287)
N7,5727,5724,0284,028
Savings deposited in past month0.034 (0.082)0.027 (0.080)0.047 (0.080)0.110 (0.191)
N7,5247,5244,0054,005
Currently borrowing0.523*** (0.197)0.482** (0.196)0.496** (0.213)0.833** (0.405)
N7,5727,5724,0284,028
Currently lending−0.117 (0.168)−0.180 (0.167)−0.164 (0.170)0.008 (0.275)
N7,5727,5724,0284,028
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that at least one son in the household is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table B4

Characteristics by migrant status

(1)(2)(3)(4)
OverallHusband ever migrateSon ever migrateP-value (2) = (3)
Panel A
Husband characteristics
Age46.11938.93451.8390.000***
[12.921][9.339][10.627]
Years of education5.1046.2194.5530.000***
[3.940][3.517][3.882]
Can read or write0.7630.8770.7290.000***
[0.365][0.270][0.377]
Wife characteristics
Age41.65035.07647.2470.000***
[12.143][9.016][9.852]
Years of education2.5133.7701.5840.000***
[3.545][3.790][2.849]
Can read or write0.5270.6770.4490.000***
[0.401][0.369][0.378]
N2,5089791,3171,923
Panel B
Household characteristics income (asinh)11.56211.82611.60730.000***
[3.117][2.931][3.183]
No. of resident household members3.4833.6293.3230.000***
[1.854][1.745][1.877]
Resident mother-in-law0.2300.3160.1580.000***
[0.421][0.465][0.365]
Resident father-in-law0.1590.2320.0880.000***
[0.365][0.422][0.284]
Resident daughter-in-law0.1850.0840.3080.000***
[0.388][0.277][0.462]
Shocks
Natural disaster (nonearthquake)0.0440.0390.0520.011**
[0.206][0.194][0.222]
Serious illness0.2230.2130.2230.214
[0.416][0.409][0.417]
Death of household member0.0550.0530.0540.959
[0.228][0.225][0.226]
Falling agricultural prices0.1310.1090.1280.000***
[0.338][0.312][0.335]
Decrease in income0.1550.1340.1540.003***
[0.362][0.341][0.361]
Loss of employment0.0230.0200.0230.251
[0.151][0.141][0.150]
Mercalli scale 2015 earthquake6.9266.8706.9220.006***
[0.505][0.525][0.512]
N7,5723,0134,0285,888

[i] Notes: This table reports mean values with standard deviations in brackets. Column 1 includes all households, Column 2 is limited to households in which the husband migrates at some point, and Column 3 is limited to households in which a son migrates at some point. Column 4 reports the p-value for a t-test of differences between columns 2 and 3. In Panel A, data are at the household level and characteristics are defined using the mean value over time (2014–2018) for each household. Data in Panel B are pooled 2014–2018 values. The averages of the nonearthquake shocks represent the fraction of households that experienced a given event (e.g., death of a household member) since the past round of data were collected.

Table C1

Decision-making outcomes by migrant status

(1)(2)(3)(4)
OverallEver migrateNever migrateP-value (2) – (3)
Panel A: All categories
Husband alone0.1360.1050.1560.000***
[0.209][0.187][0.220]
Husband and wife jointly0.3380.3040.3610.000***
[0.313][0.313][0.310]
Wife alone0.1080.1770.0620.000***
[0.208][0.256][0.152]
Panel B: Disaggregated by category
Temptation goods
Husband alone0.1920.1570.2140.000***
[0.293][0.274][0.302]
Husband and wife jointly0.1070.0800.1250.000***
[0.254][0.224][0.270]
Wife alone0.0420.0440.0400.268
[0.146][0.151][0.143]
Health care
Husband alone0.1200.0870.1410.000***
[0.274][0.234][0.296]
Husband and wife jointly0.4180.3640.4540.000***
[0.437][0.434][0.435]
Wife alone0.1100.1930.0560.000***
[0.277][0.348][0.199]
Ceremonies or celebrations
Husband alone0.1240.0930.1440.000***
[0.288][0.252][0.308]
Husband and wife jointly0.4790.4320.5100.000***
[0.438][0.438][0.435]
Wife alone0.1370.2110.0890.000***
[0.300][0.359][0.241]
Child education
Husband alone0.1310.0970.1540.000***
[0.325][0.283][0.348]
Husband and wife jointly0.3870.3910.3840.528
[0.474][0.475][0.474]
Wife alone0.1280.2450.0490.000***
[0.324][0.419][0.206]
Child clothing
Husband alone0.1240.0960.1440.000***
[0.311][0.278][0.330]
Husband and wife jointly0.3850.3810.3870.556
[0.466][0.467][0.465]
Wife alone0.1400.2620.0580.000***
[0.331][0.424][0.216]
Adult women clothing
Husband alone0.1300.1000.1490.000***
[0.336][0.301][0.356]
Husband and wife jointly0.4590.3820.5100.000***
[0.498][0.486][0.500]
Wife alone0.2360.3420.1660.000***
[0.424][0.474][0.372]
N7,5723,0134,5597,572

