References
- Altshuler, A. A., & Behn, R. D. (2010). Innovation in American government: Challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas Washington, United States: Brookings Institution Press.
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2011). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010-11 Canberra, Australia: ACT.
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2014). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2013-2014 Canberra, Australia: ACT.
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2016). State of the Service Report 2015-16 Canberra, Australia: ACT.
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2017). State of the Service Report 2016-17 Canberra, Australia: ACT.
- Barnett, J., Vasileiou, K., Djemil, F., Brooks, L., & Young, T. (2011). Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 11(1), 1-12.
- Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society Bristol, United Kingdom: Bristol University Press.
- Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in the public sector New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of Policy Process (2nd ed.). Colorado, United States: Westview.
- Bloch, C. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework for measuring public sector innovation. Measuring innovation in the public sector in the Nordic countries: Toward a common statistical approach‟“Copenhagen Manual”
- Borins, S. (2006). The challenge of innovation in government: Endowment for the business of government Arlington, United States: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
- Bowden, A. (2005). Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning. Public Policy and Administration 20(3), 56-68.
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2), 27-40.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77-101.
- Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods Oxford, United States: Oxford University Press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.
- Currie, G., Humphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D., & McManus, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility? Public Administration 86(4), 987-1008.
- Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 19(3), 495-522.
- Demircioglu, M. A. (2018). The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations. International Journal of Public Administration 41(15), 1302-1313.
- Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy 46(9), 1681-1691.
- Deschamps, J. P. (2005). Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy & Leadership 33(5), 31-38.
- Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research London, United Kingdom: Sage.
- Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government Cambridge, United States: Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School.
- Elison, S., Ward, J., Davies, G., & Moody, M. (2014). Implementation of computer-assisted therapy for substance misuse: a qualitative study of Breaking Free Online using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory. Drugs and Alcohol Today 14(4), 207-218.
- Evans, A. J., & Burger, V. L. J. (2016). An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organisations. International Journal of Innovation Science 8(4), 404-422.
- Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1), 80-92.
- Franza, R. M., & Grant, K. P. (2006). Improving federal to private sector technology transfer. Research Technology Management 49(3), 36-40.
- Glor, E. D. (1998). What do we know about enhancing creativity and innovation? A review of literature. The Innovation Journal 3(1), 1-8.
- Golembiewski, R. T., & Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational innovation and the science/craft of management. Current Topics in Management 5, 263-280.
- Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59-82.
- Hadfield, L. (2010). Balancing on the edge of the archive: the researcher’s role in collecting and preparing data to deposit. Timescapes Working Paper Series 2010(2), 60-74.
- Hamson, N. (2004). Why innovation doesn’t work: and what to do about it. The Innovation Journal 9(1), 1-7.
- Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9), 1277-1288.
- Kao, J. (2007). Innovation nation: How America is losing its innovation edge, why it matters, and what we can do to get it back New York, United States: Free Press.
- Kellough, J. E., & Nigro, L. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration 22(2), 146-166.
- Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform London, United Kingdom: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.
- Koch, P., & Hauknes, J. (2005). On innovation in the public sector: Academic Summary Report of Publin Oslo, Norway: NIFU STEP, Publin Report No. D20.
- Langergaard, L. L., & Scheuer, D. J. (2012). Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovation. In A. L. Macaulay, I. Miles, J. Wilby, L. Y. Tan, L. Zhao, & B. Theodoulidis (Eds.), Case Studies in Service Innovation (pp. 167-193). New York, United States: Springer New York.
- Latham, J. R. (2014). Research design canvas: A framework for designing and aligning the “DNA” of your study Monument, Colorado: Leadership Plus Design, Ltd.
- Management Advisory Committee [MAC]. (2010). Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public service Canberra, Australia: Australian Public Service Commission.
- May, T. (2001). Social research Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
- Miller, R. (1999). The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier? Foresight 1(5), 467-472.
- Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review 10(1), 3-20.
- Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector London, United Kingdom: Cabinet office.
- Myers, M. D. (1994). A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4(4), 185-201.
- Napier, C. J. (1989). Research directions in accounting history. The British Accounting Review 21(3), 237-254.
- Nathan, H., & Thomas, C. (2012). A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker series. Journal of Management Development 31(8), 826-844.
- Neuman, W. L. (2005). Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, United States: Pearson.
- Page, S. (2005). What’s new about the new public management? Administrative change in the human services. Public Administration Review 65(6), 713-727.
- Pärna, O. (2014). Managerial and contextual factors influencing innovation in information technology-based public sector services: an exploratory cross-national study. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Tartu.
- Pollach, I. (2012). Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organizational Research Methods 15(2), 263-287.
- Raipa, A., & Giedraityte, V. (2014). Innovation process barriers in public sector: A comparative analysis in Lithuania and the European Union. International Journal of Business and Management 9(10), 10-26.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students Harlow, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.
- Setnikar, C., S., & Petkovšek, V. (2013). Private and public sector innovation and the importance of cross-sector collaboration. Journal of Applied Business Research 29(6), 1597-1606.
- Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences 15(3), 398-405.
- Varney, D. S. (2006). Service transformation: A better service for citizens and businesses, a better deal for the taxpayer London, United Kingdom: TSO.
- Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017a). Exploring leadership styles for innovation: an exploratory factor analysis. Engineering Management in Production and Services 9(1), 7-17.
- Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017b). Statistical data analysis of culture for innovation using an open data set from the Australian Public Service. In A. Calì, P. Wood, N. Martin, & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10365, pp. 78-89). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
- Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017c). Workplace innovation: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation. Management and Production Engineering Review 8(2), 57-68.
- Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2018). Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 26(5), 890-914.
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods Beverly Hills, United States: Sage publications.