Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Characteristics of the tested wild service tree (Sorbus torminalis (L_) Crantz) provenances
| IDa | Provenance | Latitude N | Longitude E | Altitude m a.s.l. | Forest site conditions | Soil typeb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Goraj | 52°53′ | 16°31′ | 50–80 | Fresh broadleaved forests | Brown soils |
| 9 | Bytyń | 52°28′ | 16°28′ | 100 | Fresh broadleaved forests | Leached brown soils |
| 12 | Kawęczyńskie Brzęki Reserve | 52°24′ | 18°37′ | 120–130 |
| Brown soils |
| 15 | Piaski | 51°49′ | 17°12′ | 130 | Fresh broadleaved forests | Stagnosols, brown soils |
| 17 | Jawor | 51°01′ | 16°08′ | 300–395 | Upland forests, mixed upland forests | Raw siliceous rocky soils (litho-sols), rankers, acid brown soils |
| 18 | Lubiechowa | 51°00′ | 15°50′ | 360 | upland forests | Brown soils |
| 19 | Kamień Śląski Reserve | 50°33′ | 18°05′ | 180–190 | Fresh broadleaved forests, fresh mixed broadleaved forests | Rusty soils, brown soils |
| 20 | Białowodzka Góra Reserve | 49°41′ | 20°38′ | 500–550 | Mountain forests | Brown soils, leached brown soils |
Number of seedling planted at the JAM and SYC common gardens according to provenances and open pollinated (OP) familiesa
| Provenance | JAM | SYC | No. | OP family | JAM | SYC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 6 | 93 | 115 | 1 | 6/3 | 25 | 25 |
| 2 | 6/7 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 3 | 6/8 | 38 | 30 | |||
| 4 | 6/10 | - | 30 | |||
| 9 | 55 | 85 | 1 | 9/1 | - | 30 |
| 2 | 9/2 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 3 | 9/8 | 25 | 25 | |||
| 12 | 30 | 30 | 1 | 12/4 | 30 | 30 |
| 15 | 188 | 193 | 1 | 15/3 | 30 | 30 |
| 2 | 15/4 | 30 | 35 | |||
| 3 | 15/5 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 4 | 15/6 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 5 | 15/8 | 38 | 38 | |||
| 6 | 15/10 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 17 | 120 | 180 | 1 | 17/3 | 30 | 30 |
| 2 | 17/5 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 3 | 17/8 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 4 | 17/10 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 5 | 17/12 | - | 30 | |||
| 6 | 17/13 | - | 30 | |||
| 18 | 200 | 206 | 1 | 18/1 | 25 | 25 |
| 2 | 18/2 | 30 | 36 | |||
| 3 | 18/3 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 4 | 18/4 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 5 | 18/5 | 25 | 25 | |||
| 6 | 18/9 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 7 | 18/10 | 30 | 30 | |||
| 19 | - | 30 | 1 | 19/4 | - | 30 |
| 20 | 64 | 211 | 1 | 20/2 | - | 30 |
| 2 | 20/3 | 39 | 36 | |||
| 3 | 20/4 | - | 30 | |||
| 4 | 20/5 | 25 | 25 | |||
| 5 | 20/8 | - | 30 | |||
| 6 | 20/11 | - | 30 | |||
| 7 | 20/12 | - | 30 | |||
| Total | 750 | 1050 | 750 | 1050 | ||
Pearson correlation coefficients for the survival of OP families between the JAM and SYC sites in different years (highlighted diagonal values) and between different years at the same site (JAM – above the diagonal and SYC – below the diagonal)
| 2012-09 | 2013-09 | 2015-09 | 2019-09 | 2020-09 | 2021-09 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-09 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| 2013-09 | 0.92 | 0.50 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| 2015-09 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| 2019-09 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 2020-09 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 2021-09 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 |