[i] Notes: This table reports the mean values with standard deviations in brackets. Column 1 includes all households, Column 2 is limited to households in which the husband migrates at some point, and Column 3 is limited to households wherein the husband has not reported migrating during any survey round. Column 4 reports the p-value for a t-test of differences between columns 2 and 3. The data are at the household level and are pooled 2014–2018 values. Decision-making variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described out of all categories included in the analysis: temptation goods, health care, ceremonies, children's education, children's clothing, and adult women's clothing. See the text of this section (Appendix Section C) for more details on how these variables are composed.

Table D1

Changes in income and financial behavior (asinh) as the husband's migrant status changes – only considering migration spells outside of Nepal and lasting >6 months

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Annual income0.361** (0.169)0.267 (0.165)0.245 (0.174)0.076 (0.226)
N7,5727,5722,1972,197
Savings deposited in past month0.245** (0.101)0.235** (0.109)0.332*** (0.120)0.062 (0.254)
N7,5247,5242,1842,184
Currently borrowing−0.010 (0.271)0.152 (0.282)0.063 (0.310)0.022 (0.560)
N7,5727,5722,1972,197
Currently lending0.228 (0.214)0.362 (0.232)0.311 (0.258)−0.026 (0.489)
N7,5727,5722,1972,197
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D2

Shifts in decision-making power as the husband's migrant status changes – only considering migration spells outside of Nepal and lasting >6 months

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: all categories
Husband alone−0.059*** (0.011)−0.055*** (0.010)−0.056*** (0.010)−0.050*** (0.014)
Husband and wife jointly−0.095*** (0.017)−0.105*** (0.018)−0.105*** (0.019)−0.103*** (0.032)
Wife alone0.115*** (0.014)0.116*** (0.016)0.121*** (0.016)0.121*** (0.025)
N7,5697,5692,1942,194
Panel B: disaggregated by category
Temptation goods
Husband alone−0.102*** (0.013)−0.101*** (0.014)−0.105*** (0.014)−0.107*** (0.024)
Husband and wife jointly−0.031*** (0.010)−0.041*** (0.012)−0.039*** (0.013)−0.034* (0.020)
Wife alone0.014** (0.006)0.014** (0.006)0.012* (0.007)0.005 (0.015)
N7,5247,5242,1842,184
Health care
Husband alone−0.037** (0.015)−0.032** (0.015)−0.032** (0.015)−0.028 (0.020)
Husband and wife jointly−0.152*** (0.023)−0.171*** (0.021)−0.167*** (0.023)−0.163*** (0.048)
Wife alone0.158*** (0.021)0.168*** (0.021)0.170*** (0.023)0.169*** (0.037)
N7,5647,5642,1942,194
Ceremonies or celebrations
Husband alone−0.049*** (0.016)−0.044*** (0.016)−0.046*** (0.016)−0.033 (0.021)
Husband and wife jointly−0.095*** (0.023)−0.103*** (0.024)−0.106*** (0.025)−0.100** (0.047)
Wife alone0.130*** (0.019)0.132*** (0.021)0.140*** (0.023)0.130*** (0.039)
N7,5377,5372,1842,184
Child education
Husband alone−0.063*** (0.019)−0.056*** (0.017)−0.049*** (0.016)−0.036 (0.022)
Husband and wife jointly−0.087*** (0.027)−0.088*** (0.027)−0.094*** (0.029)−0.108** (0.048)
Wife alone0.161*** (0.023)0.160*** (0.025)0.170*** (0.027)0.181*** (0.037)
N7,4157,4152,1712,171
Child clothing
Husband alone−0.071*** (0.018)−0.067*** (0.017)−0.063*** (0.017)−0.053** (0.023)
Husband and wife jointly−0.121*** (0.029)−0.123*** (0.030)−0.127*** (0.031)−0.152*** (0.048)
Wife alone0.186*** (0.025)0.186*** (0.028)0.194*** (0.030)0.206*** (0.045)
N7,4697,4692,1822,182
Adult women clothing
Husband alone−0.049** (0.020)−0.040** (0.019)−0.042** (0.020)−0.035 (0.024)
Husband and wife jointly−0.162*** (0.023)−0.180*** (0.022)−0.175*** (0.024)−0.190*** (0.047)
Wife alone0.170*** (0.018)0.179*** (0.020)0.185*** (0.020)0.196*** (0.045)
N7,5537,5532,1922,192
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households wherein the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. Outcome variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described. Note that children's clothing includes expenditures on school uniforms. See Section C of the Appendix for more details on how these variables are composed.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D3

