Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Synanthropic flora of the afforestation belts of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine Cover

Synanthropic flora of the afforestation belts of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

The map scheme of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.

Table 1.

Taxonomic structure of the flora in the studied afforestation belts.

NatApoAl
Asteraceae14.52.325.616.9
Rosaceae9.8173.77.7
Poaceae6.89.14.96.7
Apiaceae6.81.114.64.6
Lamiaceae4.72.36.16.2
Caryophyllaceae4.32.38.51.5
Fabaceae3.42.32.46.2
Sapindaceae2.63.404.6
Brassicaceae2.602.46.2
Cyperaceae2.15.700
Other42.454.531.839.9
Sum of the first 1057.645.568.260.1
Table 2.

Comparison of separate indicators in the compared floras.

Flora of the afforestation belts of the studied regionFlora of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe (Bayrak, 1997)Forest and shrub flora of the Northern Black Sea region (Solomakha et al., 2015)Flora of Southeastern Ukraine (Burda, 1991)
Asteraceae/Cyperaceae6.82.594.73.6
Asteraceae/Poaceae2.1251.51.571.56
Cyperaceae/Fabaceae0.6250.940.5470.631
Number of species/genera1.452.772.333.1
Table 3.

Biomorphological structure of the flora of the afforestation belts according to Raunkier's classification of biological types (Nat – natural, Apo – apophytic, Aln – alien flora).

Raunkier's biological typesSumNatApoAln
Hemicryptophyte35.96.021.58.4
Phanerophyte21.216.20.05.0
Nanophanerophyte13.97.93.22.8
Therophyte13.80.07.95.8
Chamaephyte11.70.72.88.2
Geophyte3.42.20.80.4
Other0.10.10.00.1
Table 4.

The distribution of species with various strategies in the flora of the afforestation belts.

Graim's strategy typeSumNatApoAln
C (competitors)44.218.515.510.3
R (ruderals)27.16.612.18.4
S (stress-tolerant)28.712.811.64.3
Total10037.939.223
Table 5.

Distribution of the number of species of different types of life forms by layers in the natural and synanthropic flora of the afforestation belts.

The life form of a speciesSumNatApoAln
Herbaceous73.221.733.617.9
Shrubs15.38.91.35.1
Trees11.56.804.7
Total10037.434.927.7
Table 6.

The top 10 species that form the main layers in afforestation belts are sorted by their constancy-abundance index values.

Species/LayerGroupConstancy, %Abundance-average, %Constancy-Abundance Indicator, %
Tree layer
Quercus roburnatural75.456.065.0
Fraxinus excelsiornatural46.328.036.0
Acer platanoidesnatural32.323.027.2
Acer negundokenophyte38.315.024.0
Ulmus laevisnatural35.116.023.7
Tilia cordatanatural11.935.020.4
Robinia pseudoacaciakenophyte13.032.020.4
Fraxinus pennsylvanicakenophyte5.639.014.8
Ulmus minornatural4.635.012.6
Populus nigranatural4.931.012.3
Shrub layer
Sambucus nigrahemiapophyte57.915.029.5
Caragana arborescenskenophyte23.513.017.5
Ptelea trifoliatakenophyte7.418.016.7
Acer tataricumnatural21.412.016.0
Prunus spinosanatural20.05.010.0
Parthenocissus quinquefoliakenophyte3.227.09.2
Cornus sanguineanatural13.35.08.2
Euonymus europaeusnatural15.14.07.8
Cotinus coggygriakenophyte4.214.07.7
Crataegus rhipidophyllanatural19.73.07.7
Herbaceous layer
Chelidonium majusapophyte48.120.031.0
Impatiens parviflorakenophyte11.937.021.0
Elytrigia repensapophyte48.88.019.8
Ballota nigraarchaeophyte52.66.017.8
Urtica dioicahemiapophyte39.36.015.4
Alliaria petiolataapophyte21.111.015.2
Geum urbanumhemiapophyte48.44.013.9
Poa nemoralisnatural27.06.012.7
Galium aparineapophyte37.94.012.3
Poa angustifolianatural13.010.011.4
Table 7.

The ratio of diagnostic species of different vegetation classes in the natural and synanthropic flora of the afforestation belts.

NatApoAln
1.Carpino-Fagetea17.413.93.40.1
2.Epilobietea angustifolii14.40.810.53.1
3.Robinietea12.91.75.65.6
4.Artemisietea vulgaris8.80.14.54.1
5.Molinio-Arrhenatheretea6.01.44.60.0
6.Crataego-Prunetea5.54.40.01.1
7.Trifolio-Geranietea4.43.31.20.0
8.Quercetea roboripetraeae4.24.10.00.1
9.Festuco-Brometea3.61.51.11.0
10.Sisymbrietea3.00.00.92.0
Total80.231.232.017.1
Table 8.

Ratio of indigenous (local) and alien species in the species composition of the afforestation belts.

CategoriesSpecies groupCountFraction, %
Indigenous species17072.3
Natural8837.4
Hemiapophytes4017.0
Apophytes4217.9
Alien species6527.7
Archaophytes2711.5
Kenophytes3816.2
Total235100
Table 9.

Top five archaeophyte and kenophyte species based on their participation in afforestation belts communities (C, % – constancy; A, % – average projective cover; CAI – combined constancy-abundance geometric mean).

RankArcheophytesC, %A, %CAI, %KenophytesC, %A, %CAI, %
1Ballota nigra52.66.017.8Acer negundo38.315.024.0
2Lactuca serriola39.72.08.9Impatiens parviflora11.937.021.0
3Anthriscus cerefolium4.215.07.9Robinia pseudoacacia13.032.020.4
4Fallopia convolvulus18.63.07.5Caragana arborescens23.513.017.5
5Artemisia absinthium22.52.06.7Fraxinus pennsylvanica5.639.014.8
Average (by column)27.55.69.818.527.219.5
Table 10.

The ratio of alien species with different degrees of naturalization in the afforestation belts.

CategoriesDegree of naturalizationCountFraction, %
Stable (naturalized) species
Agriophytes812.3
Hemiagriophytes812.3
Epekophytes3350.8
Non-stable species
Colonophytes1421.5
Ephemerophytes23.1
Total65100
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2025-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English, Estonian
Page range: 12 - 26
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 23, 2026
Published on: Oct 18, 2026
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Igor Goncharenko, Vasyl Shevchyk, Tetiana Dvirna, Igor Solomakha, Vasyl Konishchuk, Inna Shumyhai, Pavlo Dushko, Vasyl Martynenko, Volodymyr Solomakha, Oksana Drebot, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.