Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Alien trees and shrubs of Latvia – evaluation of current status and invasiveness Cover

Alien trees and shrubs of Latvia – evaluation of current status and invasiveness

Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. Andersen, M.C., Adams, H., Hope, B., Powell, M. 2004. Risk assessment for invasive species. – Risk Analysis, 24(4), 787–793.
  2. Andreu, J., Vilá, M. 2010. Risk analysis of potential invasive plants in Spain. – Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(1), 34–44.
  3. Anonymous. 2019. Alien Species Database. The North European and Baltic Network on Invasive Alien Species. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.nobanis.org. [Accessed 23 November 2019].
  4. Anonymous. 2021. Latvijas Stādi. [WWW document]. – URL http://latvijasstadi.lv/en. [Accessed 27 November 2021]. (In Latvian).
  5. Bialozyt, R., Bradley, L.R., Bradshaw, R.H.W. 2012. Modelling the spread of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies in southern Scandinavia during the late Holocene. – Journal of Biogeography, 39(4), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02665.x.
  6. Burgiel, S.W., Muir, A.A. 2010. Invasive Species, Climate Change and Ecosystem - Based Adaptation: Addressing Multiple Drivers of Global Change. Washington, DC, US, and Nairobi, Kenya. Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP). 55 pp.
  7. Cinovskis, R., Janele, I., Skujeniece, I., Zvirgzds, A. 1974. Trees and Shrubs of Latvian Rural Parks. (Koki un krūmi Latvijas lauku parkos). Rīga, Zinātne. 347 pp. (In Latvian).
  8. Cinovskis, R., Mauriņš, A., Zvirgzds, A. 1991. Skrīveri Arboretum. (Skrīveru dendrārijs). Rīga, Zvaigzne. 114 pp. (In Latvian).
  9. Crossman, N.D., Bryan, B.A., Cooke, D.A. 2011. An invasive plant and climate change threat index for weed risk management: Integrating habitat distribution pattern and dispersal process. – Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 183–198.
  10. Elton, C.S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animal and Plants. Boston, Springer. 181 pp.
  11. Evarts-Bunders, P. 2005. Genus Willows (Salix L.) in Latvia. (Vītolu (Salix L.) ģints Latvijā). Daugavpils, University of Daugavpils. 107 pp. (In Latvian).
  12. Evarts-Bunders, P., Bojāre, A., Evarte-Bundere, G. 2021. Kalsnava Arboretum Dendrological Collection. Daugavpils University. Occurrence dataset. [WWW document]. – URL https://doi.org/10.15468/ymhpd7. [Accessed 8 November 2021].
  13. Fayvush, G., Vardanyan, Z., Aleksanyan, A. 2018. Invasiveness risk assessment of woody plants of Armenia. – Thaiszia Journal of Botany, 28(2), 081–091.
  14. Gaskin, J.F., Kazmer, D.J. 2009. Introgression between invasive saltcedars (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) in the USA. – Biological Invasions, 11, 1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9384-1.
  15. Genovesi, P., Shine, C. 2004. European strategy on invasive alien species. – Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention). Nature and Environment No. 137. Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing. 67 pp.
  16. Hope, A.C.A. 1968. A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. – Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 30(3), 582–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984263.
  17. Huntley, B., Birks, H.J.B. 1983. An Atlas of Past and Present Pollen Maps for Europe: 0–13000 Years Ago. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 667 pp.
  18. Janelis, I.M. 2010. Manor Gardens and Parks of Latvia. Rīga, Neputns. 304 pp.
  19. Laiviņš, M., Krampis, I., Šmite, D., Bice, M., Knape, D., Šulcs, V. 2009. Atlas of Latvian Woody Plants. (Latvijas Kokaugu Atlants). Rīga, Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas Institūts. 606 pp. (In Latvian with English summary).
  20. MacDonald, G.M. 1993. Fossil pollen analysis and the reconstruction of plant invasions. – Advances in Ecological Research, 24, 67–110.
  21. Mauriņš, A., Zvirgzds, A. 2006. Dendrology. (Dendroloģija). Jelgava, LU Akadēmiskais apgāds. 448 pp. (In Latvian).
  22. McDougall, K.L., Khuroo, A.A., Loope, L.L., Parks, C.G., Pauchard, A., Reshi, Z.A., Rushworth, I., Kueffer, C. 2011. Plant invasions in mountains: Global lessons for better management. – Mountain Research and Development, 31(4), 380–387.
