Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of Creativity Following Educational Intervention with Secondary School Students Cover

Analysis of Creativity Following Educational Intervention with Secondary School Students

Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Aceituno-Ramos, A.H. (2020). Incidencia de la mayéutica en la pedagogía constructivista. Revista Ciencia Multidisciplinaria Cunori, 4(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.36314/cunori.v4i2.14
  2. Albar, S.B., & Southcott, J.E. (2021). Problem and project-based learning through an investigation lesson: Significant gains in creative thinking behaviour within the Australian foundation (preparatory) classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100853
  3. Amabile, T. (2012). Componential theory of creativity. 12-096, Harvard Business School. http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/12-096.pdf
  4. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  5. Amabile, T.M., & Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  6. Amineh, R.J., & Asl, H.D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:27273145
  7. Anandarasu, R., & Vaiyadurai, A. (2018). Multiple Intelligence profile of secondary school students in relation to their academic performance. International Journal of Pedagogical Studies (IJPS), 6(1), 33–44. http://agmcoe.ac.in/Document/ijps2018issue.pdf#page=40
  8. Anastasiades, P. (2017). ICT and collaborative creativity in modern school towards knowledge society. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-learning and ICT in education: Technological, pedagogical and instructional perspectives (pp. 17–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34127-9
  9. Antoñanzas-Laborda, J.L., Toner-Pelay, M., Salavera-Bordás, C., Soler-Costa, R., & Usan-Supervia, P. (2015). Creatividad y aprendizaje en niños de 4 y 5 años. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 10(1), 139–152. http://www.revistadepsicologiayeducacion.es/pdf/121.pdf
  10. Beghetto, R., & Kaufman, J. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
  11. Bermejo, R., Ruiz, M.J., Ferrándiz, C., Soto, G., & Sainz, M. (2014). Pensamiento científico-creativo y rendimiento académico. Scientific creative thinking and academic achievement. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 1(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2014.1.1.24
  12. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  13. Cañal, P., Criado, A. M., García-Carmona, A., & Muñoz, G. (2013). La enseñanza relativa al medio en las aulas españolas de Educación Infantil y Primaria: Concepciones didácticas y práctica docente. Investigación en la Escuela, 81, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2013.i81.02
  14. Casado Fernández, R., & Checa-Romero, M. (2023). Creatividad, pensamiento crítico y trabajo en equipo en Educación Primaria: un enfoque interdisciplinar a través de proyectos STEAM. Revista complutense de educación, 34(3), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.79861
  15. Casado Fernández, R., & Checa-Romero, M. (2020). Robótica y Proyectos STEAM: Desarrollo de la creatividad en las aulas de Educación Primaria. Píxel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 58, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.73672
  16. Checa-Romero, M., & Pascual Gómez, I. (2018). Minecraft and machinima in action: Development of creativity in the classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1537933
  17. Clapham, M.M., & King, W.R. (2010). Psychometric characteristics of the CREA in an English speaking population. Annals of Psychology, 26(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
  18. Costa, A.L. (2006). Five themes in a thought-full curriculum. Thinking skills and creativity, 1(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2005.03.002
  19. Corbalaìn, J., & Limiñana, M. (2010). The genie in a bottle. The CREA test, questions and creativity. Annals of Psychology, 26(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
  20. Corbalaìn, J., Martínez, F., Donolo, D., Alonso, C., Tejerina, M., & Limiñana, M. (2015). CREA. Inteligencia Creativa. Una medida cognitiva de la creatividad. TEA Ediciones.
  21. Cotter, K.N., Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2022). Creativity in the Classroom: Advice for Best Practices. In T. Lubart, M. Botella, S. Bourgeois-Bougrine, X. Caroff, J. Guegan, C. Mouchiroud, J. Nelson & F. Zenasni (Eds.). Homo Creativus: The 7 C’s of Human Creativity (pp. 249–264). Springer.
  22. Cuetos Revuelta, M.J., Serrano Amarilla, N., & Yanes Gómez, A.M. (2024). Relación entre creatividad y rendimiento académico en alumnado entre 3.ş y 6.ş de educación primaria. Bordón. Revista De Pedagogía, 76(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2024.99876
  23. Fatimah, S. (2018). The effect of project-based science learning on PGSD students’ creative thinking ability. Journal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2), 100–105.
