Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Challenges in virtual team communication in the context of virtual exchange experience Cover

Challenges in virtual team communication in the context of virtual exchange experience

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Batarseh, F., Usher, J., & Daspit, J. (2017). Collaboration capability in virtual teams: Examining the influence on diversity and innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(04), 1750034. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500347
  2. Campbell, K. A., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., Gehrke, P., Graham, L., & Jack, S. M. (2021). Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2011–2028. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5010
  3. Cundill, G., Harvey, B., Tebboth, M., Cochrane, L., Currie-Alder, B., Vincent, K., Lawn, J., Nicholls, RJ., Scodanibbio, L., Prakash, A., New, M., Wester, P., Leone, M., Morchain, D., Ludi, E., DeMaria-Kinney, J., Khan, A., & Landry, M. E. (2019). Large-scale transdisciplinary collaboration for adaptation research: Challenges and insights. Global Challenges, 3(4), 1700132. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700132
  4. Custer, L., & Tuominen, A. (2017). Bringing “internationalization at home” opportunities to community colleges: Design and assessment of an online exchange activity between U.S. and Japanese students. Teaching Sociology, 45(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055×16679488
  5. Dervin, B. (2015). Dervin’s sense-making theory. In M. Al-Suqri, & A. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adaptation: Theories and trends, (pp. 59–80). IGI Global.
  6. Evolve. (2021). What is virtual exchange? Retrieved September 24, 2021 from https://evolve-erasmus.eu/about-evolve/what-is-virtual-exchange/
  7. Guth, S., & Helm, F. (Eds.). (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacies, and intercultural learning in the 21st Century. Peter Lang.
  8. Hakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2009). It takes two to tango: The close interplay between trust and identification in predicting virtual team effectiveness. The Journal of eWorking, 3(1), 17–32.
  9. Harrison, D., Price, K., Gavin, J., & Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069328
  10. Hecht, M. (1993). 2002 – A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs, 60, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376297
  11. Hedman, E., & Valo, M. (2015). Communication challenges facing management teams. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 1012–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2014-0074
  12. Herrington, T. (2010). Crossing global boundaries: Beyond intercultural communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(4), 516–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651910371303
  13. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  14. Järvenpää, S. & Leidner, D. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x
  15. Järvenpää, S., Shaw, T., & Staples, D. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028
  16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
  17. Krzaklewska, E. (2008). Why study abroad? An analysis of Erasmus students’ motivation. In F. Derwin, & M. Byram (Eds.), Students, staff, and academic mobility in higher education (pp. 82–98). Cambridge Scholars.
  18. Kupka, B., & Everett, A. (2007). The rainbow model of intercultural communication competence: A review and extension of existing research. Intercultural Communication Studies, XVI(2), 18–36.
  19. Lewis, R. (1996). When cultures collide: Leading across cultures. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
  20. Luo, H., & Yang, C. (2018). Twenty years of telecollaborative practice: Implications for teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 546–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1420083
  21. Luo, H., & Yang, C. (2022). Pedagogical benefits of Chinese-American virtual exchange: A study of student perceptions. ReCALL, 34(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000203
  22. Marciniak, D., & Winnicki, M. (2019). International student exchange: Motives, benefits, and barriers of participation. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, 133, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2019.133.8
  23. Maynard, M., & Gilson, L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 39(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113475361
  24. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). Sage.
  25. Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
  26. O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecommunication to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
  27. OPH. (2019). Ulkomaille lähtevien määrä laskenut kautta linjan. [The amount of students going abroad has declined]. Opetushallituksen uutinen [News of Finnish National Agency for Education] 5.11.2019. Read on 11.3.2022. https://www.oph.fi/fi/uutiset/2019/ulkomaanjaksolle-lahtevien-korkeakouluopiskelijoiden-maara-laskee
  28. Rothman, N. B., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2007). The social consequences of expressing emotional ambivalence in groups andteams. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & C. P. Anderson (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (vol. 10, pp. 275–308). CT: JAI Press.
  29. Schildt, H., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Power in sensemaking processes. Organization Studies, 41(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619847718
  30. Sherblom, J. (2020). Computer-mediated communication: Approaches and perspectives. Cognella.
  31. Spitzberg, B., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Intercultural Competence (pp. 2–34). Sage.
  32. Stärke, P. (2020). Implementation of virtual exchange at Goethe University Frankfurt: Applying organizational, pedagogical, and cultural aspects from three case studies [Master’s thesis, Tampere University of Applied Sciences].
  33. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 777–790.
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 61
Published on: Mar 28, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2023 Sanna Ala-Kortesmaa, Candice Muñoz, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.