Shifts in expenditures (asinh) as the husband's migrant status changes – only considering migration spells outside of Nepal and lasting >6 months

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Temptation goods−1.325*** (0.180)−1.427*** (0.179)−1.482*** (0.170)−1.589*** (0.328)
N7,4177,4172,1442,144
Health care−0.051 (0.194)−0.089 (0.217)−0.090 (0.229)0.035 (0.354)
N7,1457,1452,0832,083
Ceremonies or celebrations0.135 (0.111)0.124 (0.114)0.137 (0.109)−0.179 (0.225)
N7,4077,4072,1552,155
Child education0.226** (0.112)0.312*** (0.114)0.285** (0.111)−0.078 (0.182)
N7,3397,3392,1552,155
Child clothing0.338*** (0.108)0.360*** (0.109)0.320*** (0.107)0.204 (0.175)
N7,3497,3492,1612,161
Adult women clothing0.043 (0.073)0.069 (0.077)0.064 (0.082)0.165 (0.148)
N7,5487,5482,1912,191
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D4

Changes in expenditures, income, and financial behavior as the husband's migrant status changes – log(x+1)

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: expenditures
Temptation goods−0.951*** (0.153)−1.086*** (0.161)−1.066*** (0.159)−1.072*** (0.280)
N7,4177,4172,9402,940
Health care−0.013 (0.131)−0.035 (0.152)−0.032 (0.158)0.233 (0.275)
N7,1457,1452,8502,850
Ceremonies or celebrations0.035 (0.097)0.006 (0.092)0.056 (0.102)−0.187 (0.220)
N7,4077,4072,9482,948
Children's education0.154* (0.092)0.246** (0.096)0.163* (0.099)−0.176 (0.162)
N7,3397,3392,9542,954
Children's clothing0.351*** (0.088)0.401*** (0.094)0.399*** (0.098)0.163 (0.151)
N7,3497,3492,9652,965
Adult women's clothing−0.062 (0.058)−0.049 (0.059)−0.022 (0.059)0.022 (0.115)
N7,5487,5483,0053,005
Panel B: income and financial behavior
Annual income0.281** (0.124)0.177 (0.128)0.208 (0.129)0.023 (0.221)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Savings deposited in past month0.109 (0.076)0.085 (0.090)0.064 (0.102)−0.155 (0.189)
N7,5247,5242,9962,996
Currently borrowing0.055 (0.204)0.254 (0.225)0.304 (0.253)0.131 (0.461)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Currently lending−0.068 (0.173)0.016 (0.185)−0.040 (0.210)−0.282 (0.406)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D5

Changes in expenditures, income, and financial behavior as the husband's migrant status changes – top-coded at the 99th percentile

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: expenditures
Temptation goods−120.197** (53.600)−123.775** (53.349)−103.070* (58.289)−84.433 (89.528)
N7,4177,4172,9402,940
Health care−142.523 (209.494)67.791 (208.082)37.156 (213.112)384.495 (441.580)
N7,1457,1452,8502,850
Ceremonies or celebrations−61.221 (200.328)−98.690 (207.853)−101.441 (244.901)−69.571 (428.462)
N7,4077,4072,9482,948
Children's education46.994 (70.327)57.460 (80.099)32.590 (86.554)−17.220 (91.988)
N7,3397,3392,9542,954
Children's clothing66.530*** (19.940)66.780*** (19.517)68.799*** (21.046)43.934 (46.406)
N7,3497,3492,9652,965
Adult women's clothing−12.056 (17.752)−11.160 (18.640)−5.324 (18.132)22.142 (36.732)
N7,5487,5483,0053,005
Panel B: income and financial behavior
Annual income47,989.637*** (10,443.880)42,926.326*** (10,572.657)40,291.132*** (12,732.178)46,886.496** (20,457.034)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Savings deposited in past month26.565 (117.086)65.817 (133.244)33.088 (151.638)63.081 (288.894)
N7,5247,5242,9962,996
Currently borrowing−4,592.633 (5,078.635)−4,186.492 (5,943.972)−7,271.935 (6,512.158)−4,250.191 (11,469.621)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Currently lending−499.550 (1,535.515)538.604 (1,651.946)154.814 (1,959.374)−2,634.804 (3,550.470)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D6

