References
- Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, Van Der Westhuizen HM, Von Delft A, Price A, Fridman L, Tang LH, Tang V, Watson GL, Bax CE, Shaikh R, Questier F, Hernandez D, Chu LF, Ramirez CM, Rimoin AW. An Evidence Review of Face Masks Against COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2020; 118(4): e2014564118.
- Ajaj R, Dweik RA, Ali SAS, Stietiya MH. Life Cycle Assessment Studies to Evaluate the Sustainability of Various Facemasks Used During COVID-19: A UAE Case Study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023; 11(5): 110491.
- The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Fighting COVID-19 China in Action, 2020,
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-06/07/content_5517737.htm (accessed on 19 May 2024). - Akarsu C, Madenli Ö, Deveci EÜ. Characterization of Littered Face Masks in the Southeastern Part of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 28(34): 47517–47527.
- Shen M, Zeng Z, Song B, Yi H, Hu T, Zhang Y, Zeng G, Xiao R. Neglected Microplastics Pollution in Global COVID-19: Disposable Surgical Masks. Science of the Total Environment 2021; 790: 148130.
- Chua MH, Cheng W, Goh SS, Kong J, Li B, Lim JYC, Mao L, Wang S, Xue K, Yang L, Ye E, Zhang K, Cheong WCD, Tan BH, Li Z, Tan BH, Loh XJ. Face Masks in the New COVID-19 Normal: Materials, Testing, and Perspectives. Research 2020; 2020: 7286735.
- Lyu L, Peng H, An CJ, Sun H, Yang X, Bi H. An Insight into the Benefits of Substituting Polypropylene with Biodegradable Polylactic Acid Face Masks for Combating Environmental Emissions. Science of the Total Environment 2023; 905: 167137.
- Priya A, Dutta K, Daverey A. A Comprehensive Biotechnological and Molecular Insight into Plastic Degradation by Microbial Community. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 2022; 97(2): 381–390.
- Shanmugam V, Babu K, Garrison TF, Capezza AJ, Olsson RT, Ramakrishna S, Hedenqvist MS, Singha S, Bartoli M, Giorcelli M, Sas G, Försth M, Das O, Restás Á, Berto F. Potential Natural Polymer-Based Nanofibres for the Development of Facemasks in Countering Viral Outbreaks. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2021; 138(27): 50658.
- Liu YJ, Zhang JS, Situ YS. Spunbond and Meltblown Nonwoven Fabric Handbook. China Textile & Apparel Press, 2014.
- Situ YS, Li ZH. Meltblown Nonwoven Technology. China Textile & Apparel Press, 2022.
- Zheng J, Suh S. Strategies to Reduce the Global Carbon Footprint of Plastics. Nature Climate Change 2019; 9(5): 374–378.
- Liang H, Huang QW. Analysis of the Impact of Disposable Masks on the Natural Environment. Popular Standardization 2022; (24): 104–106.
- Wiedmann T, Minx J. A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’. Ecological Economics Research Trends 2008; 1–11.
- Do Thi HT, Mizsey P, Toth AJ. Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability 2021; 13(22): 12574.
- Van Straten B, Ligtelijn S, Droog L, Putman E, Dankelman J, Sperna Weiland NH, Horeman T. A Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessing Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Scientific Reports 2021; 11(1): 17680.
- Angelis-Dimakis A, Whitehouse A, Vyrkou A, Hebden A, Rana S, Goswami P. Life Cycle Environmental Impact and Economic Assessment of British Wool Face Masks. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2022; 6: 100084.
- Li Y, Tang Y, Liu M, Yuan X, Zuo J, Feng K, Wang Q, Ma Q, Mu R, Wang W, Hong J. Life-Cycle Assessment Reveals Disposable Surgical Masks in 2020–2022 Led to More Than 18 million Tons of Carbon Emissions. One Earth 2023; 6(9): 1258–1268.
- Zuo SY, Chen YH, Zeng C, Wu AH, Ren N, Huang X. Application Scope and Relevant Standards of Masks in Various Countries. Chinese Journal of Infection Control 2020; 19(2): 109–116.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14067: 2018 Greenhouse Gases-Carbon Footprint of Products-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, in Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University, 2013.
- Luo Y, Yu M, Wu X, Ding X, Wang L. Carbon Footprint Assessment of Face Masks in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Based on Different Protective Performance and Applicable Scenarios. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023; 387: 135854.
- Shao ZY, Liu L. Comparative Evaluation of Stocking Products Based on Product Life Cycle Assessment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 680(1): 012033.
- Yang S. Study on the Calculation of Carbon Emission in the Whole Life Cycle of Building Steel Structure Engineering. Shandong Jianzhu University, 2023.
- Vilén A. Environmental Impact of Activated Carbon Production from Various Raw Materials. Master’s Programme in Water and Environmental Engineering 2021; 104+32.
- Xin CL, Zhang YM, Jiang BW, Li Y, Liu SX, Han DL, Qi XZ. Comparative Study of the Life-Cycle Environmental Impact of All Carbon Black/Silica Tires. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science) 2023; 50(4): 98–106.
- Zhao GJ, You YJ, Huang QS. Carbon Footprint Assessment Method of Corrugated Medium on Life Cycle Assessment. China Pulp & Paper 2021; 40(8): 40–44.
- Shen L, Worrell E, Patel MK. Environmental Impact Assessment of Man-made Cellulose Fibres. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010; 55(2): 260–274.
- Muka I, Huba A. The Comparison of Solid Silicone Rubber Types Manufactured by Diverse Technologies. Materials Science Forum 2008; 589: 123–129.
- Yu MF. Study on Environmental Impact of Epidemic Prevention Mask Based on Life Cycle Assessment. Donghau University, 2022.
- Lee AWL, Neo ERK, Khoo ZY, Yeo Z, Tan YS, Chng S, Yan W, Lok BK, Low JSC. Life Cycle Assessment of Single-Use Surgical and Embedded Filtration Layer (EFL) Reusable Face Mask. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2021; 170: 105580.
- Atılgan Türkmen B. Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Disposable Medical Masks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29: 25496–25506.
- Özbek MO, Van Santen RA. The Mechanism of Ethylene Epoxidation Catalysis. Catalysis letters 2013; 143: 131–141.