Have a personal or library account? Click to login

A new scale to measure customer’s expectations about service dimensions: Application to the hotel service

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Consistency and reliability analysis of the dimensions complexity degree (CD), information and communication power (ICP), and environment and social responsibility (ESR)_

VariableKMO testCronbach’s alpha (score reliability)ItemComponent 1Component 2AVECR
29.CD_buy0.751
30.CD_ort0.639
31.CD_cfm0.783
Complexity degree (CD)0.9100.89532.CD_spc0.797 0.5320.900
33.CD_do0.779
34.CD_ins0.850
35.CD_flex0.818
36.CD_exp0.699
37.ICP_pro0.696
38.ICP_ling0.804
Information and communication power (ICP)0.8400.85539.ICP_con0.852 0.5630.865
40.ICP_det0.840
41.ICP_acc0.820
42.ESR_clm0.569
43.ESR_mat0.853
44.ESR_wtr0.893
Environment and social responsibility (ESR)0.9170.92945.ESR_recy0.885 0.6110.926
46.ESR_eco0.903
47.ESR_pol0.862
48.ESR_stff0.741
49.ESR_vol0.808

Level of controllability of service dimensions by the service provider_

DimensionsBrief definitionControl by the service providerAuthors
Degree of customisation or standardisation/service package structureLevel of adaptation of the service to each customer’s needs and/or desires.YesSalegna and Fazel (2013); Cunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Silvestro et al. (1992); Bowen (1990); Lovelock (1980); Lovelock (1983); Liu et al. (2008); Shafti et al. (2007); Cunningham et al. (2005); Van der Valk and Axelsson (2015); Ostrom and Iacobucci (1995); Karmarkar (2004); Lovelock (1984); Dotchin and Oakland (1994); Verma (2000); Trinh and Kachitvichyanukul (2013)
Degree of customer contactLevel of customer’s presence in the service process.YesSalegna and Fazel (2013); Cunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Silvestro et al. (1992); Bowen (1990); Shafti et al. (2007); Cunningham et al. (2005); Chase (2010); Van der Valk and Axelsson (2015); Lovelock (1984); Dotchin and Oakland (1994); Verma (2000)
Tangibility/IntangibilityLevel of physical features in the service.N/ASalegna and Fazel (2013); Cunningham et al. (2004); Cunningham et al. (2006); Bowen (1990); Lovelock (1980); Lovelock (1983); Shafti et al. (2007); Cunningham et al. (2005); Parasuraman et al. (1985); Lovelock and Gummesson (2004); Parasuraman (1998); Judd (1964); Lovelock (1984); Grönroos (1983); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011); Kotler and Armstrong (2010); Dotchin and Oakland (1994); Dey et al. (2015)
Relationship or interpersonal interactionType of relation between the customers and the service provider (formal or no formal).YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Lovelock (1983); Liu et al. (2008); Shafti et al. (2007); Cunningham et al. (2005); Solomon, et al. (1985); Lovelock and Wirtz (2011); Dotchin and Oakland (1994)
Nature of service delivery (continuous or discrete transactions)Level of service continuity between the customers and the service provider.N/ACunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Silvestro et al. (1992); Bowen (1990); Lovelock (1980); Lovelock (1983); Cunningham et al. (2005); Lovelock (1984); Vandermerwe and Chadwick (1989); Lovelock and Wirtz (2011)
RiskinessLevel of risk that customers perceive across different types of services.YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Cunningham et al. (2005); Murphy and Enis (1986); Zeithaml (1981)
Judgement/DecisionLevel of judgement exercised by the contact personnel about customers and the nature of necessary information for accomplishment of a task by the employee.YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Lovelock (1983); Shafti et al. (2007); Cunningham et al. (2005); Mills and Margulies (1980)
SwitchingLevel of easiness of customers to change the service provider.YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Bowen (1990); Cunningham et al. (2005); Lovelock (1984)
EffortLevel of energy and value that customers spend in achieving the service.NoMurphy and Enis (1986)
Consumer involvement or customer participationLevel of customers’ contribution to the service process.YesBowen (1990); Van der Valk and Axelsson (2015); Larsson and Bowen (1989); Karmarkar and Pitbladdo (1995); Trinh and Kachitvichyanukul (2013); Dey et al.(2015)
Place orientation or value added back office/front officeThe places that the service process use.N/ASilvestro et al. (1992); Liu et al. (2008); Shafti et al. (2007)
