Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of different mulch materials with varying thicknesses on weed control and yield in eggplant cultivation Cover

The effect of different mulch materials with varying thicknesses on weed control and yield in eggplant cultivation

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Meteorological data for Iğdır province between 2021 and 2022 and LTA (1941–2020).

MonthsAverage temperature (°C)Total precipitation (mm)Average relative humidity (%)
20212022LTA20212022LTA20212022LTA
March10.010.46.217.518.122.160.565.652.2
April17.411.513.018.483.633.843.676.649.9
May21.118.817.742.176.146.546.363.151.5
June26.824.222.10.715.732.033.948.347.3
July27.426.725.932.430.213.745.748.445.3
August27.424.225.38.315.39.740.647.647.1
September22.223.520.411.51.411.544.847.746.2
October12.714.513.118.57.326.360.049.648.5

1 Meteorological Service of Türkiye; LTA, long-term average (MS, 2024).

Table 2.

General properties and application rates of mulch materials used in the study.

CodeMaterial usedGeneral characteristicsApplication quantities
CP-5CP 5 cmPaper pieces cut vertically into 1 cm pieces1000 kg · da−1
CP-10CP 10 cm2000 kg · da−1
CP-15CP 15 cm3000 kg · da−1
CTG-5 cmCTG 5 cmMixed CTG: L. perenne 25%, F. arundinacea 45%, P. pratensis 10%, F. rubra subsp. rubra 20%1750 kg · da−1
CTG-10 cmCTG 10 cm3500 kg · da−1
CTG-15 cmCTG 15 cm5250 kg · da−1
WS-5WS 5 cmWS (‘Demir 2000’ variety)1500 kg · da−1
WS-10WS 10 cm3000 kg · da−1
WS-15WS 15 cm4500 kg · da−1

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

Table 3.

Density scale of weeds.

ClassificationDensity levelDensity (plants · m−2)
AHigh density>10
BDense1–10
CMedium density0.1–1
DLow density0.01–0.1
ERare<0.01
Table 4.

Weed families, scientific names, common names and life cycles of the identified weed species in the experimental area.

FamilyScientific nameCommon nameLife cycleDensity (plants · m−2) – Density scale
20212022Mean
Narrow-leaved
PoaceaeSorghum halepense (L.) Pers.Johnson grassP14.5 A10.6 A12.6 A
Seteria verticillata (L.) P.B.Bristly foxtailA0.8 C0.6 C0.7 C
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.Bermuda grassP0.5 C0.1 C0.3 C
Broad-leaved
Amaranthus retroflexus L.Redroot pigweedA-0.2 C0.1 C
AmaranthaceaeChenopodium album L.Common lambsquartersA5.5 B6.0 B5.8 B
Atriplex nitens Schkuhr.Mountain spinachP0.6 C0.6 C0.6 C
Suaeda altissima (L.) PALLSea blightA0.2 C0.3 C0.3 C
AsteraceaeCirsium arvense (L.) Scop.Canada thistleP0.9 C0.8 C0.8 C
Xanthium strumarium L.Common cockleburA4.8 B5.0 B4.9 B
BrassicaceaeSinapis arvensis L.mustardA0.3 C-0.2 C
Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb. Ex Prant.FlixweedA0.2 C-0.1 C
Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.Hoary cressP0.4 C0.5 C0.5 C
Myagrum perfoliatum L.Field mustardA0.8 C0.4 C0.6 C
ConvolvulaceaeConvolvulus arvensis L.Field bindweedP4.3 B3.8 B4.0 B
FabaceaeAlhagi pseudalhagi (BIEB.) DESV.CamelthornP0.5 C-0.3 C
PortulacaceaePortulaca oleracea L.PurslaneA0.5 C0.6 C0.6 C
Polygonum aviculare L.Prostrate knotweedA0.3 C0.3 C0.3 C
Parasitic
CuscutaceaeCuscuta spp.DodderParasitic0.3 C0.1 C0.2 C

1 Life cycle: A – annual; P – perennial.

1 Density scale: A – high density, ≥10.00 plants · m−2; B – intensive, 1.00–10.00 plants · m−2; C – medium, 0.10–1.00 plants · m−2.

Figure 1.

