Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainable Learning Levels of High School Students Cover
By: Menekşe Eskici  
Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Alberici, A., & Di Rienzo, P. (2014). Learning to learn for the individual and society. Learning to Learn (pp. 103–120). UK: Routledge.
  2. Anyolo, E. O., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2018). Implementing education for sustainable development in Namibia: School teachers’ perceptions and teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 64–81.10.2478/jtes-2018-0004
  3. Artemeva, V. (2014). The future architects’ attitude towards innovations in the context of sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 5(1), 31–37.10.2478/dcse-2014-0003
  4. Balcı, A. (2010). Glossary of explanatory educational management terms. Ankara: Pegem Press.
  5. Baştürk, S. (2011). Negative reflections of preparation process to the university entrance exam on studentsí mathematics learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 69–79.
  6. Blewitt, J. (2004). Sustainability and lifelong learning. In J. Blewitt & C. Cullingford (Eds.). The sustainability curriculum: The challenge for higher education (pp. 24–42). Sterling, VA; Earthscan.
  7. Can, R., Türkyılmaz, M., & Karadeniz, A. (2010). Adolescent studentsí reading habits. Journal of Education Faculty of Ahi Evran University, 11(3), 1–21.
  8. Charungkaittikul, S., & Henschke, J. A. (2014). Strategies for developing a sustainable learning society: An analysis of lifelong learning in Thailand. International Review of Education, 60(4), 499–522.10.1007/s11159-014-9444-y
  9. Commission of the European Communities (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning. Brussels. Retrived from http://arhiv.acs.si/dokumenti/Memorandum_on_Lifelong_Learning.pdf 13.04.2018
  10. Çapri, B., & Sönmez, G. Y. (2013). Investigation of burnout scores of high school students according to socio-demographic variables, psychological symptoms and attachment styles. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 195–218.
  11. Çeçen, M. A. ve Deniz, E. (2015). High school studentsí attitudes towards reading: The case of Diyarbakır. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(30), 193–312.
  12. Dash, G., & Mohan, A. K. (2017). Education for sustainability: perception of teachers and practices in urban primary schools of Mysore. Gyanodaya: The Journal of Progressive Education, 10(2), 9–17.10.5958/2229-4422.2017.00010.X
  13. Deniz, L., & Karbeyaz, A. (2018). School burnout in vocational-technical high school students. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(4), 735–755. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/trkefd/issue/39371/340592
  14. Doğan, S., Kırvak, E., & Baran, Ş. (2004). The levels of secondary school students making connection between daily life and the knowledge gained during biology lectures. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(1), 57–63.
  15. Engin, M., Kör, H., & Erbay, H. (2017). Turkish adaptation study of lifelong learning scale. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(4), 1561–1572.
  16. Eskici, M., & Ilgaz, G. (2019). High school students and mathematics in the light of attitude, success and gender. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 7(1), 335–345. doi: 10.18506/anemon.42216110.18506/anemon.422161
  17. Franzenburg, G. (2017). Learning from the past for the future: How to make adult education sustainable. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 57–65.10.1515/dcse-2017-0015
  18. Göçmençelebi, Ş.İ., & Özkan, M. (2011). Does the use of technology and reading scientific publications affect the ability to relate science lesson knowledge to daily life a comparative study of turkish primary school student. Journal of Uludag University of Faculty of Education, 24(1), 287–296.
  19. Gregor, A. (2005). Examination anxiety: Live with it, control it or make it work for you?. School Psychology International, 26(5), 617–635.10.1177/0143034305060802
  20. Gündüz, Z. B., & Özyürek, A. (2018). The relationship between school burnout level and parents attitudes of high school students. Elementary Education Online, 17(1), 384–395. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.41378610.17051/ilkonline.2018.413786
  21. Gürel, Z., Güven, İ., & Gürdal, A. (2003). Evaluation of skills of high school students in interpreting daily life events in lighth of the knowledge they learn in their physics lessons. Journal of Educational Sciences, 18, 65–78.
  22. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003), The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Retrieved from http://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/.pdf
  23. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational administration quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.10.1177/0013161X05277975
  25. Hipp, K. K., Huffman, J. B., Pankake, A. M., & Olivier, D. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of educational change, 9(2), 173–195.10.1007/s10833-007-9060-8
  26. Iliško, Dz. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–27.10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9
  27. Ipiranga, A. S. R., & Aguiar, M. M. S. (2014). Life, work and sustainable learning practices: a study on a small business network. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 11(2), 145–163.10.1590/S1807-76922014000200003
  28. Kabadayı, A. (2016). A suggested in-service training model based on Turkish preschool teachersí conceptions for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 5–15.10.1515/jtes-2016-0001
  29. Kumandaş, H., & Kutlu, Ö. (2014). The risk factors caused by exams used for student selection and placement into higher education on the academic performance. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 29(74), 15–31.
  30. Kutsal, D., & Bilge, F. (2012). A Study on the burnout and social support levels of high school students. Education and Science, 37(164), 283–297.
  31. Lambeir, B. (2005). Education as liberation: The politics and techniques of lifelong learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(3), 350.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00125.x
  32. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
  33. Mau, W. C., & Lynn, R. (2000). Gender differences in homework and test scores in mathematics, reading and science at tenth and twelfth grade. Psychology, Evolution& Gender, 2(2), 119–125.10.1080/14616660050200904
  34. McCombs, B. L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 117–127.10.1207/s15326985ep2602_4
  35. Mullins, S. B. (2018). Establishing a community of discourse through social norms. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(1), 5–17.10.2478/dcse-2018-0001
  36. Pahad, A. (2012). Role of universities in life long learning for elderly people. Asian Journal of Home Science, 7(2), 600–604.
  37. Palma, L. C., & Pedrozo, E. Á. (2015). Complex matrix for the analysis of sustainable transformative learning: an assessment methodology of sustainability integration in universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(6), 817–832.10.1080/02602938.2015.1040371
  38. Palmberg, I., Hofman-Bergholm, M., Jeronen, E., & Yli-Panula, E. (2017). Systems thinking for understanding sustainability? Nordic student teachers’ views on the relationship between species identification, biodiversity and sustainable development. Education Sciences, 7(3), 72.10.3390/educsci7030072
  39. Pepper, C., & Wildy, H. (2008). Leading for sustainability: is surface understanding enough?. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(5), 613–629.10.1108/09578230810895528
  40. Raji, M., & Zualkernan, I. (2016). A decision tool for selecting a sustainable learning technology intervention. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 306.
  41. Reid, E., & Horváthová, B. (2016). Teacher training programs for gifted education with focus on sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 66–74.10.1515/jtes-2016-0015
  42. Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397
  43. Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6
  44. Strachan, G. (2018). Can education for sustainable development change entrepreneurship education to deliver a sustainable future? Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(1), 36–49.10.2478/dcse-2018-0003
  45. Taşkesenlioğlu, L. (2013). A study about the reading habit of secondary school students. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 261–273.
  46. Temizyürek, F., Çolakoğlu, B. K., & Çoşkun, S. (2013). Investigation of reading habits of the ninth grade students according to some variables. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 11(2), 114–150.
  47. Tractenberg, R. E., FitzGerald, K.T., & Collmann, J. (2017). Evidence of sustainable learning from the mastery rubric for ethical reasoning. Education Sciences, 7(2), 1–23. doi: 10.3390/educsci7010002 http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/210.3390/educsci7010002http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/2
  48. Üstten, A. U., & Pilav, S. (2014). A research on high school students’ reading interests and habits. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(4), 764–782.
  49. Wals, A. E., & Jickling, B. (2002). Sustainability in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 221–232.10.1108/14676370210434688
  50. Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56.10.1108/14676370310455332
  51. Yeni Palabiyik, P. (2014). A study of Turkish high school students’ burnout and proficiency levels in relation to their sex. Novitas-ROYAL. Research on Youth and Language, 8(2), 169–177.
  52. Yenilmez, K., & Özabacı., Ş. N. (2003). An investigation on the relationship between mathematics and attitudes of mathematics on the level of maternity students. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, (14), 132–146.
  53. Yeşilyurt, S. (2006). A study on high school students’ attitudes towards biology assignments. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(1), 37–53.
  54. Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(3), 299–313.10.1080/0142569960170304
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 80
Published on: Jun 13, 2019
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Menekşe Eskici, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.