Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

LSD test for statistical significance of differences in the magnitude of mean values of stem dry mass (%), root dry mass (%), root volume (cm3) and shoot length (cm) of Ginkgo biloba plants under water stress
| Measured parameters | Variant | Count | P-value | Mean | Homogeneous groups group differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A cm2) Dry mass of stem | S | 30 30 | 0.0501 | 43.5 | a |
| C | 30 30 | 42.7 | a | ||
| Dry mass of rootsSLAt (cm2 × g−1) water contentw | S | 30 30 | 0.0000 | 32.5 | a |
| C | 30 30 | 27.2 | b | ||
| RWC (%) root amountRoot volume | S | 309390 30 | 0.0000 | 10 | b |
| C | 3030909030230 | 16.6 | a | ||
| Length of shoots | S | 30 | 0.0014 | 13.6 | b |
| C | 30303 | 21.1 | a |
LSD test for statistical significance of differences in the magnitude of mean values of leaf area (LA in cm2), specific leaf area (SLA in cm2·g−1) and relative leaf water content (RWC in %) of Ginkgo biloba L_ plants under water stress
| Measured parameters | Variant | Count | P-value | Mean | Homogeneous groups group differences | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (cm2) LA | S | 30 90 | 0.67 | 243,96 349.5 | A a | |
| C | 30 90 | 267,73 345.4 | B a | |||
| SLAt (cm2 · g−1) SLA | S | 30 90 | 0.0000 | 44,6167 45.6 | B a | |
| C | 30 90 | 40,9133 42.5 | A b | |||
| RWC (%) RWC | S | 309390 90 | 0.0104 | 91,23 91.6 | A b | |
| C | 309090 90 | 93,3933 94.5 | B a | |||
LSD test for statistical significance of the differences in the magnitude of the mean values of leaf area (LA in cm2) and specific leaf area (SLA in cm2·g−1) of the top five leaves of Ginkgo biloba influenced by water stress
| Measured parameters | Variant | Count | P-value | Mean | Homogeneous groups group differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | S | 30 | 0.0003 | 54.4 | b |
| C | 30 | 100 | a | ||
| SLASLAt (cm2 · g−1) water contentw | S | 30 | 0.2616 | 54 | a |
| C | 30 | 51 | a |