Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of magnesium sulphate biofortification in soilless production of microgreens Cover

Effect of magnesium sulphate biofortification in soilless production of microgreens

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Characteristics of the microgreens cultivation process depending on the species.

Common nameScientific nameDetermined TSW (g)Sowing rate per tray (g)Number of seeds per cm2Number of days in darknessNumber of days in the lightEntire cultivation period in days
CressL. sativum L.2.437.6257
MustardS. alba L.5.877.3336
BroccoliB. oleracea L. var. italica3.1713.73710
BasilO. basilicum L.1.5312.1336
SunflowerH. annuus L.60.9181.8459
CucumberC. sativus L.22.861.63811

1 TSW, thousand seed weight.

Table 2.

Parameters of the MgSO4 solution.

TreatmentMg concentration (mg · L−1)pH valueEC (μs · cm−1)
Mg1108.04700
Mg2207.831210
Mg3307.661670
Mg4407.471990
Mg5507.202500
Table 3.

Total amount of magnesium applied per tray (mg) calculated based on the cultivation duration, irrigation requirements of each species and MgSO4 treatment.

Cultivated speciesCultivation daysTreatment
Mg1Mg2Mg3Mg4Mg5
Cress71.012.033.044.055.07
Mustard60.741.482.222.953.69
Broccoli101.202.403.614.806.01
Basil60.501.001.502.002.50
Sunflower91.112.233.354.455.57
Cucumber111.973.935.907.869.82
Figure 1.

Water-soluble magnesium content in the studied species. Bars marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05): (A) cress; (B) mustard; (C) broccoli; (D) basil; (E) sunflower; (F) cucumber.

Table 4.

Percentage increase in magnesium content depending on the concentration of the biofortification solution and tested microgreen species.

TreatmentCress (%)Mustard (%)Broccoli (%)Basil (%)Sunflower (%)Cucumber (%)
C000000
Mg174.235.4026.7542.6143.6230.42
Mg269.0115.5749.29104.2144.3481.37
Mg3108.3633.5661.83161.2850.97118.62
Mg4145.8261.4981.14151.8535.97125.85
Mg5171.9666.78136.93262.1880.92185.59
Table 5.

Water-soluble calcium content in the studied species (mg · kg−1 FW).

TreatmentCressMustardBroccoliBasilSunflowerCucumber
C195.3 ± 0.6 ab166.8 ± 5.8 c122.8 ± 4.5 b149.1 ± 17.2 a118.2 ± 2.7 a210.5 ± 14.4 ab
Mg1218.3 ± 22.5 ab161.7 ± 5.2 c132.6 ± 5.1 b148.2 ± 9.6 a135.9 ± 16.7 a182.0 ± 6.6 b
Mg2177.3 ± 7.5 b160.4 ± 5.7 c132.4 ± 8.9 b158.2 ± 10.8 a116.3 ± 10.5 a225.9 ± 3.2 ab
Mg3233.0 ± 21.8 ab204.2 ± 4.1 b130.8 ± 4.0 b166.3 ± 21.6 a125.0 ± 2.7 a241.6 ± 12.8 a
Mg4282.9 ± 18.3 a218.1 ± 11.1 ab144.8 ± 5.5 ab129.4 ± 8.7 a105.1 ± 4.7 a232.9 ± 20.1 ab
Mg5286.6 ± 19.9 a237.6 ± 4.5 a165.7 ± 4.2 a166.7 ± 16.3 a122.0 ± 7.4 a252.8 ± 10.4 a

1 In the columns, different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05.

Figure 2.

Results of analysis of linear correlation between Ca and Mg content in microgreens of tested species: (A) cress; (B) mustard; (C) broccoli; (D) basil; (E) sunflower; (F) cucumber. Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals of the regression lines.

Table 6.

Dry matter content in the studied species (% FW).

