Have a personal or library account? Click to login
AI as a reflective coach in graduate ESL practicum: activity theory insights into student-teacher development Cover

AI as a reflective coach in graduate ESL practicum: activity theory insights into student-teacher development

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Al-Adwani, A. M., & Dr. Al-Shammari, A. H. (2022). What EFL Student-teachers think about their preparation program: An evaluation of Kuwait’s English practicum program. Studies in English Language Teaching, 10(1), p. 89. https://doi. org/10.22158/selt.v10n1p89
  2. Al-Jaro, M., Asmawi, A., & Abdul-Ghafour, A.-Q. K. (2020). Supervisory support received by EFL student teachers during practicum: The missing link. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(4), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls. v2i4.437
  3. Al-Wadi, H. M. (2018). Facilitating in-service English language teacher trainees’ supervision through written feedback: Action research. International Education Studies, 11(9), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n9p1
  4. Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337’
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs (pp. 5771). Washington, DC: APA Books.
  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rance, N. (2014). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In A. Vossler & N. Moller (Eds.), The counselling & psychotherapy research handbook (pp. 183–197). London: Sage.
  7. Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2014). Thematic analysis. In P. Rohleder & A. Lyons (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp. 95–113). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
  9. Celen, K. M., & Akcan, S. (2017). Evaluation of an ELT practicum programme from the perspectives of supervisors, student teachers and graduates. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 6(3), Article 3. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtee/issue/43274/525713
  10. Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2014). Activity theory as a design framework for collaborative learning using Google applications technology. In D. K. W. Chiu, M. Wang, E. Popescu, Q. Li, & R. Lau (Eds.), New horizons in web based learning (Vol. 7697, pp. 140–149). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-662-43454-3_15
  11. Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.).
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth edition.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  13. Cuocci, S., Fattahi Marnani, P., Khan, I., & Roberts, S. (2023). A meta-synthesis of technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes research: A replication of Chen’s study. Languages, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020114
  14. Demszky, D., Liu, J., Hill, H. C., Jurafsky, D., & Piech, C. (2023). Can automated feedback improve teachers’ uptake of student ideas? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in a large-scale online course. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 016237372311692. https://doi. org/10.3102/01623737231169270
  15. Di Stefano, G., Gino, F., Pisano, G. P., & Staats, B. R. (2023). Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Can Spur Progress Along the Learning Curve (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2414478). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414478
  16. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In R.-L. Punamäki, R. Miettinen, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
  17. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  18. Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
  19. Fagan, K. (2022). The cultural practices and communicative teaching intent of Chinese student teachers in an American TESOL practicum. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2091573
  20. Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Reflective practice in L2 teacher education. In The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education. Routledge.
  21. Farr, F and Riordan, E. (2017) Prospective and practising teachers discuss the theory-practice divide through blogs and e-portfolios’, in Farrell, T. S. C. (ed.) TESOL Voices:Insider Accounts of Classroom Life-Preservice Teacher Education. Alexander, VA: TESOL Press.
  22. Gan, Z., & Lee, F. K. J. (2015). Understanding ESL student teachers’ learning of classroom practices in the practicum: A case study in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 251266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0258-x
  23. Gebhard, J. G. (2009). The practicum. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (1st ed., pp. 250258). Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781139042710.033
  24. Godínez Martínez, J. M. (2018). How effective is collaborative reflective practice in enabling cognitive transformation in English language teachers? Reflective Practice, 19(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1479688
  25. Goh, P. S., & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2
  26. Golombek, P. R., & Johnson, K. E. (2004). Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: Examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second-language teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching, 10(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000204388
  27. Graßmann, C., & Schermuly, C. C. (2021). Coaching with artificial intelligence: Concepts and capabilities. Human Resource Development Review, 20(1), 106126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982891
  28. Jensen, E., Dale, M., Donnelly, P. J., Stone, C., Kelly, S., Godley, A., & D’Mello, S. K. (2020). Toward automated feedback on teacher discourse to enhance teacher learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376418
  29. Jamal, A. (2023). The Role Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Teacher Education: Opportunities & Challenges. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 140–146. https://www. researchgate. net/profile/Afiya-Jamal/publication/369384184_The_Role_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_in_Teacher_Education_Opportunities_Challenges/links/64197dd792cfd54f8418b429/The-Role-of-Artificial-Intelligence-AI-in-Teacher-Education-Opportunities-Challenges.pdf
  30. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=432798
  31. Kadel, P. B. (2023). Issues of teaching practice in master of English education: Supervisors’ perspectives. Tribhuvan University Journal, 38(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v38i01.56144
  32. Kazaz, İ., & Alagözlü, N. (2020). Evaluation of teaching practicum for pre-service English language teachers: A scale development study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803902
  33. Korucu-Kis, S., & Demir, Y. (2019). A review of graduate research on reflective practices in English language teacher education: Implications. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1241–1261.
