Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Social media use in international marketing: Impact on brand and firm performance Cover

Social media use in international marketing: Impact on brand and firm performance

Open Access
|Jun 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Conceptual model of the research.Source: Own elaboration.
Conceptual model of the research.Source: Own elaboration.

Figure 2

Estimated structural equation model for relationships of social media marketing with brand and firm performance.Source: Own elaboration.SM, social media; SMM, SM marketing.
Estimated structural equation model for relationships of social media marketing with brand and firm performance.Source: Own elaboration.SM, social media; SMM, SM marketing.

Regression weights and significance levels in the structural model (estimation with the bootstrapping method using 5,000 resamples)

Regression pathsRegression weights (beta)t-statisticsp-values
Customer orientation →SMM engagement: Market research0.1761.8450.066
Customer orientation →SMM engagement: Brand equity creation0.4303.7890.000
Customer orientation →SMM engagement: Sales support0.1111.1910.234
Customer orientation →SMM engagement: Information dissemination0.3353.4220.001
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Market research0.0380.3910.696
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Brand equity creation0.0721.1520.250
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Sales support0.0470.5190.604
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Information dissemination0.0320.4350.663
SMM engagement: Market research → Brand performance−0.0270.40.689
SMM engagement: Brand equity creation → Brand performance0.4985.8660.000
SMM engagement: Sales support → Brand performance0.1142.9550.003
SMM engagement: Information dissemination → Brand performance−0.0621.0920.275
Customer orientation → Brand performance−0.0160.2270.821
Brand orientation → Brand performance0.0551.2770.202
SM content localization → Brand performance0.1191.8040.072
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement → Brand performance0.1512.4760.014
Control over SMM → Brand performance0.0581.1980.231
Customer orientation * Market research → Brand performance0.0891.7420.082
SM content localization * Information dissemination → Brand performance0.0992.1610.031
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement * Market research → Brand performance−0.1522.4290.016
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement * Brand equity creation → Brand performance−0.2813.8540.000
Control over SMM * Sales support → Brand performance−0.0921.8390.067
Brand performance→ ROA0.0922.5610.011

Comparison of regression weights in the structural model for firms with only Polish capital and those controlled fully or partially by foreign owners

Regression pathsRegression weightsDifferenceModulus of difference

Only Polish capitalSome or all foreign capital
Customer orientation → SMM engagement: Brand equity creation0.4480.2140.2340.234*
SMM engagement: Brand equity creation → Brand performance0.4260.647−0.2210.221*
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Information dissemination0.0870.259−0.1720.172*
Customer orientation → Brand performance0.0380.210−0.1720.172*
SM content localization → Brand performance0.2110.0490.1620.162*
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement * Market research → Brand performance0.2460.0910.1550.155*
Customer orientation → SMM engagement: Information dissemination0.3500.2170.1330.133
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Market research0.1420.264−0.1220.122
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement * Brand equity creation → Brand performance0.2870.1760.1110.111
Control over SMM → Brand performance0.0410.135−0.0940.094
Customer orientation → SMM engagement: Market research0.1790.0880.0910.091
Control over SMM * Sales support → Brand performance0.0660.139−0.0730.073
SM content localization * Information dissemination → Brand performance0.0710.144−0.0730.073
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Sales support0.0650.0050.0600.06
Customer orientation → SMM engagement: Sales support0.1560.1080.0480.048
Brand orientation → SMM engagement: Brand equity creation0.1290.0870.0420.042
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement → Brand performance0.1650.1300.0350.035
Brand performance→ ROA0.0990.0780.0210.021
SMM engagement: Market research → Brand performance0.090.0710.0190.019
Brand orientation → Brand performance0.0560.0390.0170.017
SMM engagement: Information dissemination → Brand performance0.0880.0770.0110.011
SMM engagement: Sales support → Brand performance0.1090.1030.0060.006
Customer orientation * Market research → Brand performance0.1070.1050.0020.002

Likert-scale items used to provide indicators for reflective construct in the study, along with their literature sources and metrics of reliability and validity