Effect of mulching on weed population (CP, CTG and WS). Lowercase letters indicate groupings among the treatments, while uppercase letters indicate groupings among evaluations within each treatment. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level. CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

Table 5.

Effect of mulching on S. halepense.

SORG2021 year2022 yearMean
TRE1.E2.E3. EFp1.E2.E3. EFp1.E2.E3.EFp
Weed free0.00 f0.00 g0.00 h--0.00 d0.00 g0.00 h--0.00 e0.00 g0.00 g--
CTG-150.00 f0.00 g0.00 h--0.13 dB1.00 gAB1.75 hA7.180.026*0.06 eB0.50 gAB0.88 gA7.180.026*
CP-158.00 cdB9.00 deB11.00 efA7.000.027*4.75 cC7.50 efB9.25 efA25.550.001**6.38 cdC8.25 deB10.13 deA38.200.000**
CTG-55.00 eC10.00 cdeB14.00 cdeA25.240.001**4.50 cC11.00 cdB14.25 cdA46.090.000**4.75 dC10.50 cdB14.13 cA39.600.000**
WS-106.00 deC8.00 eB12.00 defA42.000.000**3.63 cC8.00 deB10.54 eA25.060.001**4.81 dC8.00 deB11.27 dA56.480.000**
CP-109.00 bcB12.00 cAB15.00 cdA11.170.009**8.00 bC11.75cB13.83 dA28.380.001**8.50 bcC11.88 cB14.42 cA17.000.003**
WS-58.00 cdB11.00 cdB16.00 cA14.450.005**5.63 cC12.00 bcB16.00 cA30.780.001**6.81 cdC11.50 cB16.00 cA23.500.001**
CTG-106.00 deB8.00 eAB9.00 fgA3.500.0983.50 cB7.00 efA7.79 fA35.620.000**4.75 dB7.50 eA8.40 eA46.110.000**
WS-152.00 fB5.00 fA6.00 gA14.180.005**1.13 dB4.46 fA5.00 gA31.180.001**1.56 eB4.73 fA5.50 fA30.460.001**
CP-511.00 bC17.00 bB21.00 bA39.810.000**9.50 bC15.00 bB18.50 bA28.500.001**10.25 bC16.00 bB19.75 bA38.110.000**
Weedy20.00 aC32.00 aB53.00 aA58.390.000**16.00 aC30.00 aB46.50 aA61.240.000**18.00 aC31.00 aB49.75 aA83.190.000**
Mean7.5411.1815.095.169.7913.046.3510.4914.06
F38.93135.12167.4838.1263.00422.0048.03108.20391.92
P0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1* p < 0.05;

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; E, assessment; TRE, treatments; WS, wheat straw.

1 Lowercase letters indicate groupings among the applications, while uppercase letters indicate groupings among evaluations within each application. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 6.

Effect of mulching on C. arvensis.

CON.2021 year2022 yearMean
TRE1.E2.E3.EFp1.E2.E3.EFp1.E2.E3.EFp
Weed free0.00 d0.00 e0.00 d--0.00 f0.00 e0.00 f--0.00 f0.00 f0.00 f--
CTG-150.00dC1.00 deB3.00 cA42.000.000**0.00 fC0.50 efC1.63 efA30.690.001**0.00 fC0.75 efB2.31 deA37.720.000**
CP-150.00 dB3.00 cdA3.00 cA21.600.002**0.00 fB2.29 cdA2.75 cdeA31.000.001**0.00 fB2.65 cA2.88 cdeA29.360.001**
CTG-52.00 bcA3.00 cdA3.00 cA2.280.1831.0 deB2.00 cdAB3.00 cdeA6.850.028*1.50 eB2.50 cAB3.00 cdeA4.800.057
WS-103.00 bB5.00 bcA5.00 bcA8.000.020*1.50 cdB3.50 bcA3.75 bcdA15.640.004**2.25 cdB4.25 bcA4.38 bcdeA13.210.006**
CP-103.00 bA5.00 bcA6.00 bcA3.8180.0852.00 cB3.33 bcAB4.00 bcdA3.890.0822.50 bcB4.17 bcAB5.00 bcdA3.940.080
WS-52.00 bcB5.00 bcA6.00 bcA18.900.003**1.50 cdC3.50 bcB4.50 bcA28.000.001**1.75 deB4.25 bcA5.25 bcA23.110.002**
CTG-100.00 dC2.00 deB4.00 cA33.880.001**0.00 fC1.50 deB2.63 deA39.960.000**0.00 fC1.75 deB3.31 cdeA40.290.000**
WS-151.00 cdC2.00 deB3.00 cA16.000.004**0.50 efB1.50 deAB2.25 deA6.520.031*0.75 fB1.75 deA2.63 deA10.560.011*
CP-53.00 bB6.00 bA7.00 bA8.660.017*3.00 bB4.33 bAB5.50 bA8.550.017*3.00 bB5.17 bA6.25 bA8.740.017*
Weedy6.00 aA9.00 aA11.00 aA2.090.2054.00 aA7.00 aA7.50 aA2.860.1345.00 aA8.00 aA9.25 aA2.540.158
Mean2.094.095.001.232.683.411.663.384.20
F27.27015.19310.1520.87017.56212.72545.58016.98611.173
P0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1* p < 0.05;