Changes in expenditures, income, and financial behavior as the husband's migrant status changes – top-coded at the 95th percentile

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Panel A: expenditures
Temptation goods−126.360*** (38.072)−137.050*** (38.904)−117.563*** (39.783)−103.698 (63.795)
N7,4177,4172,9402,940
Health care−75.066 (133.753)−3.897 (121.987)−36.762 (119.550)154.302 (255.985)
N7,1457,1452,8502,850
Ceremonies or celebrations−91.457 (92.147)−121.699 (94.857)−98.522 (116.511)−163.506 (172.497)
N7,4077,4072,9482,948
Children's education47.410 (37.658)58.955 (41.153)29.104 (44.499)−70.578 (63.297)
N7,3397,3392,9542,954
Children's clothing47.525*** (16.438)46.156*** (16.379)48.749*** (17.297)22.596 (34.274)
N7,3497,3492,9652,965
Adult women's clothing−7.454 (13.565)−3.645 (14.699)1.919 (14.565)13.527 (27.480)
N7,5487,5483,0053,005
Panel B: income and financial behavior
Annual income42,899.597*** (7,854.542)40,695.726*** (8,243.078)39,730.933*** (10,362.565)48,730.244***(15,369.961)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Savings deposited in past month11.375 (23.572)18.660 (28.278)10.282 (33.734)−5.363 (56.177)
N7,5247,5242,9962,996
Currently borrowing1,178.234 (3,369.408)2,149.937 (3,874.228)201.140 (4,213.134)−2,007.624 (8,311.890)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Currently lending53.964 (667.219)536.425 (749.997)120.092 (909.763)−1,694.717 (1,763.982)
N7,5727,5723,0133,013
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. Column 4 includes household-specific time trends.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table D7

Shifts in expenditures (asinh) as the husband's migrant status changes – only considering the first two rounds of data

(1)(2)(3)
Temptation goods−0.921*** (0.228)−1.154*** (0.232)−1.400*** (0.319)
N4,3524,3521,540
Health care0.052 (0.189)0.029 (0.224)−0.012 (0.371)
N4,0164,0161,426
Ceremonies or celebrations0.113 (0.135)−0.134 (0.137)−0.086 (0.222)
N4,3384,3381,554
Child education0.149 (0.155)0.415** (0.180)0.543** (0.242)
N4,2704,2701,558
Child clothing0.289** (0.140)0.423*** (0.161)0.456** (0.209)
N4,2864,2861,572
Adult women clothing−0.053 (0.098)0.071 (0.107)0.160 (0.186)
N4,5304,5301,618
Household and year FEYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNo

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. All columns include household FE and year FE. The first column reports the results without any controls. The second and remaining columns include a control set: a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Columns 3 and 4 are limited to the sample of households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. All amounts are in rupees and transformed by the inverse hyperbolic sine.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table E1

Attrition over time

(1)(2)(3)(4)
2014201620172018
Full sample2,5082,2811,4561,327
Attrition (not found).227165294
Attrition (dropped).0887887

[i] Notes: The table reports the number of women in each category. Women leave the sample because either the surveyors could not locate the household/respondent or the households were purposely dropped (due to either the earthquake or other reasons necessary for the randomized evaluation's study design). Attrition numbers are cumulative (the columns will always add up to the full sample in 2014). See Section E in the Appendix for more details.