  24. Fitzgerald, M.S. (2020). Overlapping opportunities for social-emotional and literacy learning in elementary-grade project-based instruction. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1086/709545
  25. Gómez-Pérez, M.M., Mata-Sierra, S., García-Martín, M.B., Calero-García, M.D., Molinero-Caparrós, C., & Bonete-Román, S. (2014). Valoración de un programa de habilidades interpersonales en nińos superdotados. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0120-0534(14)70007-x
  26. Hawari, A.D.M., & Noor, A.I.M. (2020). Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072
  27. Hernández, A.F., López-Martínez, O., & Corbalán, F.J. (2020). Creative talent and personality: A primary education study. Sustainability, 12, 4203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104203
  28. Horkoff, J., Maiden, N., & Asboth, D. (2019). Creative goal modeling for innovative requirements. Information and Software Technology, 106, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.005
  29. Jakubakynov, B., Berechikidze, I., Kartashova, O., & Kochetkova, G. (2021). Gifted students creativity: The role of preliminary orientation and individual learning strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100883
  30. Johnsen, S.K. (2021). Definitions, models, and characteristics of gifted students. Identifying gifted students. Routledge.
  31. Jonassen, D. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: An iterative process. Educational technology. The magazine for managers of change in education, 48(3), 21–26. https://bit.ly/2XTjWbC
  32. Khanolainen, D., Semenova, E., & Magnuson, P. (2021). Teachers see nothing: exploring students’ and teachers’ perspectives on school bullying with a new arts-based methodology. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(3), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1751249
  33. Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9376-7
  34. Kolmos, A. & de Graaff, E. (2007). Process of Changing to PBL. In de Graaff, E. & Kolmos, A. (Eds.), Management of Change Implementation of Problem—Based Learning in Engineering (pp. 31–44). SENSE Publisher.
  35. Kordaki, M. (2011). A computer card game for the learning of basic aspects of the binary system in primary education: Design and pilot evaluation. Educ Inf Technol, 16, 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9136-6
  36. Kuo, H.C., Tseng, Y.C., & Yang, Y.T.C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.09.001
  37. Latada, F., & Kassim, H. (2017). Problem-oriented project -based learning (POPBL): An initiative to encourage soft skills expansion among students at a public university. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE), 1(3), 75–83. https://doi.org/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159192194.pdf
  38. Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., Du, X., & Thrane, M. (2008). Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ, 33, 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802088566
  39. Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L.M. (2015). The Art of Giving Online Feedback Concept of Feedback Purpose of Feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.
  40. Liu, Z., & Schonwetter, D.J. (2004). Teaching creativity in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(5), 801–808. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol20-5/IJEE1511.pdf
  41. López-Martínez, O., & Navarro-Lozano, J. (2008). Comparative study between creativity measures: TCTT versus CREA. Annals of Psychology, 24(1), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps
  42. Manchekar, S.D. (2015). Scientific Methods of Teaching History. Laxmi Book Publisher.
  43. Martínez-Aìlvarez, I., Llamas-Salguero, F., & López-Fernaìndez, V. (2020). Relacioìn entre aspectos neuropsicoloìgicos cognitivos y socioemocionales en alumnos de Educacioìn Primaria. Revista Fuentes, 22(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2020.v22.i2.08
  44. Mezcua-Hidalgo, A., Ruiz-Ariza, A., Ferreira BrandaÞo de Loureiro, V.A., & Martínez-López, E.J. (2019). Capacidades fiìsicas y su relacioìn con la memoria, caìlculo matemaìtico, razonamiento lingüístico y creatividad en adolescentes. Retos, 37, 473-479. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.71089
  45. Mora, C.E., Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Ańorbe Díaz, B., González-Marrero, A.M., & Arriola-Gutiérrez, E. (2015). Changing to PBL: the students’ perspective. In de Graaff, E., Guerra, A., Kolmos, A., Arexolaleiba, N.A. (Eds.), Global Research Community: Collaboration and Developments (pp. 504–516). Aalborg University Press.
