Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services in the Warsaw metropolitan area
References
- Baumeister, C.F., Gerstenberg, T., Plieninger, T., Schraml, U. 2020. Exploring cultural ecosystem service hotspots: Linking multiple urban forest features with public participation mapping data. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 48, 126561. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126561.
- Baumeister, C.F., Gerstenberg, T., Plieninger, T., Schraml, U. 2022. Geography of disservices in urban forests: Public participation mapping for closing the loop. Ecosystems and People, 18 (1), 44–63. DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2021.2021289.
- Brown, G., Fagerholm, N. 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS Mapping of Ecosystem Services: A Review and Evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
- Brodrechtova, Y. 2024. Assessing actor power in the tradeoffs between ecosystem services affecting forest management - A case study from Central Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 163, 103187. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103187.
- Brown, G. 2017. A Review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Transactions in GIS, 21(1), 39–56. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12207.
- Bruzzese, S., Blanc, S., Merlino, V.M., Massaglia, S., Brun F. 2022. Civil society’s perception of forest ecosystem services. A case study in the Western Alps. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1000043. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000043.
- Ciesielski, M., Mohytych, V., Korcz, N. 2024. The role and significance of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) based on a survey of forest users in the Warsaw metropolitan area. Sylwan, 168 (8), 533–548. DOI: 10.26202/sylwan.2024027.
- Costanza, R. et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. DOI: 10.1038/387253a0.
- Derks, J., Giessen, L., Winkel, G. 2020. COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102253. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253.
- Gerstenberg, T., Baumeister, C., Schraml, U., Plieninger, T. 2020. Hot routes in urban forests: The impact of multiple landscape features on recreational use intensity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103888. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103888.
- Gołos, P. 2013a. Selected aspects of the forest recreational function in view of its users. Forest Research Paper, 74 (3), 257–272.
- Gołos, P. 2013b. The recreational functions of Warsaw’s urban and suburban forests. Forest Research Papers, 74 (1), 57–70. DOI: 10.2478/frp-2013-0007
- Gołos, P. 2018. Social and economic aspects of the nonproduction functions of forests and forest management - results of public opinion research (in Polish). Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa, 22. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Sękocin Stary.
- Grzyb, T., Kulczyk, S., Derek, M., Woźniak, E. 2021. Using social media to assess recreation across urban green spaces in times of abrupt change. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101297.
- GUS. 2024a. Area and population in the territorial profile in 2024 (in Polish). Available at https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/ludnosc/powierzchnia-i-ludnosc-w-przekroju-terytorialnym-w-2024-roku,7,21.html (access on 31 December 2025).
- GUS. 2024b. Forestry. Statistical Yearbook 2024 (in Polish). Available at https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-lesnictwa-2024,13,7.html (access on 31 December 2025).
- Hegetschweiler, K.T., Wartmann, F., Dubernet, I., Fisher, C., Hunziker, M. 2022. Urban forest usage and perception of ecosystem services - A comparison between teenagers and adults. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 74, 127624. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127624.
- Heikinheimo, V., Tenkanen, H., Bergroth, C., Järv, O., Hiippala, T., Toivonen, T. 2020. Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103845. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103845.
- Hochmalová, M. et al. 2022. Demand for forest ecosystem services: a comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China. European Journal of Forest Research, 141, 867–886. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-022-01478-0.
- Instruction. 2024. Forest Management Instruction (in Polish). Available at: https://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/publikacje/copy_of_gospodarka-lesna/urzadzanie/iul/instrukcja-urzadzenia-lasu-2024/instrukcja-urzadzania-lasu-czesc-i.pdf/view (access on 31 December 2025).
- Janeczko, E. et al. 2023. Sociocultural profile as a predictor of perceived importance of forest ecosystem services: A case study from Poland. Sustainability, 15, 14154. DOI: 10.3390/su151914154.
- Janusz, A., Piszczek, M. 2008. Society’s expectations toward forests - A case study of visitors to the Beskid Sądecki Promotional Forest Complex (in Polish). Studia i Materiały Centrum Edukacji Przyrodniczo-Leśnej, 3 (19), 139–151.
- Jaszczak, R. 2008. Forest and forest economy within the range of influence of towns and cities in Poland (in Polish). Studia i Materiały Centrum Edukacji Przyrod-niczo-Leśnej, 3 (19), 152–171.
- Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., Tyger, T. 2015. Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice and Research, 31 (2), 195–2014. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203.
- Kaliszewski, A., Wysocka-Fijorek, E., Ciesielski, M., Stereńczak, K., Gołos, P. 2024. From forest functions to forest ecosystem services - the evolution of the attitude towards forest benefits in Poland. Sylwan, 168 (4), 233–252. DOI: 10.26202/sylwan/2024005.
