Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Illustrating the “power” of networks with candy exchange Cover

Illustrating the “power” of networks with candy exchange

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retro-spective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13 495–517.
  2. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
  3. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89(2), 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1086/227866
  4. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
  5. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. American Sociological Review, 27 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
  6. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  7. Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406(6798), 845–845. https://doi.org/10.1038/35022643
  8. Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057189
  9. Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2(1), 60–67.
  10. Neal, J. W., Neal, Z. P., & Cappella, E. (2016). Seeing and being seen: Predictors of accurate perceptions about class-mates’ relationships. Social Networks, 44, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.002
  11. Neal, Z. P. (2011). Differentiating centrality and power in the world city network. Urban Studies, 48(13), 2733–2748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010388954
  12. Neal, Z. P. (2024). Is ‘distinctiveness centrality’actually distinctive? a comment on fronzetti colladon and naldi (2020). PLoS One, 19(4), e0298666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298666
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/connections-2026-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 (formerly 0226-1766) | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 15
Submitted on: Jan 27, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 16, 2026
Published on: Sep 9, 2026
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Zachary P. Neal, Mariah Kornbluh, Andrew MacIntosh, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.