  46. OECD (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume III). Creative Minds, Creative Schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
  47. Orozco Gómez, M.L., Toma, R.B., Cuesta Gómez, J.L., & Martínez, M.M. (2023). UBUIngenio: Extracurricular enrichment programme for the improvement of high ability students’ creative thinking. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 55, 212–218. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.23
  48. Porlán, R. (2018). Didáctica de las ciencias con conciencia. Enseńanza de las Ciencias, 36(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2795
  49. Reinking, A., & Martin, B. (2018). The gender gap in STEM fields: Theories, movements, and ideas to engage girls in STEM. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.271
  50. Robson, S. (2014). The analysing children’s creative thinking framework: development of an observation-led approach to identifying and analysing young children’s creative thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3033
  51. Saorín, J.L., Melian-Díaz, D., Bonnet, A., Carrera, C.C., Meier, C., & De La Torre-Cantero, J. (2017). Makerspace teaching-learning environment to enhance creative competence in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2017.01.004
  52. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: technology-enhanced knowledge practices. Int J Technol Des Educ, 20, 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9066-4
  53. Shahzada, G., & Khan, H.N. (2018). Do High Self-estimates of Multiple Intelligences Predict High Academic Achievement at Secondary School Level? Journal of Research and Reflections in Education,12(1), 84–92.
  54. Shatunova, O., Anisimova, T., Sabirova, F., & Kalimullina, O. (2019). STEAM as an innovative educational technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 131–144. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/916
  55. Smith, H., Underwood, J., Fitzpatrick, G., & Luckin, R. (2009). Classroom e-science: exposing the work to make it work. Educ. Technol. Soc., 12, 289–308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.289
  56. Stevenson, C., Kleibeuker, S., de Dreu, C., & Crone, E. (2014). Training creative cognition: adolescence as a flexible period for improving creativity. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00827
  57. Sun, L., Kangas, M., Ruokamo, H., & Siklander, S. (2023). A systematic literature review of teacher scaffolding in game-based learning in primary education. Educational Research Review, 40, 100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100546
  58. Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity, collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
  59. Suwistika, R., Ibrohim, I., & Susanto, H. (2024). Improving critical thinking and creative thinking skills through POPBL learning in high school student. JPBI Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 10(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.3017
  60. Tanggaard, L. (2018). Content-Driven Pedagogy: On Passion, Absorption and Immersion as Dynamic Drivers of Creativity. In R. Beghetto, G, Gorazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity—New Directions for Theory, Research, and Practice in Education (pp. 165–177) Springer.
  61. Uziak, J., Oladiran, M.T., Eisenberg, M., & Scheffer, C. (2010). International team approach to ProjectOriented Problem-Based Learning in design. World Transactions for Engineering Technology Education, 8(2), 137–144.
  62. White, P.J., Ardoin N.M., Eames, C., & Monroe, M.C. (2023). Agency in the Anthropocene: Supporting document to the PISA 2025 Science Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, 297. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d3b6cfa-en
  63. Yakman, G., & Lee, H. 2012. Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, 32(6), 1072-1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
  64. Yasin, R.M., Rahman, S., Jusoff, K., Mohd Yunus, M. & Minghat, A.D. (2011). Harnessing Technological-Creativity for Economic Development: A Problem-Oriented Project-Based Learning Approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 13(4), 638–644.
  65. Yasin, R.M., & Rahman, S. (2011). Problem oriented project based learning (POPBL) in promoting education for sustainable development. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 289293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.088
  66. Yuvaci, Z., & Daglioglu, H.E. (2016). Teacher’s part to support creativeness of gifted children in pre-school period and activity examples. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 8(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.239575
  67. Zhou, J., & Su, Y. (2010). A missing piece of the puzzle: The organizational context in cultural patterns of creativity. Management and Organization Review, 6(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00192.x
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 15
Submitted on: Apr 6, 2025
|
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 6, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 María José Cuetos, Natalia Serrano, Adán Manuel Yanes, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 13 (2026): Issue 1 (January 2026)