Inter-Learner Communication and Collaborative Learning as Quality Criteria of Distance Vocational Education and Training
References
- 1. Alexander, S., & Golja, T. (2007). Using students’ experiences to derive quality in an e-learning system: an institution’s perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 17-33.
- 2. Baldwin, S., & Trespalacios, J. (2017). Evaluation instruments and good practices in online education. Online Learning, 21(2). Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/91310.24059/olj.v21i2.913
- 3. Claus, E., & Dooley, K. (2005). Quality in distance education: A preliminary review of the literature. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492449.pdf
- 4. Collardyn, D., & Bjornavold, J. (2004). Validation of formal, non-formal and informal learning: Policy and practices in EU member states. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 69-89.10.1111/j.0141-8211.2004.00167.x
- 5. Creelman, A., Ehlers, U., & Ossiannilsson, E. (2014). Perspectives on MOOC quality – An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 3, 78-87.
- 6. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
- 7. DeGennaro, D. (2010). Grounded in theory: Immersing pre-service teachers in technology-mediated learning. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 338-359.
- 8. EADTU (2012). E-xcellence Next. Quality assessment for e-learning: a benchmarking approach. Maastricht: EADTU.
- 9. EADTU (2016). E-xcellence. Quality assessment for e-learning: a benchmarking approach. Maastricht: EADTU.
- 10. ECB Check (2012). Open ECB Check quality criteria for programmes. Retrieved from http://www.ecb-check.net/downloads/
- 11. Ehlers, U. (2004). Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2004(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&sp=full&article=101
- 12. Ellis, R., & Calvo, R. (2007). Minimum indicators to assure quality of LMS-supported blended learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 60-70.
- 13. European Commission (2018). Proposal for a council recommendation on promoting common values, inclusive education, and the European dimension of teaching, COM (2018) 023 final.
- 14. Garrison, R. (2000). Quality and access in distance education: Theoretical considerations. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 9-21). New York: Routledge.
- 15. Gunawardena, C., & McIsaak, M. (2004). Distance education. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communities and technology (pp.355-395). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- 16. Inglis, Α. (2005). Quality improvement, quality assurance and benchmarking: Comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6(1).10.19173/irrodl.v6i1.221
- 17. Jacobs, L., & DeWet, C. (2013). Evaluation of the Vocational Education Orientation Programme (VEOP) at a University in South Africa. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4), 68-89.10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1568
- 18. Jung, Ι. (2012). Asian learners’ perception of quality in distance education and gender differences. The International Review in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 1-25.10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1159
- 19. Kear, K., Rosewell, J., & Keith, W. (2012). Social networking and open educational resources: Updating quality assurance for e-learning excellence. Paper presented at the EADTU 25th Anniversary Conference “The Role of Open and Flexible Education in European Higher Education Systems for 2020: New Models, New Markets, New Media”, 27-28 September 2012, Paphos, Cyprus.
- 20. Kidd, T., & Song, H. (2007). A case study of the adult learners’ perception of instructional quality in web-based online courses. In Y. Inoue (Ed.), Online education for lifelong learning (pp. 271-291). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
- 21. Lenert, K., & Janes, D. (2017). The incorporation of quality attributes into online course design in higher education. International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, 32(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/987/1660
- 22. Letherby, G., & Bywaters, P. (2007). Extending social research: why? In G. Letherby & P. Bywaters (Eds.), Extending social research. Application, implementation and publication (pp. 19-36). Glasgow: Open University Press, McGraw Hill.
- 23. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386
- 24. Merisotis, J., & Phipps, R. (2000). Quality on the line. Benchmarks for success in internet based distance education. Washington: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
- 25. MOOQ. International organizations supporting the quality initiative MOOQ. Retrieved from http://www.mooc-quality.eu/survey
- 26. Moore, M. G. (2000). Transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.
- 27. Moore, M. G. (2013). The theory of transactional distance. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 66-85). New York: Routledge.
- 28. Mystakidis, S., Kostopoulos, K., & Amanatidis, E. (2017). Preconditions for quality distance vocational training: The case of the Patras University Center for Vocational Education and Training. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning, November 2017, Athens, Greece.
- 29. Official Journal of the European Union (2014). European Parliament resolution of 15 April 2014 on new technologies and open educational resources, 2017/C 443/05.
- 30. Official Journal of the European Union (2017). Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on inclusion in diversity to achieve a high quality education for all, 2017/C 62/02.
- 31. OpenupEd. OpenupEd Quality Label. Retrieved from http://www.openuped.eu/quality-label/
- 32. Ossiannilsson, E. (2012). Quality enhancement on e-learning. Campus-wide Information Systems, 29(4), 312-323.10.1108/10650741211253903
- 33. Ossiannilsson, E., & Landgren, L. (2012). Quality in e-learning – Α conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 42-51.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00439.x
- 34. Peres, P., Lima, L., & Lima, V. (2014). B-learning quality: Dimensions, criteria and pedagogical approach. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17(1), 56-75.10.2478/eurodl-2014-0004
- 35. Read, T., & Rodrigo, C. (2014). Toward a quality model for UNED MOOCs. eLearning Papers, 37, 43-50.
- 36. Reis, R., Gomes, T., & Reis, B. (2008). Learning management systems in vocational schools. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 8(5), 580-590.
- 37. ReΟpen. About the project. Retrieved from http://www.reopen.eu/about-project/
- 38. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- 39. Rogers, A. (2002). Teaching adults. Berkshire: Open University Press.
- 40. Rosewell, J., & Jansen, D. (2014). The OpenupEd Quality Label: Benchmarks for MOOCs. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 3, 88-100.
- 41. SEQUENT (2015). Supporting Quality in e-learning European Networks – SEQUENT. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/supporting-quality-in-e-learning-european-networks-sequent/
- 42. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
- 43. Stacey, E. (1999). Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 14-33.
- 44. Ubachs, G. (2009). E-xcellence. Quality assessment for e-learning: a benchmarking approach. Heerlen: EADTU.
- 45. UNIQUe (2011). European Universities Quality in e-Learning. Information package. Brussels: EFQUEL.
- 46. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Gaurain & Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp.34-40). New York: Scientific American Books.
- 47. Wang, Y. C. (2014). Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners: A social constructivist approach to language teaching. System, 42(1), 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.00710.1016/j.system.2014.01.007
- 48. Ward, M., Peters, G., & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 57-77.10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.867
- 49. Williams, K. (2015). SEQUENT. Deliverable 4, Handbook for quality in e-learning procedures. Retrieved from https://www.sequent-network.eu/images/Guidelines/Sequent_Handbook_for_Quality_in_e-learning_procedures.pdf
- 50. Yeung, D. (2001). Toward an effective quality assurance model of web-based learning: The perspective of academic staff. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(4). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter44/yeung44.html
- 51. Yerevan Communiqué (2015). EHEA Ministerial Conference, Yerevan Communiqué 2015. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/70/7/YerevanCommuniqueFinal_613707.pdf
- 52. Zawacki-Richter, O., Baker, E., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21-50.10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 98 - 112
Published on: Jan 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Anastasia Batsila, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.