Proposing an innovation-based view of the firm

Costello, Gabriel J.

doi:10.2478/ijm-2018-0006

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on theories of the firm and argues for the importance of an innovation-based view (IBV). In doing so, it examines the incumbent management theories of the firm, resource-based view (RBV), knowledge-based view (KBV) and dynamic capabilities, considering the recent developments in the academic literature and in the nature of the firm. The research approach of abduction (conceiving of theory) proposed by Peirce and described by Van de Ven is used. A conceptual framework that incorporates the growing influence of information and communications technology and open innovation on the characteristics of the firm is developed. The managerial tradition that originated in the scholarship of Edith Penrose is used to develop the framework, as opposed to the lens of economic ‘black box’ theories.

References

Allen, T.J. (2004). ‘Communication networks in R&D laboratories,’ in R. Katz (ed), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings, 2nd ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Almirall, E. and Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010). ‘Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence’. Academy of Management Review, 35: 27-47.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Angle, H.L. and Van De Ven, A.H. (2000). ‘Suggestions for managing the innovation journey’, in A.H. Van De Ven, H.L. Angle and M.S. Poole (eds), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies (First Published 1989) Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Banville, C. and Landry, M. (1989). ‘Can the field of MIS be disciplined’? Communication of the ACM, 32: 48-60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barney, J.B. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17: 99-120.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basadur, M. and Gelade, G.A. (2006). ‘The role of knowledge management in the innovation process’. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15: 45-62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Becerra, M. (2009). Theory of the Firm for Strategic Management: Economic Value Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. (1999). ‘Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance’. Mis Quarterly, 23: 3-16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C. and Barsoux, J.-L. (2011). ‘The 5 myths of innovation’. Sloan Management Review 52: 43-50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brynjolfsson, E. and Saunders, A. (2009). Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology Is Reshaping the Economy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chamberlin, T.C. (1890). ‘The method of multiple working hypotheses.’ Science, 15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. (1998). Information Systems and Information Systems Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology Boston: Harvard Business School.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). ‘Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation’, in H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (eds), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, C.M., Yang, W., Verlinden, M.C. and King, S.M. (2005). Chip industry must learn not to overshoot. EE Timeshttp://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1154483 [Accessed May 2015].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coakes, E. (2000). ‘Knowledge management: A sociotechnical perspective’, in E. Coakes, D. Willis and S. Clarke (eds), Knowledge Management in the Sociotechnical World: The Graffiti Continues London: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Colarelli-O’CONNOR, G. (2008). ‘Major innovation as a dynamic capability: A systems approach’. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25: 313-330.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conboy, K. (2009). ‘Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development’. Information Systems Research, 20: 329-354.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costello, G.J. and Donnellan, B. (2007). ‘The diffusion of WOZ: Expanding the topology of IS innovations’, Journal of Information Technology 22: 79-86. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000085
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costello, G.J. and Donnellan, B. (2008). ‘Seeking the face of innovation with the ethical compass of Emmanuel Levinas’, in G. León, A. Bernardos, J. Casar, K. Kautz, and J. Degross, (eds.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 287, Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion Boston: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Oxford: Blackwell Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M. and Avellaneda, C.N. (2009). ‘Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations’. Journal of Management Studies 46: 650-675 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davis, C. (1996). Levinas: An Introduction, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dimache, A. and Roche, T. (2013). ‘A decision methodology to support servitisation of manufacturing’. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dodgson, M., Gann, D. and Salter, A. (2005). Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation, and Organization Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Douma, S. and Schreuder, H. (2008). Economic Approaches to Organizations 4th edn, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles London: Heinemann.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drucker, P. (1988). The Coming of the New Organization Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dubin, R. (1976). ‘Theory building in applied areas’, in M. Dunnette (ed) Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology Chicago: Rand McNally.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dubin, R. (1978). Theory Development, New York: Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eppinger, S.D. (2001). ‘Innovation at the speed of information’. Harvard Business Review, 79: 149-158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fagerberg, J. (2005). ‘Innovation: A guide to the literature’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffin, K. and Mitchell, R. (2005). Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation Using the Pentathlon Framework, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grant, R.M. (1996). ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helfat, C.E. and Peteraf, M.A. (2009). ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path’. Strategic Organization 7: 91-102.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hookway, C.J. (2005). ‘Peirce, Charles Sanders’, in T. Honderich (ed), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan, W.P. and Yiu, D. (1999). ‘Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum’. Journal of Management, 25: 417-456.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Katz, R. (2004). ‘Introduction’, in R. Katz (ed), The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation: A Collection of Readings 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keen, P. (1980). ‘Mis research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition’. in E. Mclean (ed), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems Philadelphia, 9-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keen, P. (1991). ‘Relevance and rigor in information systems research: Improving quality, confidence cohesion and impact’, in H. Nissen, H. Klein and R. Hirschheim (eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klein, P.G., Mahoney, J.T., Mcgahan, A.M. and Pitelis, C.N. (2010). ‘Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship’. European Management Review, 7: 1-15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C. and Groen, A. J. (2010). ‘The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques’. Journal of Management, 36: 349-372.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P. (2002). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lazonick, W. (2005). ‘The Innovative Firm’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leonard, D. (1998). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lévinas, E. (1998). Otherwise Than Being, or, Beyond Essence, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Macintyre, A.C. (2002). A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the 20th Century London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Markus, M.L. and Saunders, C. (2007). ‘Looking for a few good concepts ... and theories ... for the information systems field’. MIS Quarterly 31: iii-vi.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mcinerney, D.P.A. (2004). Innovative Regions: A Comparative Analysis of the Innovative Activities of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the Shannon and Dublin Regions of Ireland, PhD Thesis. University of Limerick, Ireland.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Metcalfe, M. (2004). ‘Theory: seeking a plain English explanation’. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6: 13-21.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mol, M.J. and Birkinshaw, J. (2009). ‘The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices’. Journal of Business Research 62: 1269-1280.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neavel Dickens, L. (1998). A Theory of Action Perspective of Action Research, PhD Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Brien, J.A. and Marakas, G.M. (2009). Management Information Systems Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data 3rd edn, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peirce, C.S. (2010). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Volume 8, 1890-1892/Edited by the Peirce Edition Project Bloomington, IN: University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm with a New Introduction by Christos N. Pitelis Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peteraf, M.A. (1993). ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view’. Strategic Management Journal 14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pettigrew, A.M. (1987). ‘Introduction: Researching strategic change’, in A.M. Pettigrew (ed.), The Management of Strategic Change Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pfaffenberger, B. (2002). Computers in Your Future Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pitelis, C.N. and Teece, D.J. (2009). ‘The (new) nature and essence of the firm’. European Management Review 6: 5-15. doi: 10.1057/emr.2009.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Poole, M.S. and Van De Ven, A.H. (2000). ‘Towards a general theory of innovation processes’, in A.H. Van De Ven, H.L. Angle and M.S. Poole (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Post, G.V. and Anderson, D.L. (2003). Management Information Systems: Solving Business Problems with Information Technology Boston; London, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pullen, A., Petra C. De Weerd-Nederhof, Groen, A.J. and Fisscher, O.A.M. (2012). ‘Open innovation in practice: Goal complementarity and closed Npd networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector’. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29: 917-934.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rahmanseresht, H. (1988). ‘Towards a revised model of innovation in organisations’, PhD Thesis. University of Hull.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robson, W. (1997). Strategic Management and Information Systems: An Integrated Approach London: Pitman Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach New York, NY: The Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rothwell, R. (1994). ‘Towards the fifth-generation innovation process’. International Marketing Review 11: 7-31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sautet, F. (2000). Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1959 printing).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scruton, R. (2004). Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey London: Pimlico.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Slappendel, C. (1996). ‘Perspectives on innovation in organizations’. Organization Studies, 17: 107-129.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spender, J.C. (1996). ‘Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm’. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 45-62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storey, J. (2004). The Management of Innovation: Volume I Cheltenham, UK: Northampton Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suppe, F. (1999). ‘Abduction’, in: R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Svennevig, J. (2001). ‘Abduction as a methodological approach to the study of spoken interaction’. Norskrift 103: 1-22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swanson, E.B. (1994). ‘Information systems innovation among organizations’. Management Science 40: 1069-1092.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swedberg, R. (1991). Joseph A. Schumpeter: His Life and Work Cambridge: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal 18: 509-533.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tsai, W. (2004). ‘Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, 2001, Academy of Management Journal, 44: 996-1004’, in J. Storey (ed.), The Management of Innovation: Volume II. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van De Ven, A.H. (1986). ‘Central problems in the management of innovation’. Management Science 32: 590-607.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van De Ven, A.H. (ed.) (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van De Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L. and Poole, M.S. (eds.) (2000). Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vanhaverbeke, W. and Cloodt, M. (2006). ‘Open innovation in value networks’, in H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (eds.) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Volberda, H.W., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D. and Heij, C.V. (2013). ‘Management innovation: management as fertile ground for innovation’. European Management Review 10: 1-15. doi: 10.1111/emre.12007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Von Hippel, E. and Von Krogh, G. (2003). ‘Open source software and the “Private-Collective” innovation model: issues for organization science’. Organization Science 14: 209-223.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Walton, R.E. (1987). Innovating to Compete San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ward, J., Grifiths, P. and Whitmore, P. (1990). Strategic Planning for Information Systems Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005). ‘Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice’. Mis Quarterly 29: 35-57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002). ‘Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review’. Mis Quarterly 26: xiii-xxiii.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weick, K. (1989). ‘Theory construction as disciplined imagination’. Academy of Management Review 14: 516-531.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). ‘A resource-based view of the firm’. Strategic Management Journal 5: 99-197.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Chesbrough, H. (2006). ‘Open innovation: a research agenda’, in H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (eds.) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whelan, E., Parise, S., Valk, J.D. and Aalbers, R. (2011). ‘Creating employee networks that deliver open innovation’. Mit Sloan Management Review 53: 37-45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whetten, D.A. (1989). ‘What constitutes a theoretical contribution’? Academy of Management Review 14: 490-495.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson, J.Q. (1966). ‘Innovation in organizations: notes toward a theory’, in J.D. Thompson (ed.), Approaches to Organizational Design Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolfe, R.A. (1994). ‘Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions’. Journal of Management Studies 31: 405-431.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yin, R., Heald, K. and Vogel, M. (1977). Tinkering with the System: Technological Innovations in State and Local Services Toronto: Lexington Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zain, M. (1993). ‘A field study of adoption and implementations of innovations by manufacturing firms in Malaysia’, PhD Thesis. Manchester Business School.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R. and Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and Organizations New York: Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article