Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Possibilities of Using Decision Support Systems for Agriculture in Areas with High Agrarian Fragmentation Cover

Possibilities of Using Decision Support Systems for Agriculture in Areas with High Agrarian Fragmentation

Open Access
|Apr 2025

Figures & Tables

Assessment of the usefulness of functions available within cloud-based farm management systems in the surveyed farms in general and depending on selected farm and respondents’ characteristics [% of responses]

SpecificationTotalFarms with an area of up to 4 haFarms with an area of over 4 haRespondents with agricultural educationRespondents with education other than agriculturalUsers of at least one decision support system in total (n=127)Not using decision support systems (n=262)
Possibility to receive information about the risk of plant infection/disease77.6365.8390.0091.2770.99100.0066.79
Access to an accurate weather forecast for individual agricultural plots61.9548.2476.3280.9552.6792.9146.95
Possibility to estimate the consumption of raw materials (e.g. consumption of seed, plant protection products, fodder)61.7042.7181.5886.5149.6296.8544.66
Yield prediction (depending on the resources used, detailed weather forecasts)58.6139.2078.9580.9547.7195.2840.84
Collecting and storing data sent by sensors about soil moisture, air temperature, and nutrient content in crops55.2735.1876.3280.1643.1395.2835.88
Remote information exchange with other farmers48.3331.6665.7968.2538.5581.1032.44
Records of sales, inventories, payments, profits47.5624.6271.5872.2235.5091.3426.34
Research on the impact of farm activities on the natural environment37.2820.1055.2661.9025.1977.1717.94
Possibility to collect and process information from systems tracking animals’ behaviour, condition and physical activity32.1313.5751.5858.7319.0866.9315.27
Remotely assigning tasks to employees19.545.5334.2138.899.9251.973.82
Remotely receiving information from employees (about the progress of work, problems)19.285.5333.6838.109.9250.394.20

The area structure of the surveyed farms in comparison to Poland

AreaNumber of farms [GUS, 2020]Farm structure by size [%]
up to 1 ha inclusive1 – 5 ha5 – 10 ha10 – 15 ha15 ha and more
Poland1 316 7591.8750.1521.959.9116.12
Małopolskie voivodeship126 1722.5478.3713.242.793.06
Podkarpackie voivodeship114 1822.3076.8613.752.964.14
Farms surveyed389x62.9820.057.209.77

Characteristics of respondents and surveyed farms in the group in general and depending on farm size [% of responses]

Specification Farm size
Total≤ 4ha>4ha
Ageup to 3510.8011.5610.00
35–5039.5932.1647.37
>5049.6156.2842.63
Respondents’ educationElementary6.439.553.16
Vocational agricultural16.719.0524.74
Vocational other than agricultural26.9936.6816.84
Secondary agricultural14.143.0225.79
Secondary other than agricultural23.6528.6418.42
Higher agricultural1.800.003.68
Higher other than agricultural10.2813.077.37
EmploymentOn the farm exclusively58.6145.7372.11
On and off the farm41.3954.2727.89
Organisational formIndividual farm99.74100.0099.47
Agricultural enterprise0.260.000.53
Type of farmConventional Farm96.1497.4994.74
Organic farm2.832.513.16
Farm with integrated production1.030.002.10
Dominant production directionCrop production79.1890.9567.08
Animal production20.579.0532.92

Barriers to the use of decision support applications and cloud-based farm management systems in the study group in general and depending on selected farm and respondents’ characteristics [% of responses]

SpecificationTotalFarms with an area of up to 4 haFarms with an area of over 4 haRespondents up to 50 years of ageRespondents over 50 years of ageRespondents with agricultural educationRespondents with education other than agricultural
Financial barrier55.0137.1973.6866.8443.0178.5743.51
The belief that there is no need to implement such solutions43.1967.3417.8926.0260.6215.8756.49
Hardware shortages38.0526.6350.0047.4528.5055.5629.39
The need to improve IT skills22.119.0535.7926.0218.1331.7517.56
Lack of trust in such systems and their creators19.0220.6017.379.6928.5011.1122.90
Technical problems (the quality of local infrastructure makes it difficult to access high-speed Internet)16.2011.5621.0523.478.8127.7810.69
These systems are not intuitive/difficult to use16.205.0327.8921.4310.8826.1911.45
Lack of systems that fully meet the needs of farm (too few options available)13.117.5418.9520.415.7018.2510.69
Lack of knowledge of such solutions until taking part in the study12.8519.106.325.1020.739.5214.50
Lack of access to training in the use of this type of solutions8.231.5115.2612.244.1515.874.58
Concern about sharing agricultural activity data with applications7.464.0211.058.166.748.736.87
Lack of time to learn how these systems work5.663.527.897.144.157.944.58
I do not see any barriers to using these solutions1.291.011.582.040.520.791.53

Chi square test of independence results

Criterionχ2
Assessing the usability of cloud-based farm management system features
Farm size (up to 4 ha; over 4 ha)28,91*
Education type (agricultural; non-agricultural)21,39*
Use of decision support systems (Yes; No)48,80*
Assessment of Barriers to Implementation of Decision Support Systems
Age (up to 50; under 50)97,55*
Farm size (up to 4 ha; over 4 ha)65,92*
Education type (agricultural; non-agricultural)64,36*
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Language: English
Page range: 120 - 137
Submitted on: Jan 20, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2025
Published on: Apr 16, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 Paulina Kramarz, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.