Economic Development Model and Effective Path of Green Industry

Wen Tian; Xin Zhang

doi:10.2478/eces-2022-0029

Abstract

Major crises such as greenhouse effect and resource depletion remind people that environmental protection is imminent. However, the economic growth is always accompanied by the destruction of the environment, so the development of green industry economy is very necessary for the balance between the two. However, many of today’s green industry economic development is still in the theoretical stage, and there are no substantive measures. Therefore, this paper aims to build a reasonable development evaluation model for the green industry economy, and use the results of the model to explore the sustainable development of the green industry economy. In view of this, in the stage of proposing the model, this paper refers to a large number of literature and field investigation, and selects 30 suitable evaluation indexes. The experimental results of the green industrial economy in Sichuan Province with the designed model show that the comprehensive evaluation index of green economic development has increased steadily. It reached 0.8255 in 2016, which is in line with the actual situation. This shows that the model in this paper has a good fitting effect, and can provide guidance for the economic development model and effective path of green industry.

References

[1] Gasparatos A, Doll C, Esteban M, Olang TA, Ahmed A. Renewable energy and biodiversity: implications for transitioning to a green economy. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2017;70:161-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Mazzanti M, Rizzo U. Diversely moving towards a green economy: Techno-organisational decarbonisation trajectories and environmental policy in EU sectors. Technological Forecasting Social Change. 2017;115:111-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.026.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Pan SY, Gao M, Kim H, Chiang PC, Pei SL, Shah KJ. Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: barriers and strategies. Renew Energy. 2019;132:19-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.126.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Glazyrina IP, Zabelina IA. Spatial heterogeneity of Russia in the light of the concept of a green economy: the social context. Geography Natural Resources. 2018;39(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372818020026.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Caprotti F. Protecting innovative niches in the green economy: investigating the rise and fall of Solyndra, 2005-2011. GeoJournal. 2017;82(5):937-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-016-9722-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Antonioli D, Mazzanti M. Towards a green economy through innovations: the role of trade union involvement. Ecol Economics. 2017;131:286-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Buseth JT. The green economy in Tanzania: from global discourses to institutionalization. Geoforum. 2017;86:42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Adams WM. Sleeping with the enemy? Biodiversity conservation, corporations and the green economy. J Political Ecol. 2017;24(1):243-57. DOI: 10.2458/v24i1.20804.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Abdullah H, Bakar NA, Jali MR, Ibrahim FW. The current state of Malaysia’s journey towards a green economy: the perceptions of the companies on environmental efficiency and sustainability. Int J Energy Economics Policy. 2017;7(1):253-8. Available from: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/3707.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Kasztelan A. Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: terminological and relational discourse. Prague Economic Papers. 2017;26(4):487-99. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.626.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Mendoza M. Post-neoliberal labor in Patagonia: informality and citizenship in the green economy. Dialectical Anthropol. 2017;41:55-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10624-017-9446-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Bobby MN, Indira M, Peele KA. Venkateswrulu TC, Krupanidhi S. Sustainable nutritional supplementation for green economy through hydroponics system. Indian J Ecol. 2021;48(1):85-90. Available from: https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/7384453
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Tousi SN, Malekkhani A. Measurement framework for assessing Iran’s provincial state in terms of green economy concept. J Environ Studies. 2021;44(4):661-88. DOI: 10.22059/JES.2019.252330.1007599.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Ovcharenko R, Goncharova O, Kondratenko E, Maltseva O. State policy in the field of formation of “green economy” in Russia. Amazonia Investiga. 2021;10(42):141-8. DOI: 10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.13.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Tu TTT, Yen TTH. Green bank: international experiences and Vietnam perspectives. Asian Social Sci. 2015;11(28):188-99. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v11n28p188.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Ali AHS. Societal green economy and its impact on sustainable development. Int J Sust Development Planning. 2021;16(1):105-14. DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.160111.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Vishnevsky VP, Harkushenko OM, Zanizdra MY, Kniaziev SI. Digital and green economy: common grounds and contradictions. Sci Innovation. 2021;17(3):14-27. DOI: 10.15407/scine17.03.014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Yumei H, Iqbal W, Irfan M, Fatima A. The dynamics of public spending on sustainable green economy: role of technological innovation and industrial structure effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;29(16):22970-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17407-4.34797541
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Huang S, Ma S, Pan Y, Li Y, Yuan Y, Tsai S. An empirical study on how climate and environmental issues awareness affects low carbon use behaviour. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2020;27(1):55-66. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2020-0003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Wu C. An empirical study on discussion and evaluation of green university. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(1):75-85. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Economic Development Model and Effective Path of Green Industry

Abstract

Paradigm

My account