References
- Arsan, T., & Çölkesen, R. (2012). Algoritma ve akış şemaları [Algorithm and flowcharts], R. Çölkesen (Ed.). Bilgisayar mühendisliğine giriş temelleri [Introductory basics in computer engineering] (pp. 57–76). İstanbul, Papatya Publisher.
- Aydın-Aşk, Z. (2016). Matematik dersinde otantik görev odaklıöğrenme şüreçlerinin incelenmesi: bir eylem araştırması [The study of authentic task focused learning process in the maths course: An action research]. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüşü, Gaziantep.
- Balcı, A. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research in social sciences: Methods, techniques and principles]. Ankara, PegemA Publisher.
- Başer, M. (2013). Bilgisayar programlamaya karşı tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması.[Developing attitude scale toward computer programming]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(6), 199–215.10.9761/JASSS1702
- Büyüköztürk, S¸. (2016). Deneysel desenler (5. Baskı) [Experimental patterns]. Ankara, PegemA Publisher.
- Callison, D., & Lamb, A. (2004). Key words in instruction: Authentic learning. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21(2), 34–39.
- Caseley, P. M. (2004). Toward an authentic pedagogy: An investigation of authentic learning instruction in a middle school. Master Dissertation, Pacific Lutheran University.
- Çoban, S. (1999). Yöneticilerin yaratıcılık düzeyleri ile liderlik tarzları arasındaki ilişki [Relationship between creativity levels and leadership styles of managers]. Yayın-lanmamış doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüşü, İstanbul.
- Dennis, J., & O’Hair, M. J. (2010). Overcoming obstacles in using authentic instruction: A comparative case study of high school math and science tearchers. American Secondary Education, 38(2), 4–22.
- Garner, S. (2003, June). Learning resources and tools to aid novices learn programming. Paper presented at Proceedings of Informing Science & Information Technology Education Joint Conference, Pori, Finland. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.3.1909&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Gatlin, L., & Edwards, R. (2007). Promoting authentic learning through a peaceful and positive perspective. Journal of Authentic Learning, 4(1), 1–8.
- Giray, S. (2016). İki aşamalı kümeleme analizi ile hüküml¸ verilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of convict data by two stage cluster analysis]. Ekonometri ve İstatistik [Econometrics and statistics], 25, 1–31.
- Gleeson, A. M. (2011). Preparing teachers and students for semocracy: Teacher and student learning and authentic intellectual work. Doctoral Dissertation, Boston College, USA.
- Goold, A., & Rimmer, R. (2000). Indicators of performance in first-year computing. Paper presented at Computer Science Conference, 2000. ACSC 2000. 23rd Austral-asian (pp. 74–80). IEEE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3837359_Indicators_of_performance_in_first-year_computing
- Göçmen, G. B. (2004, Temmuz). Otantik değerlendirme nedir ve nasıl yapılır? [What is an authentic assessment and how is it done?] Paper presented at XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönö¸ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Malatya. https://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/410.pdf
- Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199–237.10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
- Gündoğan, A., & Gültekin, M. (2018). The reflection of the attitudes and learning processes to learning environments with authentic tasks in life science class. Pegem Eğitim ve ÷ğretim Dergisi [Pegem Journal of Education and Training ], 8(4), 771–832.10.14527/pegegog.2018.030
- Heasly, B., Lindner, J., Iliško, Dz., & Salīte, I. (2020). From initiatives, to insights, to implementation of the sustainability and securitability agenda for 2030. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 1–4.10.2478/dcse-2020-0001
- Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.10.1007/BF02319856
- Horzum, M. B., & Bektaş, M. (2012). Otantik öğrenmenin topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersini alan öğretmen adaylarının derse yönelik tutum ve memnuniyetine etkisi [The effect of authentic learning on preservice teachers’ attitude and satisfaction towards service learning]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(1), 341–360.
- Hussain, S., Ahmad, N., & Khan, F. N. (2015). The effects of authentic pedagogical practices on students’ educatinal performances and retention power. Pakistan Journal of Education, 30(2), 47–62.10.30971/pje.v30i2.89
- Iucu, R. B., & Marin, E. (2014). Authentic learning in adult education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 410–415.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.702
- Johnson, Y. L. (2007). The efficacy of authentic assessment versus pencil and paper testing in evaluating student achievement in a basic technology Course. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.
- Kinay, İ., & Bağçeci, B. (2015). Otantik değerlendirme sürecine katılan öğretmen a daylarıniı duyuşsal özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of emotional features of prospective teachers participated in the process of authentic assessment]. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama [Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice], 6(12), 67–80.
- Koçyiğit, S. (2011). Otantik görev odaklı yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına, derse karşı tutumlarına ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The effects of the authentic task based constructivist approach on preservice teachers? Achievement, attitudes towards classes and problem solving skills]. Yayiımlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüşü, İstanbul.
- Koçyiğit, S., & Zembat, R. (2013). Otantik görevlerin öğretmen adaylarının başarılarına etkisi [The effects of the authentic task on preservice teachers’ achievement]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 291–303.
- Mintah, J. K. (2009). Authentic assessment in physical education: Prevalence of use and perceived impact on students’ self-concept, motivation, and skill achievement. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(3), 161–174.10.1207/S15327841MPEE0703_03
- Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 1–17.
- Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280–312.10.1086/444136
- Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 50(7), 8–12.
- Niesz, T. M. (2003). The project approach to learning: How the project approach provides opportunities for authentic Learning. Master Dissertation, Pacific Lutheran University.
- Preus, B. (2012). Authentic instruction for 21st century learning: Higher order thinking in an inclusive school. American Secondary Education, 40(3), 59–79.
- Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N., & Martineau, J. A. (2011). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45.10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1
- Reed, L. (1993). Achieving the aims and purposes of schooling through authentic assessment. Middle School Journal, 25(2), 11–13.10.1080/00940771.1993.11495198
- Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2004). A time and a place for authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 73–77.
- Robinson, K. (2003). Yaratıcılık aklın sınırlarını aşmak [Creativity transcends the limits of the mind]. İstanbul, Kitap Publisher.
- Rule, A. (2006). The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.
- Šļahova, A., Volonte, I., & Čačka, M. (2017). Interrelations in the development of primary school learners’ creative imagination and creative activity when depicting a portrait in visual art lessons. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 102–120.10.1515/dcse-2017-0008
- Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2014). Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Genişletilmiş 3.Baskı) [Exemplified scientific research methods]. Ankara, Ani Publisher.
- Şahin, N., Şahin, N. H., & Heppner, P. P. (1993). The psychometric properties of the problem solving inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 379–396.10.1007/BF01177661
- Taranto, D., & Buchanan, M. T. (2020). Sustaining lifelong learning: A self-regulated learning (SRL) approach. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 5–15.10.2478/dcse-2020-0002
- Tillmanns, T., Holland, C., & Filho, A. S. (2017). Design criteria for visual cues used in disruptive learning interventions within sustainability education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 5–16.10.1515/dcse-2017-0011
- Uçar, N. (2008). Kümeleme analizi [Cluster analysis], Şeref Kalaycı (Ed.). Spss uygulamalıçok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques]. Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 350–369.
- Vatansever, F. (2007). Algoritma geliştirme ve programlamaya giriş [Introduction to algorithm development and programming]. Ankara, Seçkin Publisher.
- White, J. (2008). Sustainable pedagogy: A research narrative about performativity, teachers and possibility. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5(1), 1–14.
- Yaşar, E. (2012). Algortima ve programlama giriş [Algorithm and programming introduction]. Trabzon, Murathan Publisher.
- Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.10.1007/BF02297091