- Kantola, S., Fagerholm, N., Nikula, A. 2023. Utilization and implementation of PPGIS in land use planning and decision-making from the perspective of organizations. Land Use Policy, 127, 106528. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106528.
- Karimi, A., Adams, V. 2019. Planning for the future: Combining spatially-explicit public preferences with tenure policies to support land-use planning. Land Use Policy, 82, 337–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.033.
- Korcz, N., Kamińska, A., Ciesielski, M. 2024. Is the level of quality of life related to the frequency of visits to natural areas? Forests, 15, 2257. DOI: 10.3390/f1512225.
- Korpilo, S., Nyberg, E., Vierikko, K., Nieminen, H., Arciniegas, G., Raymond, C.M. 2023. Developing a Multi-sensory Public Participation GIS (MSPPGIS) method for integrating landscape values and soundscapes of urban green infrastructure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 230, 104617. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104617.
- Maes, J. et al. 2016. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services, 17, 14–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023.
- Müller, S.M., Peisker, J., Bieling, C., Linnemann, K., Reidl, K., Schmieder, K. 2019. The importance of cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity for landscape visitors in the biosphere reserve Swabian Alb (Germany). Sustainability, 11, 2650. DOI: 10.3390/su11092650.
- Nastran, M., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., Cvejić, R. 2022. Stakeholders’ perceptions on the role of urban green infrastructure in providing ecosystem services for human well-being. Land, 11 (2), 299. DOI: 10.3390/land11020299.
- Niedziałkowski, K., Chmielewski, P. 2023. Challenging the dominant path of forest policy? Bottom-up, citizen forest management initiatives in a top-down governance context in Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 154, 103009. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103009.
- Pearlmutter, D. et al. 2017. The urban forest. Cultivating green infrastructure for people and the environment. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50280-9.
- Pérez-del Hoyo, R., Mora H. 2019. Knowledge society technologies for smart cities development. In,· Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges. Elsevier, 229–248. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816639-0.00011-9.
- Ramirez Aranda, N., De Waegemaeker, J., Van de Weghe, N. 2023. The evolution of public participation GIS (PPGIS) barriers in spatial planning practice. Applied Geography, 155, 102940. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102940.
- Skłodowski, J., Gołos, P., Skłodowski, M., Oźga, W. 2013. The preferences of visitors to selected forest areas for tourism and recreational purposes (in Polish). Leśne Prace Badawcze, 74, 293–305.
- Sławski, M., Sławska, M. 2009. Forest as a recreation area e analysis of social expectations in Rogów community (in Polish). Studia i Materiały Centrum Edukacji Przyrodniczo-Leśnej, 4 (23), 140–150.
- Taczanowska, K., Latosińska, B., Brandenburg, C., Leisch, F., Czachs, C., Muhar, A. 2023. Lobbying in social media as a new source of survey bias. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 44, 100689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2023.100689.
- Tolvanen, A. et al. 2020. The relationship between people’s activities and values with the protection level and biodiversity. Tourism Management, 81, 104141. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104141.
- Tyrväinen, L. 2001. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 75–92.
- Ustawa. 2023. Act of 27 March 2003 on Spatial Planning and Development (in Polish). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20030800717/U/D20030717Lj.pdf (access on 31 December 2025).
- Ustawa. 2018. Act of 10 May 2018 on the Protection of Personal Data (in Polish). Available at: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20180001000 (access on 31 December 2025).
- Varela, E., Jacobsen, J.B., Mavsar, R. 2017. Social demand for multiple benefits provided by Aleppo pine forest management in Catalonia, Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 17, 539–550. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-016-1038-8.
- Vaz, A., Gonçalves, J., Pereira, P., Santarém, F., Vicente, J., Honrado, J. 2019. Earth observation and social media: Evaluating the spatiotemporal contribution of nonnative trees to cultural ecosystem services. Remote Sensing of Environment, 230. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.012.
- Vilalta Capdevila, T. et al. 2024. Advancements in monitoring: a comparison of traditional and applicationbased tools for measuring outdoor recreation. PeerJ, 12. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17744.
- Vos, S. et al. 2022. Residential green space is associated with a buffering effect on stress responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in mothers of young children, a prospective study. Environmental Research, 208, 112603. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112603.
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 136
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2026
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2026
Published on: Jun 25, 2026
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Mariusz Ciesielski, Miłosz Tkaczyk, Lidia Teleszko, Fruzsina Stefan, Karolina Taczanowska, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.