Degree of labour intensityLevel of resources offered by the provider to accomplish the service process.YesLiu et al. (2008); Shafti et al. (2007); Dotchin and Oakland (1994); Verma (2000)
Extent of demand/supply imbalances or variety of customer demandsLevel of demand fluctuations over time.NoLovelock (1980); Lovelock (1983); Lovelock (1984)
Diversity of demandLevel of uniqueness of customers’ demands.YesLarsson and Bowen (1989)
Physical environment or physical goods and facilitiesGeneral, functional, and environment characteristics of the service provider.YesLin et al. (2013); Lovelock (1980)
Product/process focusThe type of emphasis of the service provider can be on the product or on the service process.N/ASilvestro et al. (1992); Shafti et al. (2007); Grönroos (1983)
Personal quality of an employee: behaviour/contact person/friendlinessThe behaviour characteristics of the contact personnelYesLin et al. (2013); Crosby and Stephens (1987); Ostrom and Iacobucci (1995); Jankalová (2016)
Value (pricing and timing)The price paid for the service and the time spent for acquiring or consuming the service.NoLin et al. (2013)
Service delivery (collective and individual)Customers can share time, space, or equipment when consuming the service.N/ANg et al. (2007); Lovelock (1980); Hill (1977); Lovelock (1984)
Customer’s service encounter activity sequenceThe steps that form the service encounter.YesCollier and Meyer (1998)
Number of pathways built into the service system design by managementThe steps that form the service encounter defined by the service provider.YesCollier and Meyer (1998)
Communication/Communication timeAll the forms of communication made between the service provider and the customers.YesKellogg and Chase (1995); Parasuraman et al. (1985); Mills and Margulies (1980); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011)
Intimacy/AttachmentThe level of confidence and trust between the service provider and the customers, and employee’s identification with customersYesKellogg and Chase (1995); Mills and Margulies (1980)
Information (richness or asymmetry)The level of information exchange between the service provider and the customers.YesKellogg and Chase (1995); Mills and Margulies (1980); Krishnan and Hartline (2001); Zeithaml (1981)
Differentiation or divergenceThe definition of the service mix in order to distinguish it from competitors.YesBowen (1990); Shostack (1987)
Importance of people/employeesThe level of significance that service provider employees have in the service process.YesBowen (1990); Lovelock (1984)
Multi-site vs. single-site deliveryThe location of the service delivery.N/ALovelock (1980); Lovelock (1984)
Breadth of service packageThe number of services that compose the whole service.YesLovelock (1980)
Timing and duration of benefits; permanent effect vs. temporary effectThe duration of the benefits received when acquiring the service.N/ALovelock (1980); Hill (1977)
Allocation of capacity to customersThe management of service capacity by the service provider according to demand fluctuations.YesLovelock (1980)
Time-defined vs. task-defined transactionsThe definition of the service according to the duration or to the accomplishment of a task.N/ALovelock (1980)
Nature of customer/service system interactionThe level of customer interaction in the service system.YesWemmerlöv (1990)
Nature of service (customer–provider interaction)The effort of acquiring the service can be from customers or from the service provider.N/ALovelock (1980); Vandermerwe and Chadwick (1989)
Method of service delivery (nature of interaction and availability)The way that the service is delivered according to its availability.YesLovelock (1983)
Purpose of delivery/consumptionThe core benefit that customers search from acquiring a service.NoNg et al. (2007); Parasuraman (1998)
ReliabilityThe ability of the service provider to perform the service as promised, right at the first time.YesParasuraman et al. (1985); Jankalová (2016)
Security/RiskinessThe level of physical safety, financial security and confidentiality that customers perceive across different types of services.YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Cunningham et al. (2005); Murphy and Enis (1986); Zeithaml (1981); Parasuraman et al. (1985); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011)
CredibilityThe level of trust, believability and honesty of the service provider perceived by customers.YesParasuraman et al. (1985)