Table E2

Husband's migration and household attrition

(1)(2)(3)(4)
Absent in next round−0.020 (0.019)0.002 (0.022)0.046** (0.022)−0.042 (0.038)
N6,2256,2252,4652,465
  Not found−0.002 (0.015)0.019 (0.017)0.024 (0.018)−0.042 (0.038)
  N6,2256,2252,4652,465
  Dropped−0.017 (0.016)−0.017 (0.016)0.022 (0.015)-
  N6,2256,2252,465-
Household and year FEYesYesYesYes
ControlsNoYesYesYes
Limited sampleNoNoYesYes
HH-specific time trendsNoNoNoYes

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each coefficient displayed is from a separate regression and represents the coefficient on a binary variable indicating that the husband is currently migrating. The control set across all regressions includes a separate dummy each for the situation that the household experienced a natural disaster (aside from the 2015 earthquake), serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment, a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Even columns limit the sample to households in which the husband migrates in any of the four rounds. The last two columns include household-specific time trends, in addition to the control set. Absent in next round – dropped is not estimated in the final two columns because the outcome is perfectly collinear with household-specific time trends. See Section E of the Appendix for more detail.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

FE, fixed effects; HH, household; VDC, village development committee.

Table E3

Selection into attrition by migration status over time

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
Not foundDroppedCurrent migrantNot found × current migrantDropped × current migrantN
Household characteristics
No. of resident household members0.0420.0980.270***0.103−0.1526,245
Resident mother-in-law0.020−0.0190.144***0.121***0.0206,245
Resident father-in-law0.009−0.0100.113***0.089**0.0496,245
Resident daughter-in-law0.040*−0.015−0.165***−0.0410.0126,245
Household shocks
Natural disaster (nonearthquake)−0.0020.028**−0.0080.005−0.0046,227
Serious illness0.039*0.023−0.029**−0.083*0.0616,231
Death of household member0.0180.019*−0.016**0.0260.0176,229
Falling agricultural prices−0.0070.205***−0.021*−0.049**−0.0466,116
Decrease in income−0.0160.243***−0.039***−0.032−0.0456,130
Loss of employment0.0140.013*−0.014***−0.006−0.0136,217
Mercalli scale 2015 earthquake−0.2645.278***−0.229**0.710**0.0376,245

Notes: Each row represents a different regression in which the outcome variable is either a household characteristic or shock. Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Column 1 lists the coefficient on a dummy for the situation that the respondent was absent in the next period because they could not be located. Column 2 lists the coefficient on the dummy if the respondent was absent in the next round because they were dropped from the sample on purpose. Column 3 lists the coefficient on a variable indicating that the husband is migrating during the current time period. The fourth and fifth columns show the interactions between the previous columns. The sixth column lists the sample size for each regression.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

VDC, village development committee.

Table F1

Dynamic shifts in decision-making power between husband and wife: first-difference approach

α1: returnedα2: leftP-value: |α1| = |α2|N
Panel A: Δ All categories
Husband alone0.022 (0.020)−0.026 (0.028)0.9193,580
Husband and wife jointly0.144*** (0.032)−0.040 (0.031)0.036**3,580
Wife alone−0.111*** (0.023)0.086*** (0.028)0.5573,580
Panel B: Δ disaggregated by category
Δ Temptation goods
Husband alone0.079*** (0.025)−0.024 (0.036)0.2083,566
Husband and wife jointly0.044* (0.026)−0.031 (0.027)0.7673,566
Wife alone−0.015 (0.017)0.013 (0.018)0.9633,566
Δ Health care
Husband alone0.004 (0.025)−0.024 (0.034)0.6463,579
Husband and wife jointly0.193*** (0.047)−0.036 (0.048)0.035**3,579
Wife alone−0.149*** (0.032)0.121*** (0.041)0.6463,579
Δ Ceremonies
Husband alone0.022 (0.025)−0.019 (0.034)0.9453,571
Husband and wife jointly0.160*** (0.047)−0.057 (0.050)0.2023,571
Wife alone−0.127*** (0.039)0.106** (0.048)0.7843,571
Δ Child education
Husband alone−0.008 (0.032)−0.063 (0.044)0.2623,456
Husband and wife jointly0.154*** (0.056)−0.039 (0.055)0.1853,456
Wife alone−0.167*** (0.044)0.085** (0.039)0.2343,456
Δ Child clothing
Husband alone0.010 (0.033)−0.041 (0.043)0.6243,495
Husband and wife jointly0.168*** (0.056)−0.071 (0.051)0.2383,495
Wife alone−0.169*** (0.048)0.109** (0.046)0.4533,495
Δ Adult women clothing
Husband alone0.006 (0.036)−0.003 (0.036)0.9633,572
Husband and wife jointly0.247*** (0.057)−0.102* (0.052)0.078*3,572
Wife alone−0.195*** (0.045)0.099** (0.045)0.2023,572

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each row represents a separate regression where Returned and Left represent dummies that describe the change in the husband's migrant status between the previous and current periods. The P-value is from an F-test testing for equality between the absolute value of the Returned coefficient and Left coefficient. Controls for the base period are included. The control set across all regressions includes a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Outcome variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described. Note that children's clothing includes expenditures on school uniforms. See Section C of the Appendix for more details on how these variables are composed.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

VDC, village development committee.

