Have a personal or library account? Click to login
J-Integral Analysis of Crack Behavior in Composite Material Geometries Cover

J-Integral Analysis of Crack Behavior in Composite Material Geometries

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Schematic of the composite plate with an edge crack.
Schematic of the composite plate with an edge crack.

Figure 2.

Crack-tip geometry showing the coordinate system and the J-integral contour.
Crack-tip geometry showing the coordinate system and the J-integral contour.

Figure 3.

Local coordinate system defined ahead of the crack tip, illustrating the stress components (σx, σy, τxy, τyx), radial distance r, and angle θ.
Local coordinate system defined ahead of the crack tip, illustrating the stress components (σx, σy, τxy, τyx), radial distance r, and angle θ.

Figure 4.

Stress vs. distance r from notch tip at θ = 0° (theoretical method).
Stress vs. distance r from notch tip at θ = 0° (theoretical method).

Figure 5.

Assembly of composite materials.
Assembly of composite materials.

Figure 6.

The Von Mises stress contour plot of the composite plate without a hole, presented at different radial distances (r) from the crack tip.
The Von Mises stress contour plot of the composite plate without a hole, presented at different radial distances (r) from the crack tip.

Figure 7.

Theoretical vs. numerical σyy stress as a function of r (mm) from the notch tip at θ = 0°.
Theoretical vs. numerical σyy stress as a function of r (mm) from the notch tip at θ = 0°.

Figure 8.

Dimensions of perforated plate.
Dimensions of perforated plate.

Figure 9.

Perforated plate mesh.
Perforated plate mesh.

Figure 10.

The Von Mises stress contour plot of the composite plate hole of varying radii (r) and distances (S) from the notch tip.
The Von Mises stress contour plot of the composite plate hole of varying radii (r) and distances (S) from the notch tip.

Figure 11.

The plots of the stress σyy versus for different values of distance S (in the plate with one hole).
The plots of the stress σyy versus for different values of distance S (in the plate with one hole).

Figure 12.

Plots of the σyy stress for different average values of the distance S (in the plate with and without a hole).
Plots of the σyy stress for different average values of the distance S (in the plate with and without a hole).

Figure 13.

J-integral plots for S = 35 mm (in the plate with and without hole).
J-integral plots for S = 35 mm (in the plate with and without hole).

Variation of the σyy stress as a function of different average distance (S) values in the composite laminate, with and without a hole_

r (mm)σyy (MPa) – Without Holeσyy (MPa) – With Hole
0.2884.9851.92
0.6454.6444.84
1.0345.9357.98
1.4290.6257.14
2.0241.9227.88
2.4204.2199.6
2.8190.1186.46
3.0196.9182.92
4.0170.2160.44
5.0152143.36

Mechanical Properties of the Composite Material

PropertySymbolValueUnit
Longitudinal Young’s modulusE1140000MPa
Transverse Young’s modulusE2 = E39000MPa
In-plane shear modulusG12 = G135000MPa
Out-of-plane shear modulusG235000MPa
Poisson’s ratioV12 = V130.30
Poisson’s ratioV230.40
Densityρ1.5 × 10−6kg/mm3

The stresses σyy calculated by the theoretical analysis_

rradius (mm)J (N/mm2)σyy theoretical (MPa)
0.215.9894.92
0.615.9516.68
115.9400.22
1.415.9338.25
215.9283.00
2.415.9258.34
2.815.9239.18
315.9231.07
415.9200.11
515.9178.98

σyy vs_ distance r from notch tip at θ = 0° (theoretical vs_ numerical results)_

r (mm)σyy theoretical (MPa)σyy numerical (MPa)
0.2894.92884.9
0.6516.68454.6
1400.22345.9
1.4338.25290.6
2283.00242.2
2.4258.34220.7
2.8239.18190.1
3231.07197.1
4200.11170.2
5178.98152

Variation of stress σyy as a function different value of the distance (S) in the plate with a hole and without a hole_

r (mm)σyy (MPa)σyy (MPa)σyy (MPa)σyy (MPa)σyy (MPa)σyy (MPa)
0.2885.1885846.3831.7811.5884.9
0.6455.4455454.6442.2427454.6
1387.2371.1364.5333.7333.4345.9
1.4281.8279.9251.6242.6229.8290.6
2237.7228.3228.1226.5218.8241.9
2.4202.5201.4200.9199.5199204.2
2.8189.1186.9186.1185.5184,7190.1
3190.6187.4179.5179.1177.7196.9
4169.4162.9157.3155.7154.9170.2
5150.7144.4142.1140.3139.3152

Variation of the J-integral as a function of different average distance (S) values in the composite laminate, with and without a hole_

r (mm)J (N/mm2) S = 15 mmJ (N/mm2) S = 20 mmJ (N/mm2) S = 25 mmJ (N/mm2) S = 30 mmJ (N/mm2) S = 35J (N/mm2) Without holes
0.217.8517.8418.7819.4120.0117.86
0.614.2914.2714.2514.3914.4614.22
115.0515.3114.8514.5114.7513.80
1.413.7813.8813.8013.9413.8813.67
214.0113.9213.9013.7113.6413.57
2.414.1914.1013.9213.7213.6613.59
2.814.4514.0913.9013.8813.7213.59
314.6114.1213.9313.8813.6213.52
415.4115.3514.2713.9913.8613.49
516.4615.0614.6214.2413.9813.48
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2300-7591 | Journal ISSN: 2081-7738
Language: English
Published on: Jul 14, 2025
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Regad Abdelmalek, Kacimi Noureddine, Mebarki Hichem, Mohamed Ikhlef Chaouch, Djedai Hayette, Nehila Abdelhak, Damba Nadhir, Oudrane Abdellatif, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT