Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A systematic review of Chinese students’ online learning experiences Cover

A systematic review of Chinese students’ online learning experiences

By:
Open Access
|Jul 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Systematic review PRISMA* chart.
* PRISMA is the abbreviation for The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, which was designed to improve the quality of systematic reviews (Page et al., 2021).
Systematic review PRISMA* chart. * PRISMA is the abbreviation for The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, which was designed to improve the quality of systematic reviews (Page et al., 2021).

Figure 2:

Country of the first author(s).
Country of the first author(s).

Figure 3:

Country of research.
Country of research.

Figure 4:

Country of HE institutions.
Country of HE institutions.

Figure 5:

The use of theories.
The use of theories.

Figure 6:

Research approaches.
Research approaches.

Figure 7:

Research design.
Research design.

Figure 8:

Main research themes.
Main research themes.

Figure 9:

Limitations of previous research.
Limitations of previous research.

Figure 10:

Authors’ attitudes to different aspects of Chinese culture.
Authors’ attitudes to different aspects of Chinese culture.

Figure 11:

The benefits of online learning. ICT, information and communication technology.
The benefits of online learning. ICT, information and communication technology.

Figure 12:

The challenges of online learning.
The challenges of online learning.

Characteristics of Chinese culture stated in the selected articles

Chinese cultureStatementsnExamples
AuthoritativeNegative8Nield (2004)
CompetitiveNegative3Du (2016)
Face-savingNegative3Yong (2021)
CollectivismNeutral8Du et al. (2016)
HarmonyPositive4Zhang (2013)
Chinese educationAttitudenExamples
Teacher-driven instructionNegative5Windsor (2021)
Achievement-focussedNegative4Commander et al. (2016)
AuthoritarianNegative1Turnbull et al. (2021)
Spoon-fed educationNegative1Xiao and Hurd (2010)
Content-based instructionNeutral3Tsai (2019)
Fundamental skills trainingNeutral3Tsai (2019)
Difficult subjectsNeutral1Nield (2004)
Long-term orientedNeutral1Thompson and Ku (2005)
Learner characteristicsAttitudenExamples
ConservativeNegative5Zhu et al. (2009a)
SilentNegative5Zhu et al. (2009a)
Afraid of losing faceNegative4Law et al. (2013)
Avoiding conflictNegative2Zhang (2013)
DiligentPositive2Du (2016)
AdaptivePositive2Cheng and Ding (2021)
HolisticPositive1Thompson and Ku (2005)
Learner behavioursAttitudenExamples
Being passiveNegative9Windsor (2021)
Not asking for teacher guidanceNegative9Law et al. (2013)
Being pragmatic and utilitarianNegative6Law et al. (2013)
A lack of critical thinkingNegative3Cheng and Ding (2021)
Content-oriented in discussionsNeutral1Zhu et al. (2009a)
Searching for new knowledgePositive1Zhang (2013)

Specific theories used in the selected articles

Specific theoriesnExamples
Learning-related theories (n = 11)
Self-regulated learning theory5Hou (2020)
Motivation theory2Xiao and Hurd (2010)
Flow theory1Zhou et al. (2021)
Language learning theory1Zheng et al. (2016)
Learner beliefs1Xiao and Hurd (2010)
Self-efficacy1Cui (2021)
Culture-related theories (n = 10)
Acculturation framework4Forbush and Foucault-Welles (2016)
Interpretivism1Thompson and Ku (2005)
Social constructivism1Zhu et al. (2009b)
Sociocultural constructivism1Commander et al. (2016)
Theory of culture1Thompson and Ku (2005)
Theory of cultural attributes1Zhang (2013)
Theory of interest1Du (2016)
Technology-related theories (n = 8)
Technology acceptance model3Cui (2021)
Diffusion of innovation1Duan et al. (2010)
Media richness theory1Zhou et al. (2021)
Multimedia learning theory1Tsai (2019)
Push–pull–mooring model1Jin et al. (2021)
Transactional distance theory1Liu (2020)
Studies without theories (n = 13)
Studies without theories13Cheng and Ding (2021)