  34. Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2023). Technology-enhanced reflection and teacher development: A student teacher’s journey. RELC Journal, 54(2), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231161153
  35. Mann, S. (2015) Using screen capture software to improve the value of feedback on academic assignments in teacher education’, in Farrell, T. S. C. (ed.) International Perspectives on English Language Teacher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 160–180.
  36. Marwan, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Using activity theory to analyse contradictions in English teachers’ technology integration. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 115–125. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40299-018-0418-x
  37. Masoumpanah, Z., Tahririan, M. H., Afzali, K., & Alibabaee, A. (2019). An evaluation of practicum courses at Farhangian University. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 101–119. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1220758
  38. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation [Bookitem]. In Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  39. Mohd Ariff Albakri, I. S., Abdullah, M. H., & Jusoh, A. J. (2017). Lessons from experience: ESL student teachers’ reflection during practicum through reflective journals. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.8039
  40. Mollick, E. (2023, September 25). AI as team coach. Harvard Business Publishing. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/ai-as-team-coach?excludedSlug=student-use-cases-for-ai
  41. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2022). New modes of learning enabled by AI chatbots: Three methods and assignments (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4300783). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300783
  42. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023a). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475995
  43. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023b). UsingAI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243
  44. Mpofu, N. (2019). Reflecting on English student teachers’ critical incidents during teaching practicum. Journal for Language Teaching, 53(1), Article 1. https://doi. org/10.4314/jlt.v53i1.3
  45. Mwanza-Simwami, D. (2011). AODM as a framework and model for characterising learner experiences with technology. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 7(3), 75–85. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43493
  46. Ochieng’ Ong’ondo, C., & Borg, S. (2011). ‘We teach plastic lessons to please them’: The influence of supervision on the practice of English language student teachers in Kenya. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 509–528. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362168811412881
  47. Olaya Mesa, M. L. (2018). Reflective teaching: An approach to enrich the English teaching professional practice. HOW, 25(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.25.2.386
  48. Öztürk, E. Ö. (2021). Stress in Practicum: Voices of Preservice Teachers, Mentors, Supervisors and Administrators in an English Language Teacher Education (ELTE) Program. Journal on Educational Psychology, 14(4), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.14.4.17825
  49. Subedi, D. (2009). Assessing English language teaching student teachers on teaching practice. Journal of NELTA, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta. v14i1.3102
  50. Tang, E. L-Y and Lam, C. (2014), Building an Effective Online Learning Community (OLC) in Blog-based Teaching Portfolios’. The Internet and Higher Education, 20 79–85.
  51. Tasdemir, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2022). Improving discipline and classroom management using VEO in a Turkish University pre-service context. In P. Seedhouse (Ed.), Video enhanced observation for language teaching: Reflection and professional development (Paperback edition, pp. 243–251). Bloomsbury Academic.
  52. Vygotsky, L. S. (Lev S. (1978). Mind in society the development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Ed.). Harvard University Press.
  53. Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. In Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748645190
  54. Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Doing reflective practice: A data-led way forward: ELT Journal, 69(4), 351362. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv018
  55. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2023). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models (arXiv:2201.11903). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903
  56. Yazan, B. (2015). ‘You Learn Best When You’re in There’: ESOL teacher learning in the practicum. The CATESOL Journal. https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/%22You-Learn-Best-When-You’re-in-There%22%3A-ESOL-Teacher-Yazan/8305def04a 991a8575ba39214cbf2ca2af9baf66
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Published on: Nov 8, 2024
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Julian L’Enfant, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.