Testing the iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) for the use with chronic disease patients in Switzerland / Prüfung des iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) für den Einsatz bei Patienten/-innen mit chronischen Krankheiten in der Schweiz
References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014).
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing . American Educational Research Association. - Amler, N. (2016).
Produktivität, Präsentismus und Arbeitsfähigkeit—Konzepte und Instrumente . Health Economics Research Zentrum HERZ. - Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures.
Spine ,25 (24), 3186–3191. - Bouwmans, C., Hakkaart-von Roijen, L., Koopmanschap, M., & Krol, M. (2013).
Productivity Costs Questionnaire—Manual . Institute for Medical Technology Assessments – Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. - Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014).
InterViews . Sage Publications. - Bundesamt für Statistik, B. (2021).
Teilzeitarbeit . https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/wirtschaftliche-soziale-situation-bevoelkerung/gleichstellung-frau-mann/erwerbstaetigkeit/teilzeitarbeit.html. - Collins, D., d’Ardenne, J., Blake, M., & Gray, M. (2015).
Cognitive Interviewing Practice . Sage. - d’Ardenne, J., & Collins, D. (2015). Data Management. In D. Collins (Hrsg.),
Cognitive Interviewing Practice (S. 142–161). Sage. - Friedli, T., Villiger, P. M., & Gantschnig, B. E. (2018). Workability for persons with chronic diseases. A systematic review of validity and utility of assessments in German language.
International Journal of Health Professions, 5 (1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2018-0008. - iMTA. (o. J.).
Questionnaires for the measurement of costs in economic evaluations . iMTA. https://www.imta.nl/questionnaires/ (Zugriff am 12.10.2021). - Johannesson, M., & Karlsson, G. (1997). The friction cost method: A comment.
Journal of Health Economics, 16 (2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00006-4. - Kim, H., Park, K. S., Yoo, J.-E., Kim, S., Han, S., & Suh, H. S. (2020). Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire.
Healthcare, 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020184. - Patton, M. Q. (2015).
Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4. Aufl.). Sage. - Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017).
Nursing Research—Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (10th Edition). Wolters Kluwer. Register für Patienten für chronischen Schmerz . (2018). [Patientenund Qualitätsregister]. Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie.- Schulze, C., Page, J., Kottorp, A., & Lilja, M. (2013). Adapting functional assessments for use in a new context: A balancing act.
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20 (5), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2013.802010. - Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content.
Psicothema, 26 (1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256. - Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2014). „Analysis: Practices, principles and processes“ in Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Hrsg.),
Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (Second edition, S. 199–218). Sage. - Tan, S. S., Bouwmans, C. A. M., Rutten, F. F. H., & Hakkaart-von Roijen, L. (2012). Update of the Dutch Manual for Costing in Economic Evaluations.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28 (2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000062. - Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Hrsg.),
Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (S. 73–100). National Academy Press. - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2009, Dezember 9).
Guidance for Industry on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; Availability . Federal Register. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2022-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2296-990X
Language: English, German
Page range: 25 - 38
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2021
Accepted on: May 3, 2022
Published on: Jun 22, 2022
Published by: ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Thomas Friedli, Brigitte Gantschnig, published by ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.