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; E, assessment; TRE, treatments; WS, wheat straw.

1 Lowercase letters indicate groupings among the applications, while uppercase letters indicate groupings among evaluations within each application. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 7.

Effect of mulching on X. strumarium.

XAN2021 year2022 yearMean
TRE1.E2.E3. EFp1.E2.E3. EFp1.E2.E3. EFp
Weed free0.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 b--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--
CTG-150.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 b--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--
CP-150.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 b--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--
CTG-50.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 bA0.00 bA0.13 bA3.0000.1250.00 bA0.00 bA0.06 cA3.0000.125
WS-100.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 bA0.00 bA0.04 bA1.0000.4220.00 bA0.00 bA0.02 cA1.0000.422
CP-100.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 bA0.25 bA0.46 bA3.6400.0920.00 bA0.13 bA0.23 cA3.6400.092
WS-50.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 bA0.25 bA0.25 bA3.0000.1250.00 bA0.13 bA0.13 cA3.0000.125
CTG-100.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 bA0.00 bA0.13 bA3.0000.1250.00 bA0.00 bA0.06 cA3.0000.125
WS-150.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 b--0.00 b0.00 b0.00 c--
CP-50.00 bB1.00 bA1.00 bA24.0000.001**0.00 bA0.75 bA1.00 bA4.8750.0550.00 bA0.88 bA1.00 bA9.5000.014*
Weedy3.00 aB6.00 aA8.00 aA11.4000.009**2.50 aA4.00 aA5.00 aA1.5830.2802.75 aB5.00 aAB6.50 aA5.3440.046*
Mean0.360.810.900.230.480.640.290.640.77
F27.0026.4373043.218.7510.8516.3222.6817.77104.69
P0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1* p < 0.05;

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; E, assessment; TRE, treatments; WS, wheat straw.

1 Lowercase letters indicate groupings among the applications, while uppercase letters indicate groupings among evaluations within each application. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 8.

Effect of mulching on other weed species.

Other2021 year2022 yearMean
TRE1.E2.E3.EFp1.E2.E3.EFp1.E2.E3.EFp
Weed free0.00 e0.00 d0.00 c--0.00 d0.00 d0.00 e--0.00 e0.00 d0.00c--
CTG-150.00 eA0.00 dA0.08 cA1.000.4220.00 d0.00 d0.00 e0.00 e0.00 d0.04 c1.000.422
CP-150.00 eB0.17 cdB0.67 bcA10.400.011*0.00 dB0.00 dB0.50 bcdA12.000.008**0.00 e0.08 d0.58 c15.630.004**
CTG-51.00 bA1.67 bA1.75 bA1.490.2981.00 bA1.50 bA1.50 bcA1.000.4221.00 b1.58 b1.63 b1.340.329
WS-100.08 deB0.92 bcA1.00 bcA55.500.000**0.25 cdB1.00 bcA1.25 bcdA13.000.007**0.17 de0.96 bc1.13 bc26.640.001**
CP-100.08 deA0.33 cdA0.67 bcA2.460.1650.00 B0.25 cdAB0.50 bcdA4.500.0640.04 e0.29 cd0.58 bc3.250.110
WS-50.83 bcB1.50 bA1.92 bA16.120.004*0.75 bcB1.50 bA1.75 bA13.000.007**0.79 bc1.50 b1.83 b16.860.003**
CTG-100.33 cdeA0.33 cdA0.58 bA0.500.6300.25 cdA0.25 cdA0.50 bcdA1.000.4220.29 cde0.29 cd0.54 bc0.700.531
WS-150.00 A0.17 cdA0.17 cA2.000.2160.00 dA0.25 cdA0.25 deA1.500.2960.00 e0.21 cd0.21 c1.780.246
CP-50.58 bcdB1.42 bA1.83 bA9.720.013*0.75 bcB1.25 bAB1.50 bcA3.500.0980.67 bcd1.33 b1.67 b7.460.024*
Weedy2.67 aB7.00 aA9.33 aA13.430.006**2.00 aB6.50 aA8.00 aA12.100.008**2.33 a6.75 a8.67 a13.130.006**
Mean0.501.201.600.451.141.430.481.181.53
F22.65868.38931.9628.75040.51334.78515.34155.03734.075
P0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1* p < 0.05;