  23. Nentwig, W., Bacher, S., Kumschick, S., Pyšek, P., Vilá, M. 2018. More than “100 worst” alien species in Europe. – Biological Invasions, 20, 1611–1621. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1651-6.
  24. Nutt, N., Kubjas, A. 2020. Suitability of the Weber-Gut risk assessment methodology used in Central Europe for determining invasive woody plant species in Estonian historical parks. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 72, 21–33.
  25. Petit, R.J., Bialozyt, R., Garnier-Géré, P., Hampe, A. 2004. Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: from recent introductions to Quaternary migrations. – Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 117–137.
  26. Pheloung, P.C. 1995. Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia. – A report to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management. Western Australia, Agriculture Protection Board, 36 pp.
  27. Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G.L., Williamson, M., Kirschner, J. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. – Taxon, 53(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135498.
  28. R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 12 November 2020].
  29. Reichard, S.H., White, P. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States: Most invasive plants have been introduced for horticultural use by nurseries, botanical gardens, and individuals. – BioScience, 51(2), 103–113.
  30. Rejmánek, M. 2014. Invasive trees and shrubs: where do they come from and what we should expect in the future? – Biological Invasions, 16(3), 483–498.
  31. Rejmánek, M., Haagerová, R., Haager, J. 1982. Progress of plant succession on Paricutin volcano: 25 years after activity ceased. – The American Midland Naturalist, 108, 194–198.
  32. Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M. 2013. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – 2013 update of the global database. – Diversity and Distributions, 19(8), 1093–1094.
  33. Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P. 2013. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. – van der Maarel, E., Franklin, J. (eds.). Vegetation Ecology. 2nd Edition, Chichester, UK, Wiley-Blackwell, 387–424.
  34. Sandvik, H., Sæther, B.-E., Holmern, T., Tufto, J., Engen, S., Roy, H.E. 2013. Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria. – Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(1), 37–62.
  35. Stace, C.A., Crawley, M.J. 2015. Alien Plants (New Naturalist 129). London, Harper Collins Publishers. 640 pp.
  36. Svilāns, A., Celmiņš, A., Āboliņa, A., Teļnovs, D., Vimba, E., Gavrilova, Ģ., Strāķe, S., Pilāts, V. 2007. List of alien species in Latvia. (Latvijas svešzemju sugu saraksts). [WWW document]. – URL http://biodiv.daba.gov.lv/cooperation/invaz/i-netam_invazivie.xls. [Accessed 12 November 2020]. (In Latvian).
  37. Van Wilgen, B., Richardson, D., Higgins, S.I. 2001. Integrated control of invasive alien plants in terrestrial ecosystems. – Land Use and Water Resources Research, 1(5), 1–6.
  38. Verbrugge, L.N.H., Leuven, R.S.E.W., Van der Velde, G. 2010. Evaluation of international risk assessment protocols for exotic species. – Final Report. Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Department of Environmental Sciences & Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology. 54 pp.
  39. Vilá, M., Basnou, C., Gollasch, S., Josefsson, M., Pergl, J., Scalera, R. 2008. One hundred of the most invasive alien species in Europe. – Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Dordrecht, Springer, 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_12.
  40. Vilá, M., Basnou, C., Pyšek, P., Josefsson, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Nentwig, W., Olenin, S., Roques, A., Roy, D., Hulme, P.E., DAISIE Partners. 2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan European, cross-taxa assessment. – Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1890/080083.
  41. Weber, E. 2003. Invasive Plant Species of the World: a Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds. Wallingford, CABI Publishing. 548 pp.
  42. Weber, E., Gut, D. 2004. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. – Journal for Nature Conservation, 12(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2004.04.002.
  43. Wei, T., Simko, V. 2017. R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84). [WWW document]. – URL https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot. [Accessed 29 November 2021].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 20
Submitted on: Jan 12, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 2, 2022
Published on: Feb 20, 2023
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Gunta Evarte-Bundere, Pēteris Evarts-Bunders, Anna Mežaka, Aiva Bojāre, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.