Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Examination of Civil Servants’ Assessment of the New Civil Service Reforms in Kazakhstan Cover

An Examination of Civil Servants’ Assessment of the New Civil Service Reforms in Kazakhstan

Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Abdulla, J., Djebarni, R., & Mellahi, K. (2011). Determinants of job satisfaction in the UAE: A case study of the Dubai police. Personnel Review, 40(1), 126–146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111095555
  2. Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Civil Service Affairs. (2024). Gov.Kz [Internet]. [cited 2024 June 10]. Available from: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/qyzmet?lang=en
  3. Alford, J. & Hughes, O. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 130–148.
  4. Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Profiles of Public Service-Motivated Civil Servants: Evidence from a Multicultural Country. International Journal of Public Administration 35(1), 5–18.
  5. Andrews, R. & Boyne, G. (2010). Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: Testing the Black Box Model of Public Management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443–54.
  6. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. & Walker, R. (2011). The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures of Organizational Performance. Public Management Review 13(2), 227–55.
  7. Anthony, R. (1965). Planning and Control: A Framework for Analysis. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard University Graduate Business School of Business Administration.
  8. Armstrong, M., & Stephen, T. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (13th ed.). London: Kogan Page.
  9. Battaglio, P. & Gelgec, S. (2017). Exploring the structure and meaning of public service motivation in the Turkish public sector: a test of the mediating effects of job characteristics. Public Management Review, 19(8), 1066–1084. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1235723
  10. Birken, S. & Currie, G. (2021). Correction to: Using Organization Theory to Position Middle-Level Managers as Agents of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. Implementation Science: IS, 16(1), 43.
  11. Bhawra, J., Reid, J., White, C., Vanderlee, L., Raine, K. & Hammond, D. (2018). Are Young Canadians Supportive of Proposed Nutrition Policies and Regulations? An Overview of Policy Support and the Impact of Socio-Demographic Factors on Public Opinion. Canadian Journal of Public Health. Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 109(4), 498–505.
  12. Boardman, C. & Sundquist, E. (2009). Toward Understanding Work Motivation: Worker Attitudes and the Perception of Effective Public Service. American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 519–35.
  13. Bokayev, S. (2020). Время Резать По Живому.[Time To Cut To The Quick]. Internet-Journal Vласть. [cited 2021 July 9]. Available from: https://vlast.kz/avtory/39126-vrema-rezat-po-zivomu.html.
  14. Bokayev, B., Davletbayeva, Zh., Amirova, A., Rysbekova, Zh., Torebekova, Z. & Jussupova, G. (2021). Transforming E-government in Kazakhstan: A Citizen-Centric Approach. The Innovation Journal, 26(1), 1–21.
  15. Bokayev, B., Torebekova, Z., Abdykalikova, M. & Davletbayeva, Zh. (2021). Exposing Policy Gaps: The Experience of Kazakhstan in Implementing Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 15(2), 275–90.
  16. Boyne, G. & Chen, A. (2007). Performance Targets and Public Service Improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 17(3), 455–77.
  17. Bracci, E. & Tallaki, M. (2021). Resilience Capacities and Management Control Systems in Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(3), 332–51.
  18. Concept for the Development of Public Administration in the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030. (2021). Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 522 dated February 26, 2021 [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 10]. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2100000522
  19. Currie, G. & Procter, S. (2005). The Antecedents of Middle Managers’ Strategic Contribution: The Case of a Professional Bureaucracy. The Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1325–56.
  20. Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). Sources of Innovation, Autonomy, and Employee Job Satisfaction in Public Organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 155–186. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1820350
  21. Dunleavy, P. & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16.
  22. Dwivedi, Y. & Williams, M. (2008). Demographic Influence on UK Citizens’ e-Government Adoption. Electronic Government an International Journal, 5(3), 261.
  23. Graham, J., Bruce, A. & Tim, P. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Policy brief No. 15, Institute on Governance
  24. Gschwantner, S. & Hiebl, M. (2016). Management Control Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Management Control, 27(4), 371–404.
  25. Herzberg, F. (1974). Motivation-hygiene profiles. Organizational Dynamics, 3(2), 18–29.
  26. Inuwa, M. (2016). Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance: An Empirical Approach. The Millenium University Journal, 1(1), 90–103.
  27. Ismajli, Mr. & Ermira, Q. (2012). Impact of Civil Servant Salaries on the Performance of Local Public Administration in Kosovo. ILIRIA International Review, 2(2), 332.
  28. Issenova, G., Evniev, A., Bokayev, B., Shakishev, K., Sissenova, I. & Zhanseitov, A. (2020). Research Results 2020. Astanacivilservicehub.Org [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 9]. Available from: https://www.astanacivilservicehub.org/research2020?page=1.
  29. Jussupova, G., Bokayev, B. & Zhussip, D. (2019). Digital Government Maturity as a Technologically New E-Government Maturity Model: Experience of Kazakhstan. in Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government - ICEEG 2019. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
  30. Kim, J. & Han, S. (2017). Examining the relationship between civil servant perceptions of organizational culture and job attitudes: In the context of the new public management reform in South Korea. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 157–175. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0372-0.
