
Figure 1:
Map of the northern region of Portugal.
Table 1:
Business information
| Business Information | Options | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurant Type | FDR | 93 | 29.9 |
| TR | 112 | 36.0 | |
| LR | 106 | 34.1 | |
| Ownership Structure | Chain | 163 | 52.4 |
| Independent | 148 | 47.6 | |
| Year of Service | < 1 | 19 | 6.1 |
| 1–4 | 62 | 19.9 | |
| 5–9 | 71 | 22.8 | |
| 10–14 | 110 | 35.4 | |
| 15–19 | 34 | 10.9 | |
| > 20 | 15 | 4.8 | |
| Management style (By...) | The boss(es) | 123 | 39.5 |
| Department heads | 133 | 42.8 | |
| Professional CEO | 55 | 17.7 | |
| Number of Branches | No | 101 | 32.5 |
| 2–10 | 109 | 35.0 | |
| 11–25 | 66 | 21.2 | |
| > 26 | 35 | 11.2 | |
| Number of Personnel (people) | < 10 | 18 | 5.8 |
| 10–49 | 127 | 40.8 | |
| 50–99 | 76 | 24.4 | |
| 100–149 | 58 | 18.6 | |
| 150–199 | 25 | 8.0 | |
| > 200 | 7 | 2.3 |
Table 2:
Business Operation information
| Business Operations | Options | FDR | TR | LR | TOTAL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| A’la carte service meal | Just dinner | 66 | 71.0 | 32 | 28.6 | 15 | 14.2 | 113 | 36.3 |
| Lunch & Dinner | 22 | 23.6 | 71 | 63.4 | 5 | 4.7 | 98 | 31.5 | |
| All of them | 5 | 5.4 | 9 | 8.0 | 86 | 81.1 | 100 | 32.2 | |
| Guest profile | Local guests | 10 | 10.8 | 73 | 65.2 | 72 | 67.9 | 155 | 49.8 |
| Foreign guests | 24 | 25.8 | 12 | 10.7 | 2 | 1.9 | 38 | 12.3 | |
| Both of them | 59 | 63.4 | 27 | 24.1 | 32 | 30.2 | 118 | 37.9 | |
| Culinary preferences of foreign guests | Turkish cuisine | 28 | 30.1 | 73 | 65.2 | 106 | 100.0 | 207 | 66.6 |
| Foreign cuisines | 18 | 19.3 | 11 | 9.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 29 | 9.3 | |
| Both of them | 47 | 50.6 | 28 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 75 | 24.1 | |
| The culinary preference of local guests | Turkish cuisine | 38 | 40.9 | 73 | 65.2 | 106 | 100.0 | 217 | 69.8 |
| Foreign cuisines | 20 | 21.5 | 10 | 8.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 30 | 9.6 | |
| Both of them | 35 | 37.6 | 29 | 25.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 64 | 20.6 | |
| TOTAL | 93 | 29.9 | 112 | 36.0 | 106 | 34.1 | 311 | 100.0 | |
Table 3:
Measurment Model
Table 4:
Interaction Quality (IQ) Assessment
| Management Quality | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| M±SD | M±SD | M±SD | ||
| FDR | 2.47±1.25 | 3.89±1.15 | 4.57±1.30 | |
| TR | 2.83±1.15 | 3.73±1.14 | 3.49±1.15 | |
| LR | 2.55±1.10 | 3.45±1.05 | 3.10±1.11 | |
| Kruskal Walls H | X2 | 21.303 | 33.661 | 32.175 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Friedman | X2 | 979.035 | ||
| p | 0.000 | |||
Table 5:
Physical Environment Assessment
| Management Quality | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| M±SD | M±SD | M±SD | ||
| FDR | 3.74±1.23 | 4.37±0.92 | 4.30±0.96 | |
| TR | 2.82±1.20 | 3.66±1.17 | 3.42±1.18 | |
| LR | 2.34±1.22 | 2.91±1.31 | 2.58±1.27 | |
| Kruskal Walls H | X2 | 221.921 | 259.730 | 336.944 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Friedman | X2 | 793.741 | ||
| p | 0.000 | |||