Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“I believe in video!” An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Video as an Educational Resource Cover

“I believe in video!” An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Video as an Educational Resource

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Algurén, B. (2021). How to bring about change – A literature review about education and learning activities for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-000210.2478/dcse-2021-0002
  2. Almasseri, M., & AlHojailan, M. I. (2019). How flipped learning based on the cognitive theory of multimedia learning affects students’ academic achievements [Article]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.1238610.1111/jcal.12386
  3. Altomonte, S., Logan, B., Feisst, M., Rutherford, P., & Wilson, R. (2016). Interactive and situated learning in education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2015-000310.1108/IJSHE-01-2015-0003
  4. Anderson, C. (2019). [Podcast]. In Sir Ken Robinson (still) wants an educational revolution. https://www.ted.com/talks/the_ted_interview_sir_ken_robinson_still_wants_an_education_revolution/transcript#t-2306919
  5. Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of elearning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791090284597210.1080/01587910902845972
  6. Blikstad-Balas, M., Kornhall, P., & Nilsson, J. M. (2020). Det store digitaliseringseksperimentet i skolen [The great digitization experiment in schools] (1. utgave. ed.). Fagbokforlaget.
  7. Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10 (Jubileumsnummer), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-0310.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
  8. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes [Article]. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.96582310.1080/00461520.2014.965823
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches fourth edition. SAGE Publications.
  10. Dowling, M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches [Article]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.02610.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
  11. Evans, H. K., & Cordova, V. (2015). Lecture videos in online courses: A follow-up. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.106919810.1080/15512169.2015.1069198
  12. Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=3114740
  13. Finlay, L. (2014). Engaging phenomenological analysis [Article]. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.80789910.1080/14780887.2013.807899
  14. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology – Integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
  15. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT – Replacement, amplification, and transformation – Framework. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
  16. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). How do we interact with the world in creating our lived experiences and maintaining the vitality of the world? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-001210.2478/jtes-2021-0012
  17. Jeong, H., & Othman, J. (2016). Using interpretative phenomenological analysis from a realist perspective. The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 558–570.10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2300
  18. Jung, S., Son, M., Kim, C.-i., Rew, J., & Hwang, E. (2019). Video-based learning assistant scheme for sustainable education [Article]. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia, 25(3), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2019.167868210.1080/13614568.2019.1678682
  19. Kelentri„, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A.-T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in education, 1–74.
  20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge Uiversity Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  21. León, B., & Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating science and technology through online video: Researching a new media phenomenon. Routledge.10.4324/9781351054584
  22. Liu, Z.-J., Tretyakova, N., Fedorov, V., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for new learning models development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(14), 4–18.10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669
  23. Lovdata. (1998). Act relating to primary and secondary education and training (the education act). https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1998-07-17-61
  24. Normann, A. (2017). Becoming a phenomenologically skilled researcher – An account of a journey started. Reflective Practice, 18(5), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.130772010.1080/14623943.2017.1307720
  25. Normann, A. (2021). Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis. Lecture at PLU8021 NTNU.
  26. OED. (28th of April 2022). Comprehension. Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com/word/comprehension
  27. Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204.10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
  28. Qvortrup, A., & Wiberg, M. (2013). Læringsteori og didaktik. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  29. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., & Fico, F. (2019). Analyzing media messages. Analyzing media messages. Routledge.10.4324/9780429464287
  30. Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL) – Past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019 [Article]. Technology, Knowledge & Learning, 26(4), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-510.1007/s10758-020-09455-5
  31. Scagnoli, N. I., Choo, J., & Tian, J. (2019). Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.1257210.1111/bjet.12572
  32. Shi, Y., Hong, D., Cai, Y., Shao, P., & Hughes, J. E. (2019). Teaching educational technology: An analysis of course syllabi from teacher education programs. In Annual Proceedings.
  33. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
  34. Spiers, J., & Riley, R. (2019). Analysing one dataset with two qualitative methods: The distress of general practitioners, a thematic and interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.154309910.1080/14780887.2018.1543099
  35. Tallman, T. O. (2019). How middle grades teachers experience a collaborative culture: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 42(8), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.166810310.1080/19404476.2019.1668103
  36. UNESCO. (2014). Roadmap for implementing the global action programme on education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO publishing.
  37. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
  38. Utdanningsdirektoratet [Directorate of education]. (2021). Rammeverk for lærerens profesjonsfaglige digitale kompetanse (PfDK) [Framework for learners professional digital competence]. https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/profesjonsfaglig-digital-kompetanse/rammeverk-larerens-profesjonsfaglige-digitale-komp/innledning/#
  39. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  40. van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
  41. Wartenweiler, T. (2021). Teachers’ experiences of spirituality in Swiss secular high schools – an interpretative phenomenological analysis [Article]. Journal of Beliefs & Values: Studies in Religion & Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.198590110.1080/13617672.2021.1985901
  42. Yoon, M., Lee, J., & Jo, I. H. (2021). Video learning analytics: Investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning [Article]. Internet & Higher Education, 50, N.PAG-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.10080610.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100806
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 149
Published on: Nov 15, 2022
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Dag Øivind Østereng, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.