Likert-scale items (1 – completely disagree, 5 – completely agree)Factor loadingsSources
Customer orientation (AVE = 0.544; composite reliability = 0.877)
We constantly monitor our customers’ needs0.762Mueller et al. [2001]
We are aware of how customers perceive our brands and products0.769Deshpandé et al. [1993]
In our organization, employees receive incentives based on customer satisfaction measures0.657Dutot and Bergeron [2016]; Trainor et al. [2014]
In our organization, business processes are designed to enhance the quality of customer interactions0.702
In our organization, various functional areas coordinate their activities to enhance the quality of customer experience0.785
Customer needs always come first, even before the requirements of our owners/shareholders0.744
Brand orientation (AVE = 0.560; composite reliability = 0.910)
Branding flows through all our marketing activities0.734Wong and Merrilees [2008], and own elaboration
All our departments that contribute to marketing decision-making are also involved in branding0.655
Branding is essential to our strategy0.786
Our brands are the strategic starting point for all our business operations0.803
Long-term brand planning is critical to our future success0.748
Our brands are an important asset to us0.593
Everyone in our company appreciates that branding is the priority for our business0.841
All our business decisions are assessed in terms of how they affect our brands0.794
SMM engagement: Brand equity creation (AVE = 0.606; composite reliability = 0.901)
We use SM to involve customers in online communities for our key brand0.807Dutot and Bergeron [2016], and own elaboration
We use SM for creating the desired image of our key brand0.870
We use SM to distinguish our key brand from that of competitors0.847
We react swiftly to changes in customer needs and behavior revealed by SM0.679
SM activities by our different departments are well coordinated0.626
We follow SM to make sure that our key brand is viewed favorably by customers0.810
SMM engagement: Information dissemination (AVE = 0.734; composite reliability = 0.917)
We have frequent interdepartmental meetings to discuss market trends identified via SM0.900Trainor et al. [2014]
Marketing personnel spend time discussing customers’ future needs identified on SM applications with other departments0.882
Data collected using SM on customer satisfaction are disseminated at all levels on a regular basis0.840
When one department finds out something important about competitors using SM, it is quick to alert other departments0.801
SMM engagement: Market research (AVE = 0.543; composite reliability = 0.768)
We use SM to conduct market research0.978Dutot and Bergeron [2016], Trainor et al. [2014], and own elaboration
We use SM to detect changes in our customers’ product preferences0.647
SM are instrumental in collecting vital data for enhancing customers’ loyalty toward our key brand0.504
SMM engagement (AVE = 0.549; composite reliability = 0.708)
We enable customers to buy our products via SM0.752Dutot and Bergeron [2016], and own elaboration
Consumers can report and resolve complaints using our SM apps0.729
SM content localization (AVE = 0.677; composite reliability = 0.912)
Our key brand's SM profiles are run in the languages of the countries where we sell our products0.648Own elaboration based on Okazaki and Rivas [2002]; Witek-Hajduk [2018]
We adjust the content of our key brand's SM profiles to the cultural specificity of the countries where we sell our products0.857
We adapt creative strategies in SM (including sales arguments, emotional references, and symbolism) to the cultural values of the target countries0.821
We adjust the content of the posts that we publish on SM to the specific characteristics of our customers0.862
We make sure that the layouts of our key brand's SM profiles are in agreement with the cultural specificity of our customers0.903
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement (AVE = 0.509; composite reliability = 0.744)
We cooperate with internationally recognized influencers/bloggers0.505Own elaboration based on Witek-Hajduk [2018]
We cooperate with influencers/bloggers who are known only locally in the target country0.625
We encourage our partners in foreign countries (franchisees, distributors, retailers, and so on) to promote our key brand in SM0.939
Control over SMM (AVE = 0.505; composite reliability = 0.752)
Our headquarters coordinates our key brand's SM communication strategy in the countries where we sell our products0.699Own elaboration based on Witek-Hajduk [2018]
Our headquarters provides our local foreign-country partners with guidelines and content for publishing in SM0.645
Posts and other brand-related content are published by our local partners in SM only with our agreement0.780

Discriminant validity of reflective constructs according to the Fornell–Larcker criterion

Control over SMMSM content localizationCustomer orientationBrand orientationForeign partners’ SMM involvementSM engagement: Market ResearchSM engagement: Brand equity creationSM engagement: Sales supportSM engagement: Information dissemination
Control over SMM0.710
SM content localization0.2640.823
Customer orientation0.2090.2990.738
Brand orientation0.1810.1790.5450.748
Foreign partners’ SMM involvement0.1170.1300.0810.1300.714
SM engagement: Market Research0.2750.2450.1970.1340.2680.737
SM engagement: Brand equity creation0.2720.6460.4690.3060.0970.2280.778
SM engagement: Sales support0.1280.2620.1370.1080.0840.1260.2610.741
SM engagement: Information dissemination0.2660.3500.3180.1510.1770.4890.5000.2220.856
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 142
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2022
Published on: Jun 30, 2022
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Marzanna K. Witek-Hajduk, Piotr Zaborek, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.