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; E, assessment; TRE, treatments; WS, wheat straw.

1 Lowercase letters indicate groupings among the applications, while uppercase letters indicate groupings among evaluations within each application. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 9.

Effect of mulching on weed dry weight.

Treatments20222023Means
Weed dry weights (g)Effect (%)Weed dry weights (g)Effect (%)Weed dry weights (g)Effect (%)
CTG-5 cm210.13 ± 14.72 b17.11206.38 ± 23.41 b49.34208.26 ± 15.86 b36.97
CTG-10 cm160.70 ± 17.79 d36.61165.70 ± 14.72 c59.32163.20 ± 9.35 c50.61
CTG-15 cm115.20 ± 21.60 f54.5699.80 ± 4.09 de75.50107.50 ± 12.62 d67.47
CP-5143.30 ± 7.25 e43.47186.80 ± 14.39 bc54.14165.05 ± 7.13 c50.05
CP-1066.50 ± 14.71 g73.7777.75 ± 14.93 ef80.9172.13 ± 14.77 e78.17
CP-1542.00 ± 14.14 h83.4348.25 ± 17.97 g88.1645.13 ± 15.99 f86.34
WS-5182.19 ± 12.63 c28.13203.43 ± 16.82 b50.06192.81 ± 7.83 b41.65
WS-10122.00 ± 10.80 f51.87114.78 ± 10.64 d71.82118.39 ± 5.98 d64.17
WS-1560.00 ± 21.20 gh76.3360.00 ± 19.58 fg85.2760.00 ± 19.57 de81.84
Weed253.50 ± 4.72 a0.00407.37 ± 34.27 a0.00330.44 ± 15.70 a0.00
Weed-free0.00 ± 0.00 ı100.000.00 ± 0.00 h100.000.00 ± 0.00 f100.00
Mean123.23 ± 75.04142.75 ± 108.20132.99 ± 89.84
F116.782155.467214.863
p-value0.000**0.000**0.000**

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

1 Lowercase letters indicate groups formed among the applications, while uppercase letters denote groups formed within evaluations for each application. Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 10.

Effects of mulching on eggplant yield and yield components.