Findings of the studies

Findings about specific online learning toolsNExamples
Automatic essay-scoring services improve students’ learning performance.4Hou (2020)
Internet/Web search/virtual platforms provide valuable information and help students seek academic resources.2Mikal et al. (2015)
Social networking tools discourage students’ cultural integration.2Forbush and Foucault-Welles (2016)
There are gender differences in students’ selections and usages of learning tools.2Ng and Tan (2017)
Social media platforms are effective in helping students to adjust to their lives abroad.1Chen and Yang (2015)
Learning management systems help students interact with others.1Turnbull et al. (2021)
Findings about Chinese students’ behavioursNExamples
Learning cultureThere is a strong cultural clash between Chinese traditional education and online pedagogic practices, which strongly affects students’ learning behaviours.4Yong (2021)
Learning motivationInterest in subjects and positive self-talk improve students’ motivation.2Zhou et al. (2021)
Learning outcomesStudents learning outcome is generally improved.2Commander et al. (2016)
Learning activitiesStudents are heavily involved in the discussion board.1Thompson and Ku (2005)
Learning environmentFeedback and help-seeking contribute to managing the learning environment.1Du (2016)
Learning strategiesStudents’ learning strategies are more in line with a social–constructivist learning approach.1Zhu et al. (2009b)
Findings about Chinese students’ emotions and perspectivesNExamples
Students are satisfied with online learning.3Zhou et al. (2021)
Students are less comfortable with online learning.2Zhu et al. (2009a)
Students show that they need pastoral care1Yong (2021)
Due to language problems, international students feel more isolated and alienated.1Kung (2017)
Students prefer to take blended learning.1Thompson and Ku (2005)

Final inclusion and exclusion criteria

CriteriaInclusionExclusion
Student nationalityChinese studentsNon-Chinese students
Education levelHigher educationNot higher education
Mode of deliveryOnline, distance, remote, emergency remote learningFace-to-face, blended, hybrid learning
Empirical studyPapers include empirical dataConceptual papers, literature review

Specific research topics

Specific topicsnExamples
Students attitudes (n = 19)
Perceptions5Zhu et al. (2009a)
Preference5Du et al. (2016)
Acceptance2Zhou et al. (2021)
Beliefs2Zheng et al. (2016)
Motivation2Xiao and Hurd (2010)
Satisfaction2Tsai (2019)
Self-efficacy1Cui (2021)
Learning technologies/tools (n = 15)
Internet/Web search/virtual platform3Mikal et al. (2015)
Social networking tools3Saw et al. (2013)
Learning management system3Turnbull et al. (2021)
Massive open online course (MOOC)/interactive courseware2Tsai (2019)
Automatic essay-scoring services1Hou (2020)
E-library1Ng and Tan (2017)
Game-based learning tool1Windsor (2021)
Synchronous communication tools1Liu (2020)
Learning activities (n = 15)
Discussion/knowledge co-construction6Commander et al. (2016)
Assessment/review exercises5Cheng and Ding (2021)
Groupwork3Du (2016)
Learning environmental structuring1Du (2016)
Learning subject (n = 10)
Language learning5Zhou et al. (2021)
Accounting education2Yong (2021)
Architecture1Wong et al. (2002)
Design education1Law et al. (2013)
Engineering education1Tawil et al. (2012)
Culture/cultural issues (n = 10)
Culture differences5Smith et al. (2005)
Intercultural adaptation4Mikal et al. (2015)
Influence of traditional culture1Zhang (2013)
Learning strategies (n = 7)
Self-regulated learning4Zhou et al. (2021)
Collaborative learning3Du (2016)
Learning performance (n = 5)
Learning outcomes3Tsai (2019)
Effectiveness2Windsor (2021)
Influencing factors (n = 5)
Factors on students’ online learning uptake4Cui (2021)
Factors on students’ online learning outcomes1Zhu et al. (2009a)

Data collection and analysis methods

Data collection methodsnExamples
Survey22Jin et al. (2021)
Interview15Law et al. (2013)
Experiment (pre- and post-tests)4Tsai (2019)
Secondary data4Thompson and Ku (2005)
Observation3Yong (2021)
Personal experience2Wong et al. (2002)
Students’ postings2Commander et al. (2016)
Data analysis methodsnExamples
Inferential statistics19Cheng and Ding (2021)
Descriptive statistics14Cheng and Ding (2021)
Qualitative coding9Hou (2020)
Thematic analysis3Yong (2021)
Content analysis2Smith et al. (2005)
Narrative analysis1Turnbull et al. (2021)
Systematic analysis1Turnbull et al. (2021)
Triangulation1Thompson and Ku (2005)

Search strings

Topic and clusterSearch string
Student“Chinese student” OR “Chinese learner” OR “Chinese * learner” OR “Chinese * student”
AND
Mode of delivery“online” OR “distance” OR “remote” OR “emergency”
AND
Education level“higher education” OR “universit*” OR “college” OR “tertiary education” OR “higher Institut*” OR “postgraduate” OR “undergraduate” OR “graduate” OR “PhD”
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 59
Published on: Jul 18, 2024
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2024 Yiyi Mao, Kyungmee Lee, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.