Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An analysis of team projects outcomes from student and instructor perspectives in online computing degrees Cover

An analysis of team projects outcomes from student and instructor perspectives in online computing degrees

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Chang, Y., & Brickman, P. (2018). When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar52. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199
  2. Chapman Learning Commons. (2016). Working in groups [YouTube channel]. YouTube. Accessed January 16, 2022. from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIp_kFR5_jc&t=91s.
  3. Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2015.00049
  4. Chiriac, E. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learningstudents’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
  5. Falls, I., Bahhouth, V., Chuang, C., & Bahhouth, J. (2014).. Sage Open, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014525415
  6. Fini, E. H., Awadallah, F., Parast, M. M., & Abu-Lebdeh, T. (2018). The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/0.1080/03043797.2017.1393045
  7. Freeman, S., Theobald, R., Crowe, A., & Wenderoth, M. (2017). Likes attract: Students self-sort in a classroom by gender, demography, and academic characteristics. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 115–126.
  8. Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1998). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601657
  9. Hiter, S. (2021). What are CIOs looking for in current IT grads? Accessed January 22, 2022. https://www.cioinsight.com/careers/traits-cios-are-looking-for-current-it-grads/.
  10. Hosam, Al-S., & Noria, S. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
  11. Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1433–1447. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854
  12. Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
  13. Olaniyi, N. (2020). A survey on the use of e-Portfolios as a form of assessment in online computer science courses. In M. H. Miraz, P. S Excell, A. Ware, S. Soomro, M. Ali (Eds.), Emerging technologies in computing. iCETiC 2020. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering (p. 332). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60036-5_19
  14. Maimbo, H., & Pervan, G. (2005). Designing a Case Study Protocol for Application in IS Research. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Accessed 22 January 2022. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/45440.
  15. Peterson, A., Beymer, P., & Putnam, R. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517
  16. Pursel, B. (n.d.). Groups vs. teams. Accessed January 22, 2022, from https://sites.psu.edu/schreyer/groups-vs-teams/.
  17. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). (2019). Subject benchmark statement: Computing (Master’s). Resource document. Accessed January, 22 2022, from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements/computing.
  18. Race, P. (2001). Assessment Series No.9: A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. Resource document. Learning and teaching support network. Accessed January 16, 2022, from https://phil-race.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Self,_peer_and_group_ assessment.pdf.
  19. Riebe, L.,Roepen,D.,Santarelli, B., & Marchioro, G. (2010). Teamwork: Effectively teaching an employability skill. Education + Training, 52(6/7), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011068478
  20. Russo, D. & Stol, K.-J. (2022) Gender Differences in Personality Traits of Software Engineers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 48, no. 3, 819-834.https://doi.org/10.1145/2955110
  21. Smith, G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005
  22. Teaching and Learning Services. (2018). Using peer assessment to make teamwork work. Resource document. Teaching and learning services, McGill University. Accessed January 24, 2022. https://www.mcgill.ca/tls/files/tls/tls-group-peer-assessment-resource-doc-oct-2018.pdf.
  23. Teaching and Learning Services. (2021). Designing peer assessment assignments. Resource document. Teaching and learning services, McGill University. Accessed January 26, 2022, from https://www.mcgill.ca/tls/files/tls/tls_designing_peer_ assessment_assignments_-_march_2021.pdf.
  24. The Chartered Institute for IT (BCS). (2020). Guidelines on course accreditation information for universities and colleges. Resource document. Accessed January 22, 2022, from https://www.bcs.org/media/1209/accreditation-guidelines.pdf.
  25. Thorn, M. (2020). Are group assignments effective pedagogy or a waste of time? A review of the literature and implications for practice. Teaching Public Administration, 38(2), 257–269. https://doi. org/10.1177/0144739420904396
  26. Tucker, R., & Abbasi, N. (2016). Bad attitudes: Why design students dislike teamwork. Journal of Learning Design, 9(1), 1–20.
  27. University of Waterloo. (n.d. - a). Centre for teaching excellence—Making group contracts. Accessed September 16, 2021, from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/group-work/making-group-contracts.
  28. University of Waterloo. (n.d. - b). Centre for teaching excellence—Methods for assessing group work. Accessed September 24, 2021, from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/group-work/methods-assessing-group-work.
  29. Vera, F. (2021). Considering the effects of computer scientist stereotypes on mental health. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 40(3), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3104403
  30. Vivian, R., Falkner, K., & Falkner, N. (2013). Analysing computer science students’ teamwork role adoption in an online self-organised teamwork activity. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 105–114). https://doi.org/10.1145/2526968.2526980
  31. Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the projectbased learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9
  32. Wildman, J., Nguyen, D., & Duong, N. (2021). Student teamwork during COVID-19: Challenges, changes, and consequences. Small Group Research, 52(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420985185
  33. Wilson, K., Brickman, P, & Brame, C. (2018). Group work. Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0258
  34. Yin, R. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Published on: Mar 14, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2023 Nkaepe Olaniyi, Douglas Millward, Cathryn Peoples, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.