TreatmentsPlant height (cm)Fruits per plant (fruit · plant−1)Fruit weight (g)Yield per plant (kg)Yield (t · ha−1)
2021
CTG-5 cm50.60 ± 1.41 h17.85 ± 0.08 e140.03 ± 1.63 e2.50 ± 0.16 d65.25 ± 1.54 d
CTG-10 cm72.14 ± 1.41 c19.59 ± 0.04 b155.11 ± 1.65 b3.04 ± 0.16 abc78.99 ± 1.51 b
CTG-15 cm75.20 ± 2.16 b19.74 ± 0.08 a162.05 ± 1.42 a3.20 ± 0.22 a83.20 ± 0.81 a
CP-549.45 ± 0.71 h17.33 ± 0.06 f132.13 ± 2.18 f2.29 ± 0.08 d59.54 ± 0.40 g
CP-1064.70 ± 2.94 e19.43 ± 0.06 c144.08 ± 0.83 d2.80 ± 0.16 c72.55 ± 0.64 d
CP-1576.80 ± 0.82 ab19.45 ± 0.04 c154.17 ± 1.46 b3.00 ± 0.14 abc78.00 ± 1.06 b
WS-554.70 ± 1.6 3 g17.02 ± 0.07 g138.07 ± 2.16 e2.35 ± 0.12 d61.10 ± 0.70 f
WS-1078.30 ± 0.00 a19.67 ± 0.08 ab160.06 ± 1.48 a3.15 ± 0.28 ab81.90 ± 0.70 a
WS-1562.30 ± 1.41 f19.32 ± 0.07 c150.04 ± 2.12 c2.90 ± 0.16 bc75.40 ± 0.32 c
Weed43.12 ± 2.16 ı15.87 ± 0.09 h126.02 ± 1.63 g2.01 ± 0.16 e52.26 ± 0.81 h
Weed-free68.40 ± 1.41 d19.24 ± 0.05 d148.10 ± 1.43 c2.85 ± 0.12 c74.10 ± 0.70 c
Mean63.25 ± 11.8618.59 ± 1.29146.35 ± 11.172.74 ± 0.4171.11 ± 0.97
F219.791159.572186.85821.177483.703
p-value0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**
2022
CTG-5 cm52.68 ± 5.19 f15.45 ± 0.62 c150.00 ± 4.16 bcd2.32 ± 0.08 de60.23 ± 2.23 de
CTG-10 cm70.09 ± 3.10 abc19.35 ± 0.65 a155.00 ± 3.55 abc3.00 ± 0.14 a78.00 ± 3.82 a
CTG-15 cm71.68 ± 6.22 bc18.60 ± 0.75 ab162.50 ± 6.45 a3.02 ± 0.10 a78.52 ± 2.62 a
CP-551.55 ± 5.04 f15.10 ± 0.61 c140.75 ± 5.61 e2.12 ± 0.05 e55.20 ± 1.35 e
CP-1063.90 ± 2.79 de17.88 ± 0.29 b147.25 ± 5.12 cde2.63 ± 0.12 b68.45 ± 3.27 b
CP-1580.05 ± 5.13 a19.60 ± 1.03 a151.25 ± 6.89 bcd2.97 ± 0.24 a77.12 ± 6.25 a
WS-551.73 ± 3.93 f15.55 ± 0.81 c140.25 ± 5.56 e2.18 ± 0.09 de56.65 ± 2.55 de
WS-1075.33 ± 5.39 ab17.55 ± 1.72 b145.50 ± 4.50 de2.56 ± 0.29 bc66.45 ± 7.57 bc
WS-1560.73 ± 3.26 e18.88 ± 1.07 ab158.25 ± 2.36 ab2.99 ± 0.13 a77.62 ± 3.62 a
Weed41.22 ± 3.69 g12.50 ± 0.60 d123.75 ± 8.53 f1.54 ± 0.06 f40.13 ± 1.60 f
Weed-free66.25 ± 2.21 cde16.20 ± 0.81 c145.75 ± 3.30 de2.36 ± 0.13 cd61.39 ± 3.54 cd
Mean62.29 ± 12.1016.97 ± 2.26147.30 ± 11.092.52 ± 0.4765.43 ± 1.22
F29.87224.30715.03838.45538.455
p-value0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**
Mean
CTG-5 cm51.64 ± 2.86 f16.70 ± 0.96 cd145.02 ± 3.78 cd2.41 ± 0.07 e62.74 ± 1.28 d
CTG-10 cm71.11 ± 1.92 c19.48 ± 0.85 a155.06 ± 5.30 ab3.02 ± 0.14 ab78.49 ± 2.45 ab
CTG-15 cm73.44 ± 3.59 bc19.17 ± 0.49 a162.28 ± 7.21 a3.11 ± 0.14 a80.86 ± 1.61 a
CP-550.50 ± 2.59 f16.26 ± 1.03 d136.44 ± 6.42 e2.21 ± 0.04 e57.37 ± 0.70 e
CP-1064.30 ± 2.83 de18.63 ± 1.07 ab145.67 ± 6.18 cd2.72 ± 0.11 cd70.50 ± 1.95 d
CP-1578.43 ± 2.80 a19.54 ± 0.48 a152.71 ± 7.31 bc2.98 ± 0.15 ab77.56 ± 3.26 b
WS-553.21 ± 1.55 f16.30 ± 1.00 d139.16 ± 4.49 de2.26 ± 0.11 e58.87 ± 1.58 e
WS-1076.81 ± 2.69 ab18.61 ± 1.35 ab152.78 ± 4.29 bc2.85 ± 0.26 bc74.17 ± 4.04 c
WS-1561.51 ± 2.22 e19.10 ± 0.48 a154.15 ± 3.83 b2.94 ± 0.09 ab76.51 ± 1.74 bc
Weed42.17 ± 2.62 g14.23 ± 0.84 e124.89 ± 3.30 f1.78 ± 0.11 f46.19 ± 0.44 f
Weed-free67.33 ± 0.62 d17.72 ± 0.37 bc146.93 ± 2.09 bcd2.61 ± 0.07 d67.74 ± 1.54 d
Mean62.77 ± 11.7817.79 ± 1.81146.82 ± 11.012.63 ± 0.4268.27 ± 1.06
F91.24515.58216.08038.814104.424
p-value0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

