Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Research on Rural Environmental Pollution Control Path Under Administrative Intervention Mechanism Cover

Research on Rural Environmental Pollution Control Path Under Administrative Intervention Mechanism

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)
By: Lei Wu and  Chengsi Wang  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. [1] Ahmad D, Afzal M. Flood hazards, human displacement and food insecurity in rural riverine areas of Punjab, Pakistan: policy implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(8):10125-39. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11430-7.33164109
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Xu X. Mechanism and test of the impact of lack of human capital on ecological development in innovation sector. Math Probl Eng. 2021;(8):1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6665251.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Ukpong I, Inyeinyang M, Ominikari G. Socioeconomic disparity and poverty profiles in oil producing rural areas in Nigeria. J Asian Rural Stud. 2019;3(2):145. DOI: 10.20956/JARS.V3I2.1905.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Li C, Sun G, Wu Z, Zhong H, Wang R, Liu X. Soil physiochemical properties and landscape patterns control trace metal contamination at the urban-rural interface in southern China. Environ Pollut. 2019:537-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.065.31026701
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Wang T, Wang Q, Zhang C. Research on the optimal operation of a novel renewable multi-energy complementary system in rural areas. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):2196. DOI: 10.3390/su13042196.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Kim S, Uhm JY. Individual and environmental factors associated with proteinuria in Korean children: a multilevel analysis. Int J Env Res Pub Health. 2019;16(18):3317. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183317.676605231505832
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Nicewicz Ł, Nicewicz AW, Kafel A, Nakonieczny M. Set of stress biomarkers as a practical tool in the assessment of multistress effect using honeybees from urban and rural areas as a model organism: a pilot study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(8):9084-96. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11338-2.788436033128148
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Marszałek M, Kowalski Z, Makara A. The possibility of contamination of water-soil environment as a result of the use of pig slurry. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(2):313-30. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0022.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Niu L, Xu C, Zhou Y, Liu W. Tree bark as a biomonitor for assessing the atmospheric pollution and associated human inhalation exposure risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rural china. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:398-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.019.30577008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Feng W, Wang C, Lei X, Wang H, Zhang X. Distribution of nitrate content in groundwater and evaluation of potential health risks: a case study of rural areas in northern China. Int J Env Res Pub Health. 2020;17(24):9390. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249390.776540733333936
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Zhang X, Zang C, Ma H, Wang Z. Study on removing calcium carbonate plug from near wellbore by high-power ultrasonic treatment. Ultrason Sonochem. 2020:104515. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.03.006.31753547
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Kulin J, Sev I. The role of government in protecting the environment: Quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences. Int J Comp Sociol. 2019;49(2):110-29. DOI: 10.1080/00207659.2019.1582964.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Li J, Ye Z, Shuang Z. Economy, environment and government: study on the path of supply-side reform forced by the fog-haze. J App Mat Phys. 2019;7(2):281-97. DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2019.72023.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Pillay YP, Buschke FT. Misaligned environmental governance indicators and the mismatch between government actions and positive environmental outcomes - science direct. Environ Sci Policy. 2020;112:374-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Setiawan E, Hana S, Susanto A. The effect of compensation and work environment on non-asn employee performance at Jember government: the path role of job satisfaction. Int J Sci Res Manage. 2020;8(6):1854-62. DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v8i06.em05.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Pamalis R, Larasati E, Susanta H. Determinants of the policy implementation of guidelines public complaints management in Tegal Regency government environment. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik. 2021;11(1):223-9. DOI: 10.26858/jiap.v11i1.21669.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Shen M, Zhang Y, Xu H, Ma H. MOFs based on the application and challenges of perovskite solar cells. iScience. 2021;24(9):103069. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103069.844909134568791
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Zhong Z, Zhang X, Yang X. Benefit evaluation of energy-saving and emission reduction in construction industry based on rough set theory. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(1):61-73. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0006.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Shuai G, Li Z, Zhang D, Elhefnawey M, Li L. On rough set theory on achieving high quality cable material production by green low carbon technology. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(1):49-59. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0005.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Dyadik N, Chapargina A. Business and government: environmental and economic responsibility in the Russian Arctic. 2020;41(41):38-61. Available from: https://www.sciencegate.app/document/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.38.10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.38
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Alhassan DA, Uba AI, Muhammad AU, Muhammad YY. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of crude stem bark extracts of Anogeissus leiocarpus. Eur J Med Plants. 2016;11(2):1-7. DOI: 10.9734/EJMP/2016/22443.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Lin X, Pang H, Wei D, Lu M, Liao B. Effect of the cross-linker structure of cross-linked polycarboxylate superplasticizers on the behavior of cementitious mixtures. Colloid Surf A. 2020;608:125437. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125437.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Wang X, Yu R, Shui Z, Song Q, Zhang Z. Mix design and characteristics evaluation of an eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete incorporating recycled coral based materials. J Clean Prod. 2017;165:70-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.096.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: A review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004;24(1):89-124. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2022-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 402
Published on: Oct 17, 2022
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
ecological environment,
conservation perspective,
low carbon financial support,
environment,
Zhejiang Province
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2022 Lei Wu, Chengsi Wang, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 29 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)Next article