Speed or responsivenessThe level of employees’ determination to offer a service.YesParasuraman et al. (1985); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011)
Understanding/knowing the customerThe level of knowledge that the service provider has about customers.YesParasuraman et al. (1985)
Courtesy or empathyThe personnel of contact professionalism, respect, education, consideration, friendliness and polite appearance.YesParasuraman et al. (1985); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff, (2011)
Access/ConvenienceThe easiness of contact and level of availability that customers require to the service provider.YesCunningham et al. (2006); Cunningham et al. (2004); Cunningham et al. (2005); Venkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011); Jankalová (2016); Parasuraman et al. (1985)
CompetenceThe service provider skills, competences and knowledge to provide the service.YesParasuraman et al. (1985)
Complexity/Degree of specifyingThe number and difficulty of service performance steps definition.YesShostack (1987); Karmarkar (2004)
Role similarityThe roles of each service provider.N/ASolomon et al. (1985)
Tie strength with a clientThe power of the interaction between the service provider and the customers.YesSmedlund (2008)
Service scope (degree of bundling)Combinations of individual services into one integrated service.YesKowalkowski et al. (2009)
Service focus (level of customer integration)The type of focus of the service regarding the level of customers’ integration.YesKowalkowski et al. (2009); Fitzsimmons et al. (1998)
Service processThe structure of the service offers regarding service scope and focus.YesKowalkowski et al. (2009); Lovelock and Yip (1996)
Service coreThe essential aspects of the service.YesCrosby and Stephens (1987); Iacobucci and Ostrom (1993)
Overall satisfactionThe customer’s evaluation of satisfaction with the service.NoCrosby and Stephens (1987)
HeterogeneityThe service is not uniform, it is always performed differently.YesLovelock and Gummesson (2004); Kotler and Armstrong (2010)
PerishabilityService’s inability to be saved, stored or reused.N/ALovelock and Gummesson (2004); Kotler and Armstrong (2010)
PriceCustomers can be price sensitive, depending on the purchase situation.YesOstrom and Iacobucci (1995)
Degree of routinisation of the service processThe level of technology used on service process to make it more predictable.YesWemmerlöv (1990)
Serviced objects in service processThe service can be processed on goods, people or information/images.N/AWemmerlöv (1990); Dotchin and Oakland (1994)
Degree of consumer internal research or Problem awarenessThe customers’ knowledge about a service.NoDavis et al. (1979); Mills and Margulies (1980)
TransferabilityThe easiness of replacing employees in the service workflow.N/AMills and Margulies (1980)
PowerThe control of critical information by the service provider.YesMills and Margulies (1980)
Physical effect vs. mental effectServices can make changes on either the physical or mental conditions of the customers.N/AHill (1977)
Inventories absentThe lack of inventory in services as a result of intangibility.N/AKarmarkar and Pitbladdo (1995)
Extent to which customer needs to be physically presentServices that involve the customers in its processing.YesLovelock and Yip (1996)
UsefulnessCustomer’s evaluation of the utility of the service.NoVenkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011)
Knowledge of service providersThe level of information that service providers have about customer’s needs.YesVenkateswaran and Maleyeff (2011)
Ease of service generationThe number of skills required to generate the service.N/AChakraborty and Kaynak (2014)
Value of serviceWhat the customers spend in a service encounter.NoChakraborty and Kaynak (2014)
Type of userThe type of customer can be individual or organisational.N/ADey et al. (2015)
Environmental orientationThe green attributes and practices that care for environment protection.YesChen et al. (2015)
EcologicEco-friendly practices, activities, and education.YesBan and Ramsaran (2017)
Environmentally friendly and healthy equipmentThe use of natural and ecofriendly materials in the service process.YesBastič and Gojčič (2012)
Eco-behaviour of hotel staffEmployee’s environmentally conscious attitude.YesBastič and Gojčič (2012)
Efficient use of energy and waterThe implementation of actions to reduce water and energy consumption.YesBastič and Gojčič (2012)