1 Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 11.

Effects of mulching on eggplant fruit quality and marketable yield.

TreatmentsFruit length (cm)Fruit diameter (cm)Fruit firmness (kg · cm−2)Marketable yield (t · ha−1)Unmarketable yield (t · ha−1)
CTG-5 cm17 ± 0.18 f6 ± 0.09 e4.0 ± 0.01 b51.20 ± 0.90 g9.03 ± 0.11 b
CTG-10 cm18 ± 0.09 e7 ± 0.04 d4.0 ± 0.02 b70.30 ± 1.40 c7.70 ± 0.01 e
CTG-15 cm22 ± 0.07 a10 ± 0.06 a4.5 ± 0.04 a71.01 ± 1.01 b7.51 ± 0.04 f
CP-5 cm16 ± 0.06 g6 ± 0.06 e3.5 ± 0.04 c45.92 ± 2.04 ı9.28 ± 0.03 b
CP-10 cm18 ± 0.10 e6 ± 0.03 e4.0 ± 0.03 b60.45 ± 1.50 d8.01 ± 0.01 d
CP-15 cm20 ± 0.09 c8 ± 0.04 c4.5 ± 0.05 a70.26 ± 0.81 c6.87 ± 0.05 j
WS-5 cm16 ± 0.09 g7 ± 0.06 d3.0 ± 0.06 d47.85 ± 0.75 h8.81 ± 0.01 c
WS-10 cm19 ± 0.80 d8 ± 0.04 c3.5 ± 0.02 c59.39 ± 1.20 e7.07 ± 0.02 h
WS-15 cm21 ± 0.09 b9 ± 0.03 b4.5 ± 0.04 a71.62 ± 0.90 a6.00 ± 0.01 ı
Weedy12 ± 0.06 h4 ± 0.07 f2.0 ± 0.03 e29.39 ± 2.40 j10.75 ± 0.07 a
Weed-free18 ± 0.05 e6 ± 0.05 e4.0 ± 0.03 b54.09 ± 0.50 f7.31 ± 0.03 g
Mean17.93 ± 0.406.99 ± 0.243.77 ± 0.1157.39 ± 1.948.06 ± 0.20
F788.373993.649340.909749.5411051.650
p-value0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**0.000**

1** p < 0.01.

1 CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

1 Differences between means indicated by the same letter are not significant at the 0.05 level. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Figure 2.

Correlations of weed density and dry weight with other parameters. WD, weed density; WDW, weed dry weights; PH, plant height; NFPP, number of fruits per; FW, fruit weight; YPP, yield per plant; Y, yield.

Figure 3.

Heat map of the parameters corresponding to the applications (CP, CTG and WS). CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

Figure 4.

Applications (A) hierarchical clustering and (B) network graph analysis. CP, shredded paper; CTG, grass clippings; WS, wheat straw.

Figure 5.

Principal component analysis of parameters and applications.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 111
Submitted on: Jan 6, 2025
Accepted on: May 19, 2025
Published on: Jul 15, 2025
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2025 Ramazan Gurbuz, Serkan Cağlar, Harun Alptekın, Volkan Okatan, İbrahim Kahramanoğlu, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.