  31. Kiyak, B., & Karkin, N. (2022). Job characteristics and public service motivation among highly-qualified public employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 316–333. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2118801
  32. Kosenko, E. (2021). Своих Не Бросаем. Как в Реальности Происходит Процесс Оптимизации Государственного Аппарата? [We Don’t Abandon Our People. How Is The Process Of Optimizing The State Apparatus Going On in Reality?] Turanpress.Kz [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 9]. Available from: https://turanpress.kz/obshchestvo/svoikh-ne-brosayem-kak-v-real-nosti-proiskhodit-protsess-optimizatsii-gosudarstvennogo-apparata-2.
  33. Manning, N. & Kraan, D. (2006). The Metrics of Tracking Change in the Public Sector. Call for Papers for the Eleventh International Research Symposium on Public Management, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
  34. Markova, A. (2020). Как Будет Проходить Сокращение Госслужащих в Казахстане. [How civil servants will be cut in Kazakhstan] Kursiv.Kz [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 9]. Available from: https://kursiv.kz/news/obschestvo/2020-09/kak-budet-prokhodit-sokraschenie-gossluzhaschikh-v-kazakhstane.
  35. Masood, A., Qurat-Ul-Ain, Aslam, R. & Rizwan, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Employee Satisfaction of the Public and Private Sector Organizations of Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(2), 97–121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i2.5902 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i2.5902
  36. Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J. (1985). Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–72.
  37. National priorities of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2025 (2021). Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 520 dated February 26, 2021 [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 10]. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2100000520.
  38. Nazarbayev, N. (2012). Strategy Kazakhstan 2050: New political course of the established state, Speech delivered in Astana, December 14, 2012 [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 10]. Available from: http://www.kazakhembus.com/document/address-by-kazakhstan-president-nursultan-nazarbayev-strategy-kazakhstan-2050.
  39. Nguyen, N. T. H., & Tuan, L. T. (2021). Creating Reasonable Workload to Enhance Public Employee Job Satisfaction: The Role of Supervisor Support, Co-Worker Support, and Tangible Job Resources. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(1), 131–162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.2018717
  40. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 592.
  41. Novianti, Kh. R., Roz, K. (2020). Teleworking and Workload Balance on Job Satisfaction: Indonesian Public Sector Workers During Covid-19 Pandemic. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 9(1), 1–10. Available from: https://apmba.ub.ac.id/index.php/apmba/article/view/373.
  42. Nzongola-Ntalaja, G. (2002). UNDP Role in Promoting Good Governance. Seminar for the International Guests at the Congress of the Labor Party of Norway, Oslo.
  43. OECD. (2023). Global Trends in Government Innovation 2023. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/0655b570-en
  44. Parks, R. (1984). Linking Objective and Subjective Measures of Performance. Public Administration Review, 44(2), 118.
  45. Pollitt, C. & Dan, S. (2011). The impacts of the new public management in Europe: A meta-analysis. COCOPS Work Package 1
  46. Shim, D. & Park, H. (2019). Public Service Motivation in a Work Group: Role of Ethical Climate and Servant Leadership. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 203–25.
  47. Strategic Development Plan of Kazakhstan up to 2025. (2018). Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 636 dated February 15, 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2021 July 10]. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U1800000636
  48. Thant, Z. M. & Chang, Y. (2021). Determinants of Public Employee Job Satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory. Public Organizations Review, 21, 157–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00481-6
  49. Van, M. & Schein, E. (1979). Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization edited by B. M. Staw. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–64.
  50. Walker, R., Brewer, G., Boyne, G. & Avellaneda, C. (2011). Market Orientation and Public Service Performance: New Public Management Gone Mad? Public Administration Review, 71(5), 707–17.
  51. Windasari, W. (2019). The Effect of E-Performance Appraisal System and Additional Income of Civil Servant on Performance with Job Satisfaction as Intervening Variable in the Regional Secretarial of Mojokerto City. Airlangga Development Journal, 3(2), 161.
  52. Wooldridge, B. & Floyd, S. (1990). The Strategy Process, Middle Management Involvement, and Organizational Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 231–41.
  53. Wright, B, Hassan, S. & Park, J. (2016). Does a Public Service Ethic Encourage Ethical Behavior? Public Service Motivation, Ethical Leadership and the Willingness to Report Ethical Problems: Psm and Ethical Leadership. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–63.
  54. Wulandari, F. (2021). The effect of cooperative psychological climate on public service performance: the mediating role of harmonious passion and organizational commitment. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(2).
  55. Xie, L. & Yang, Y. (2021). The Influence of Perceptions of Promotion Opportunities on Job Performance and Its Mechanisms: A Case Study of Chinese Junior Civil Servants. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 118–135, Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1766913
  56. Zanardi, M. & Zhau, W. (2020). The Effect of Work Environment on Employee Job Satisfaction with Work Communication as Intervening Variables (Case Study on Civil Servants in Australian Medical and Health Department). MEDALION JOURNAL: Medical Research, Nursing, Health and Midwife Participation, 1(4), 121–126. Available from: https://doi.org/10.59733/medalion.v1i4.56
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 16
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 6, 2024
Published on: Nov 2, 2024
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Gulnara Issenova, Baurzhan Bokayev, Madina Nauryzbek, Zulfiya Torebekova, Aigul Kosherbayeva, Aigerim Amirova, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.