Table F2

Dynamic shifts in decision-making power between husband and wife: first-difference approach with the dummy Gone

α1: returnedα2: leftα3: goneP-value: |α1| = |α2|N
Panel A: Δ all categories
Husband alone0.019 (0.032)−0.029 (0.038)−0.005 (0.039)0.8793,580
Husband and wife jointly0.123*** (0.045)−0.063 (0.042)−0.042 (0.050)0.4403,580
Wife alone−0.109*** (0.030)0.088** (0.037)0.004 (0.039)0.7303,580
Panel B: Δ disaggregated by category
Δ Temptation goods
Husband alone0.081*** (0.029)−0.022 (0.047)0.005 (0.040)0.3443,566
Husband and wife jointly0.017 (0.036)−0.060* (0.036)−0.053 (0.048)0.5233,566
Wife alone−0.028 (0.022)−0.000 (0.023)−0.025 (0.028)0.1363,566
Δ Health care
Husband alone0.001 (0.041)−0.027 (0.047)−0.006 (0.049)0.7413,579
Husband and wife jointly0.159** (0.062)−0.072 (0.065)−0.066 (0.064)0.4363,579
Wife alone−0.103** (0.040)0.170*** (0.053)0.090 (0.055)0.4183,579
Δ Ceremonies
Husband alone0.035 (0.041)−0.005 (0.051)0.026 (0.054)0.7243,571
Husband and wife jointly0.182*** (0.059)−0.034 (0.064)0.042 (0.065)0.1883,571
Wife alone−0.137*** (0.039)0.095* (0.056)−0.019 (0.060)0.6303,571
Δ Child education
Husband alone−0.019 (0.049)−0.075 (0.055)−0.021 (0.057)0.2543,456
Husband and wife jointly0.105 (0.064)−0.091 (0.073)−0.095 (0.077)0.9093,456
Wife alone−0.168*** (0.055)0.084 (0.053)−0.002 (0.062)0.3903,456
Δ Child clothing
Husband alone0.004 (0.052)−0.048 (0.056)−0.012 (0.059)0.6603,495
Husband and wife jointly0.104 (0.072)−0.139** (0.066)−0.125* (0.074)0.7663,495
Wife alone−0.150** (0.060)0.129** (0.054)0.037 (0.061)0.8353,495
Δ Adult women clothing
Husband alone0.003 (0.058)−0.005 (0.056)−0.005 (0.072)0.9843,572
Husband and wife jointly0.247*** (0.075)−0.103 (0.071)−0.001 (0.077)0.2623,572
Wife alone−0.195*** (0.060)0.099 (0.062)−0.002 (0.075)0.3823,572

Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the VDC level are in parentheses. Each row represents a separate regression where Returned and Left represent dummies that describe the change in the husband's migrant status between the previous and current periods. Gone is a dummy indicating that the migrant was gone in both the base period and the current period. The P-value is from an F-test testing for equality between the absolute value of the Returned coefficient and Left coefficient. Controls for the base period are included. The control set across all regressions includes a separate dummy each for various shocks (the household experienced a natural disaster aside from the 2015 earthquake, serious illness, death of a household member, falling agricultural prices, decrease in income, or loss of employment), a Mercalli scale measure of earthquake intensity at the VDC level, a dummy indicating whether the husband has migration experience, a dummy indicating a resident mother-in-law, a dummy indicating a resident father-in-law, and a separate dummy each indicating when the control is missing. Zeros are imputed for missing values. Outcome variables are fractions of decisions over which the decision-making power is distributed as described. Note that children's clothing includes expenditures on school uniforms. See Section C of the Appendix for more details on how these variables are composed.

* p ≤ 0.10,

** p ≤ 0.05,

*** p ≤ 0.01.

VDC, village development committee.

Language: English
Accepted on: Nov 20, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Sarah Janzen, Savannah Noray, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.