Consistency and reliability analysis of the dimension degree of customer involvement (DCI)_

VariableKMO testCronbach’s alpha (score reliability)ItemComponent 1Component 2AVECR
1.DCI_acq0.522
2.DCI_be0.706
3.DCI_stff0.762
4.DCI_prof0.765
Degree of customer involvement (DCI)0.8790.8195.DCI_lyt0.683 0.4800.820
6.DCI_mach0.349
7.DCI_cst0.696
8.DCI_pack0.650
9.DCI_ad0.728

Consistency and reliability analysis of the dimension convenience level (CL)_

VariableKMO testCronbach’s alpha (score reliability)ItemComponent 1Component 2AVECR
10.CL_24h0.6150.340
11.CL_prb0.7580.321
12.CL_eqp0.7390.397
13.CL_cent0.3180.620
14.CL_rom0.8130.356
Convenience level (CL)0.9550.94715.CL_hom0.3600.6960.6690.948
16.CL_dsg0.1050.859
17.CL_pro0.8330.303
18.CL_cnf0.8550.201
19.CL_sec0.8650.256
20.CL_sub0.8400.230
21.CL_pri0.8010.178

Variables included in the questionnaire_

Main dimensions (variables)Authors
Degree of customer involvement (DCI)Adapted from Kalamas et al. (2002); Ariffin and Maghzi (2012); and own Elaboration
Convenience level (CL)Adapted from Lee et al. (2016); Ladhari (2012); Rachau et al. (2015); Ayeh and Chen (2013); Ariffin and Maghzi (2012); Manhas and Tukamushaba (2015); Dortyol et al. (2014); and own elaboration
Contact personnel performance (CPP)Adapted from Ariffin and Maghzi (2012); Lee et al. (2016); Asad and Tim (2010); Blešić et al. (2014)
Complexity degree (CD)Adapted from Dortyol et al. (2014); Asad and Tim (2010); and own elaboration
Information and communication power (ICP)Adapted from Chen (2014); Ayeh and Chen (2013); Ladhari (2012); and own elaboration
Environment and social responsibility (ESR)Adapted from Bastič and Gojčič (2012) and own elaboration

Socio-demographic profile and moderating variables by country of residence_

PTESFRITROBRMXUYBOCLNLENELNENLTotal
Age
18 to 2559%14%27%12%32%16%25%22%48%17%25%0%0%29%
26 to 4031%32%36%40%46%41%31%32%33%37%63%29%50%36%
41 to 6011%50%30%44%22%38%39%44%15%35%13%42%50%31%
Above 600%4%7%4%0%4%6%2%4%11%0%29%0%4%
Sex
Female26%36%29%22%50%42%33%47%43%30%63%46%17%43%
Male74%64%71%78%50%58%67%53%57%70%38%54%83%57%
Education qualification
Primary1%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
Secondary22%3%0%1%3%1%0%4%18%4%0%4%0%7%
Bachelor’s36%13%6%36%24%17%35%40%48%23%13%29%0%28%
Master’s/PhD42%84%94%62%73%82%65%56%35%73%88%67%100%65%
Annual household income (in relation to country’s average)
Far below3%3%4%1%1%1%0%0%1%1%0%0%0%2%
Below17%10%9%1%3%3%2%2%12%0%0%0%0%7%
Average42%38%27%55%25%21%26%29%38%19%50%29%33%32%
Above36%42%48%42%48%45%57%62%39%53%38%46%33%46%
Well above3%7%12%1%23%30%15%7%11%28%13%25%33%14%
Work in the tourism/travel industry
Yes6%9%1%3%1%1%3%0%8%4%13%4%0%4%
No94%91%99%97%99%99%97%100%92%96%87%96%100%96%
Frequency of hotel stay
I do not stay in hotels13%4%4%3%2%3%3%3%14%8%0%0%0%6%
Once per year39%13%15%12%8%16%19%30%32%25%37%13%50%22%
2 to 3 times per year32%30%32%31%45%38%36%33%36%32%25%29%50%35%
More than 3 times per year16%53%49%54%45%43%42%34%18%35%38%58%037%
Hotel category type
I do not stay in hotels13%4%6%3%4%4%3%3%15%9%0%0%0%6%
1 star2%0%6%0%0%0%0%2%2%0%0%0%0%1%
2 stars4%2%14%4%4%4%1%0%7%1%0%0%0%4%
3 stars38%23%50%52%59%46%15%38%38%32%62%33%83%38%
4 stars41%68%20%41%32%41%47%54%27%44%38%54%17%42%
5 stars2%3%4%0%1%5%34%3%11%14%0%13%0%9%

Consistency and reliability analysis of the dimension contact personnel performance (CPP)_

VariableKMO testCronbach’s alpha (score reliability)ItemComponent 1Component 2AVECR
22.CPP_frd0.463
23.CPP_knw0.867
24.CPP_spc0.834
Contact personnel performance (CPP)0.9020.94125.CPP_clm0.905 0.7330.943
26.CPP_prof0.898
27.CPP_edu0.891
28.CPP_hel0.881
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2024-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2182-4924 | Journal ISSN: 2182-4916
Language: English
Page range: 312 - 331
Submitted on: Feb 22, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 28, 2024
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Mara Franco, Raquel Meneses, published by Polytechnic Institute of Leiria
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.