TreatmentCressMustardBroccoliBasilSunflowerCucumber
C7.8 ± 0.2 a8.7 ± 0.4 b8.8 ± 0.3 a11.1 ± 1.2 a9.8 ± 0.3 a9.9 ± 0.5 a
Mg18.4 ± 0.7 a8.7 ± 0.4 b9.3 ± 0.3 a11.0 ± 0.7 a10.4 ± 1.2 a8.2 ± 0.1 a
Mg26.9 ± 0.2 a8.9 ± 0.2 b9.0 ± 0.4 a12.3 ± 0.6 a9.2 ± 0.8 a9.2 ± 0.1 a
Mg37.3 ± 0.5 a9.8 ± 0.1 ab9.1 ± 0.5 a12.7 ± 1.6 a9.9 ± 0.4 a9.0 ± 0.4 a
Mg48.2 ± 0.5 a10.8 ± 0.6 a9.6 ± 0.5 a10.7 ± 0.7 a8.0 ± 0.3 b8.9 ± 0.6 a
Mg58.8 ± 0.7 a10.5 ± 0.1 a9.8 ± 0.2 a13.7 ± 1.3 a10.4 ± 0.6 a9.7 ± 0.4 a

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups at p < 0.05.

Figure 3.

Total fresh yield (g · m−2) of microgreens at different magnesium concentrations: (A) cress; (B) mustard; (C) broccoli; (D) basil; (E) sunflower; (F) cucumber. Bars marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05.

Table 7.

Comparison of microgreen yields of the tested species.

SpeciesTotal yieldYield of edible parts
g · g−1 seed*Yield (g · m−2)g · g−1 seedYield (g · m−2)
Cress9.9 ± 0.3 b1805 ± 53 e9.9 ± 0.3 b**1805 ± 53 e**
Mustard6.0 ± 0.1 d2547 ± 49 d6.0 ± 0.1 d**2547 ± 49 d**
Broccoli7.7 ± 0.1 c3259 ± 46 c4.5 ± 0.1 b1925 ± 22 b
Basil7.3 ± 0.2 c1318 ± 27 f7.3 ± 0.2 c**1318 ± 27 f**
Sunflower4.5 ± 0.1 e4861 ± 77 a2.1 ± 0.1 c2302 ± 78 a
Cucumber11.3 ± 0.2 a4114 ± 73 b5.7 ± 0.1 a2070 ± 50 b

1* g · g−1 seed – fresh weight yield per gram of seed.

1** The entire plant was edible.

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the group at p < 0.05.

Figure 4.

Dependence of the content of analysed components in broccoli microgreens on the applied concentration of magnesium sulphate solution. Bars marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05): (A) vitamin C, (B) total phenols, (C) antioxidant activity, (D) flavonoids, (E) dry matter.

Table 8.

Comparison of analytical parameters within species regardless of treatment.

SpeciesVitamin C (mg · kg−1 FW)Antioxidant activity (DPPH) (mg · kg−1 FW)Flavonoids (mg · kg−1 FW)Total phenols (mg · kg−1 FW)Dry matter (% FW)
Cress167.7 ± 7.4 c886.9 ± 24.6 b305.2 ± 7.1 c1909.7 ± 68.5 b7.9 ± 0.2 c
Mustard312.2 ± 7.8 b906.8 ± 23.2 ab341.0 ± 9.9 c3445.5 ± 102.1 a9.6 ± 0.2 b
Broccoli*748.4 ± 6.5 a997.9 ± 8.2 a353.9 ± 5.4 c1707.9 ± 12.6 b9.2 ± 0.2 b
Basil43.3 ± 1.8 e563.4 ± 23.1 c528.9 ± 30.0 a1017.7 ± 40.9 c11.9 ± 0.5 a
Sunflower51.8 ± 2.1 e410.2 ± 35.6 d423.9 ± 22.4 b1004.4 ± 56.3 c9.6 ± 0.3 b
Cucumber74.7 ± 2.5 d150.4 ± 6.1 e145.7 ± 4.3 d661.8 ± 14.8 d9.1 ± 0.2 b

1* Mg5 treatment was excluded from the comparison because it exhibited higher values for most parameters than the other treatments.

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups at p < 0.05.

DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

Figure 5.

