ANOVA results comparing the means of variables in relation to employment status
| F | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|
| Learner–learner interaction | 0.810 | 0.447 |
| Learner–tutor interaction | 0.127 | 0.881 |
| Self-regulated learning | 1.152 | 0.320 |
| Student satisfaction | 3.366 | 0.038* |
| Internet self-efficacy | 0.525 | 0.593 |
Variables in the equation
| Variables in the equation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | ||
| Step 1a | Learner–tutor interaction | 1.175 | 0.316 | 13.792 | 1 | 0.000 | 3.238 |
| Constant | -3.244 | 1.187 | 7.468 | 1 | 0.006 | 0.039 | |
| Step 2b | Learner–tutor interaction | 1.005 | 0.316 | 10.087 | 1 | 0.001 | 2.732 |
| Self-regulated learning | 1.101 | 0.485 | 5.166 | 1 | 0.023 | 3.008 | |
| Constant | -6.408 | 1.900 | 11.379 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.002 | |
Model summary
| Step | -2 Log likelihood |
|---|---|
| 1 | 114.931a |
| 2 | 109.374a |
Classification table
| Observed values | Predicted values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | Correct classification percentage | ||||
| 0.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Step1 | Satisfaction | 0.00 | 7 | 21 | 25.0 |
| 1.00 | 4 | 90 | 95.7 | ||
| Overall percentage | 79.5 | ||||
| Step 2 | Satisfaction | 0.00 | 9 | 19 | 32.1 |
| 1.00 | 4 | 90 | 95.7 | ||
| Overall percentage | 81.1 | ||||
Socio-demographic characteristics of the students participating in the survey
| Variable | Percentage (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Men | 58 | 48.5 |
| Women | 64 | 52.5 | |
| Age (years) | £30 | 19 | 15.6 |
| 31–40 | 55 | 45.1 | |
| 41–50 | 42 | 34.4 | |
| >50 | 6 | 4.9 | |
| Educational level | Tertiary Technical Institute (ATEI) graduates | 23 | 18.9 |
| University (AEI) graduates | 71 | 58.1 | |
| Master’s | 23 | 18.9 | |
| PhD | 5 | 4.1 | |
| Employment status | Fully employed | 96 | 78.7 |
| Semi-/part-time employed | 17 | 13.9 | |
| Unemployed | 9 | 7.4 | |
| Previous experience in distance learning | Yes | 23 | 18.9 |
| No | 99 | 81.1 |
Hosmer–Lemeshow Test
| Bήμα | Chi-square | Df | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.798 | 8 | 0.160 |
| 2 | 4.165 | 8 | 0.842 |
Mean and standard deviations
| Learner–learner interaction | Learner–tutor interaction | Self-regulated learning | Student satisfaction | Internet self-efficacy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.53 | 3.95 | 3.55 | 3.67 | 3.77 |
| Standard deviation | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 0.79 |
ANOVA results comparing the means of variables in relation to the number of modules
| F | p | |
|---|---|---|
| Learner–learner interaction | 1.061 | 0.349 |
| Learner–tutor interaction | 5.993 | 0.003* |
| Self-regulated learning | 2.449 | 0.091 |
| Student satisfaction | 0.966 | 0.384 |
| Internet self-efficacy | 1.534 | 0.220 |
Classification table Block 0
| Observed values | Predicted values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | Percentage correct | ||||
| 0 | 1 | ||||
| Step 0 | Satisfaction | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 0 | 94 | 100.0 | ||
| Overall percentage | 77.0 | ||||
Pearson correlation coefficients
| Learner–learner interaction | Learner–tutor interaction | Selfregulated learning | Satisfaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learner–learner interaction | Pearson correlation | 1 | |||
| Sig. (two-tailed) | |||||
| Learner–tutor interaction | Pearson correlation | 0.338** | 1 | ||
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | ||||
| Self-Regulated learning | Pearson correlation | 0.279** | 0.294** | 1 | |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.001 | |||
| Satisfaction | Pearson correlation | 0.276** | 0.465** | 0.395** | 1 |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| Internet Self-efficacy | Pearson correlation | 0.194* | 0.260** | 0.322** | 0.315** |
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.032 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |