Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changes during twelve years in three mature hemiboreal stands growing in a radiation model intercomparison test site, Järvselja, Estonia Cover

Changes during twelve years in three mature hemiboreal stands growing in a radiation model intercomparison test site, Järvselja, Estonia

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Brede, B., Bartholomeus, H., Suomalainen, J., Clevers, J., Verbesselt, J., Herold, M., Culvenor, D., Gascon, F. 2016. The Speulderbos fiducial reference site for continuous monitoring of forest biophysical variables. – Proceedings of ‘Living Planet Symposium 2016’, Czech Republic, 9–13 May 2016. Prague, ESA SP–740.
  2. Copernicus HRL. 2019. HRL FOREST 2015 Final validation report. Document: GIO_HRL_FOR_Validation_Report_SC03, Issue: 1.7, 28/01/2019. [WWW document]. – URL https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/hrl-forest-2015-final-validation-report/view. [Accessed 06 June 2021].
  3. Dostálová, A., Wagner, W., Milenković, M., Hollaus, M. 2018. Annual seasonality in Sentinel-1 signal for forest mapping and forest type classification. – International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(21), 7738–7760. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1479788.
  4. Eisen, K., Barker Plotkin, A. 2015. Forty years of forest measurements support steadily increasing aboveground biomass in a maturing, Quercus-dominant northeastern forest. – The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 142(2), 97–112.
  5. Kantola, A., Mäkelä, A. 2006. Development of biomass proportions in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). – Trees, 20, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0018-2.
  6. Kuusk, A., Lang, M., Kuusk, J. 2013. Database of optical and structural data for the validation of forest radiative transfer models. – Kokhanovsky, A.A. (ed.). Light Scattering Reviews 7, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 109–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21907-8_4.
  7. Kuusk, A., Lang, M., Märdla, S., Pisek, J. 2015. Tree stems from terrestrial laser scanner measurements. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 63, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2015-0008.
  8. Kuusk, A., Pisek, J., Lang, M., Märdla, S. 2018. Estimation of gap fraction and foliage clumping in forest canopies. – Remote Sensing, 10(7), 1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071153.
  9. Lang, M., Kuusk, A., Mõttus, M., Rautiainen, M., Nilson, T. 2010. Canopy gap fraction estimation from digital hemispherical images using sky radiance models and a linear conversion method. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.001.
  10. Lang, M., Nilson, T., Kuusk, A., Pisek, J., Korhonen, L., Uri, V. 2017. Digital photography for tracking the phenology of an evergreen conifer stand. – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 246, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.021.
  11. Lang, M., Pisek, J. 2019. Tracking the long-term structure changes of a mature deciduous broadleaf forest stand using digital hemispherical photography. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 70, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2019-0007.
  12. Lõhmus, E. 2004. Forest site types in Estonia. (Eesti metsakasvukohatüübid). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 80 pp. (In Estonian).
  13. Maleki, K., Kiviste, A. 2015. Effect of sample plot size and shape on estimates of structural indices: A case study in mature silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) dominating stand in Järvselja. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 63, 130–150.
  14. Pisek, J., Rautiainen, M., Nikopensius, M., Raabe, K. 2015. Estimation of seasonal dynamics of understory NDVI in northern forests using MODIS BRDF data: Semi-empirical versus physically-based approach. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 163, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.003.
  15. Valentine, H.T., Mäkelä, A. 2005. Bridging process-based and empirical approaches to modeling tree growth. – Tree Physiology, 25(7), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.7.769.
  16. Widlowski, J.-L., Mio, C., Disney, M., Adams, J., Andredakis, I., Atzberger, C., Brennan, J., Busetto, L., Chelle, M., Ceccherini, G., Colombo, R., Côté, J.-F., Eenmäe, A., Essery, R., Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.-P., Gobron, N., Grau, E., Haverd, V., Homolová, L., Huang, H., Hunt, L., Kobayashi, H., Koetz, B., Kuusk, A., Kuusk, J., Lang, M., Lewis, P. E., Lovell, J.L., Malenovký, Z., Meroni, M., Morsdorf, F., Mõttus, M., Ni-Meister, W., Pinty, B., Rautiainen, M., Schlerf, M., Somers, B., Stuckens, J., Verstraete, M.M., Yang, W., Zhao, F., Zenone, T. 2015. The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 169, 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2021-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 122
Submitted on: Jun 14, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2021
Published on: Dec 1, 2021
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Mait Lang, Andres Kuusk, Mihkel Kaha, Jan Pisek, Jan-Peter George, Andres Kiviste, Diana Laarmann, Kristina Türk, Tauri Arumäe, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.