Relationship between magnesium content and selected parameters for broccoli microgreens: (A) relationship between magnesium content and flavonoid content; (B) relationship between magnesium content and vitamin C content. Values represent individual data points with the fitted regression line and 95% confidence intervals.

Table S1.

Magnesium content in the studied species (mg·kg−1 FW) as dependent on the applied MgSO4 treatments

TreatmentCressMustardBroccoliBasilSunflowerCucumber
C216.8 ± 22.4 c369.8 ± 14.6 d319.1 ± 6.9 e150.7 ± 17.5 c203.7 ± 5.5 b376.8 ± 19.8 d
Mg1377.8 ± 51.2 bc389.8 ± 21.7 d404.4 ± 10.6 de214.9 ± 19.6 bc292.5 ± 36.1 ab491.4 ± 6.9 cd
Mg2366.5 ± 7.0 bc427.4 ± 15.6 cd476.5 ± 24.5 cd307.8 ± 16.8 bc294.0 ± 25.9 ab683.4 ± 18.5 bc
Mg3451.8 ± 38.9 ab493.9 ± 15.1 bc516.5 ± 25.9 bc393.8 ± 65.8 ab307.5 ± 7.3 a823.7 ± 55.8 b
Mg4533.1 ± 39.3 ab556.3 ± 32.2 ab581.0 ± 19.5 b379.6 ± 17.3 ab276.9 ± 10.8 ab850.9 ± 122.9 ab
Mg5589.7 ± 66.2 a616.8 ± 13.4 a756.05 ± 14.4 a545.8 ± 57.0 a368.5 ± 18.1 a1076.1 ± 30.1 a

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups at p < 0.05.

Table S2.

Selected bioactive parameters of microgreen species under different Mg treatments

TreatmentVitamin C (mg · kg−1 FW)Antioxidant activity (DPPH) (mg · kg−1 FW)Flavonoids (mg · kg−1 FW)Total phenols (mg · kg−1 FW)
Cress
C197.3 ± 33.8 a845.3 ± 62.9 a289.9 ± 2.1 a1624.0 ± 57.2 a
Mg1193.6 ± 19.3 a886.2 ± 81.7 a313.2 ± 21.6 a1829.3 ± 260.8 a
Mg2160.0 ± 6.1 a856.8 ± 47.2 a278.9 ± 8.7 a1885.1 ± 82.4 a
Mg3169.4 ± 13.4 a843.8 ± 38.2 a303.6 ± 8.8 a1893.4 ± 97.0 a
Mg4159.7 ± 16.1 a952.9 ± 83.9 a329.6 ± 25.1 a2128.2 ± 230.6 a
Mg5136.0 ± 5.8 a922.5 ± 62.2 a310.7 ± 16.1 a2003.0 ± 123.7 a
Mustard
C297.4 ± 5.0 a889.5 ± 77.3 a394.3 ± 14.0 a3431.8 ± 224.7 a
Mg1285.8 ± 16.7 a885.8 ± 84.3 a355.9 ± 28.9 a3919.3 ± 148.4 a
Mg2304.6 ± 23.5 a827.4 ± 45.9 a309.6 ± 6.6 a2974.2 ± 362.4 a
Mg3321.6 ± 5.9 a936.7 ± 71.4 a308.3 ± 19.3 a3275.4 ± 167.7 a
Mg4309.7 ± 9.9 a962.5 ± 28.9 a318.1 ± 8.2 a3499.8 ± 100.7 a
Mg5345.1 ± 31.3 a938.6 ± 18.2 a356.8 ± 24.3 a3730.3 ± 47.1 a
Broccoli
C751.3 ± 31.9 b1008.5 ± 19.5 b360.4 ± 23.2 b1699.9 ± 2.5 b
Mg1747.3 ± 10.8 b991.8 ± 21.9 b345.5 ± 3.9 b1673.9 ± 7.0 b
Mg2741.3 ± 13.8 b1010.5 ± 21.5 b352.9 ± 3.6 b1694.0 ± 42.2 b
Mg3744.8 ± 3.8 b993.2 ± 22.1 b361.8 ± 6.9 b1752.4 ± 24.6 b
Mg4757.5 ± 6.4 b985.7 ± 17.1 b349.3 ± 17.0 b1717.2 ± 26.7 b
Mg5882.5 ± 13.3 a1123.3 ± 23.5 a478.5 ± 13.5 a1884.0 ± 16.5 a
Basil
C44.8 ± 2.7 a551.2 ± 86.4 a474.8 ± 107.9 ab1041.9 ± 120.0 a
Mg143.1 ± 5.8 a618.4 ± 26.7 a575.1 ± 50.3 ab1114.6 ± 30.7 a
Mg237.2 ± 5.2 a478.0 ± 5.7 a457.7 ± 15.3 ab1016.5 ± 121.4 a
Mg339.1 ± 1.3 a669.7 ± 12.2 a662.4 ± 10.7 a1135.6 ± 7.3 a
Mg444.4 ± 3.2 a524.2 ± 38.4 a535.1 ± 21.8 ab942.2 ± 114.4 a
Mg551.3 ± 4.2 a478.0 ± 53.5 a378.3 ± 31.1 b785.9 ± 45.6 a
Sunflower
C56.3 ± 5.8 a430.3 ± 9.7 ab481.5 ± 24.1 a1251.10 ± 129.2 a
Mg147.2 ± 5.7 a375.5 ± 819.5 ab415.4 ± 50.5 a872.8 ± 70.0 a
Mg241.6 ± 2.3 a328.8 ± 54.0 b402.6 ± 45.3 a849.3 ± 77.9 a
Mg350.5 ± 2.1 a349.1 ± 26.5 ab382.4 ± 46.9 a906.0 ± 61.3 a
Mg451.6 ± 4.5 a471.1 ± 132.0 ab390.6 ± 74.1 a1092.3 ± 191.0 a
Mg561.9 ± 6.4 a564.5 ± 146.5 a478.9 ± 84.3 a1054.7 ± 180.7 a
Cucumber
C78.8 ± 5.4 a161.1 ± 14.6 ab135.7 ± 8.8 a703.5 ± 56.1 ab
Mg166.1 ± 1.6 a154.5 ± 7.7 ab144.3 ± 11.5 a650.5 ± 14.6 ab
Mg273.5 ± 6.6 a180.9 ± 8.4 a145.4 ± 6.7 a694.5 ± 26.9 ab
Mg370.5 ± 5.4 a127.1 ± 9.9 b137.5 ± 11.7 a657.0 ± 34.3 ab
Mg481.2 ± 7.1 a144.9 ± 4.9 ab152.2 ± 12.3 a612.9 ± 28.3 bc
Mg583.7 ± 10.7 a123.2 ± 0.9 b169.3 ± 9.9 a620.6 ± 17.1 bc

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups at p < 0.05.

DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

Table S3.

Yield of tested microgreen species as dependent on the applied MgSO4 treatments (g · m−2)

TreatmentCressMustardBroccoliBasilSunflowerCucumber
C1932 ± 5 a2400 ± 202 a3183 ± 86 a1265 ± 54 a5041 ± 84 a3975 ± 259 a
Mg11949 ± 111 a2561 ± 131 a3275 ± 85 a1395 ± 46 a5021 ± 168 a4285 ± 213 a
Mg21775 ± 104 a2624 ± 89 a3446 ± 141 a1324 ± 112 a5224 ± 203 a4017 ± 254 a
Mg31691 ± 82 a2535 ± 46 a3399 ± 99 a1369 ± 43 a4674 ± 113 a4241 ± 104 a
Mg41714 ± 254 a2581 ± 148 a3180 ± 123 a1317 ± 58 a4657 ± 141 a3987 ± 45 a
Mg51858 ± 57 a2515 ± 140 a3069 ± 70 a1237 ± 58 a4610 ± 82 a4078 ± 69 a

1 Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups at p < 0.05.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 89
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2025
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2026 Adam Fuchsbauer, Aleš Jezdinský, Robert Pokluda, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.