References
- Agyemang, G. (2004). Responsibility and accountability without direct control? Local education authorities and the seeking of influence in the UK schools sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(5), 762–788.
- Aidemark, L.-G. (2001). Managed health care perspectives: A study of management accounting reforms on managing financial difficulties in a health care organization. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 545–560.
- Aidt, T. S., Veiga, F. J., & Veiga, L. G. (2010). Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model. Public Choice, 4, 1–24.
- Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public services: Managing with external providers. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Alonso, J., Clifton, J., & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2011). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. COCOPS Working Paper, No.4, European Commission, Brussels.
- Andrews, M. (2008). Good government means different things in different countries. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP08-068. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
- Bald, J. (2016). Deliverology – A science? Retrieved from
http://johnbald.typepad.com/language/2013/07/deliverology-a-science.html (Accessed December 20, 2019). - Barber, M. (2008). Instruction to deliver: Fighting to transform Britain's public services. London, England: Methuen Publishing Ltd.
- Barber, M. (2017). How to deliver improved outcomes for schools. Retrieved from
https://www.wise-qatar.org/2017-wise-research-improved-outcomes-school-systems/ (Accessed January 26, 2020). - Barber, M., Kihn, P., & Moffit, A. (2011b). Deliverology: From idea to implementation. McKinsey on Government, 6, 32–39.
- Barber, M., Moffit, A., & Kihn, P. (2011a). Deliverology 101: A field guide for educational leaders. Corwin PC, Thousand Oaks, USA.
- Barton, A. D. (2006). Public sector accountability and commercial-in-confidence outsourcing contracts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(2), 256–271.
- Birch, L., Jacob, S., & Baby-Bouchard, A. (2019). The Trudeau government's legislative agenda: Election promises and a dual mandate. In L. Birch & F. Pétry (Eds.), Assessing Justin Trudeau's Liberal government: 353 promises and a mandate for change (pp. 27–42). Quebec, QC: Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Bjornenak, T. (2000). Understanding cost differences in the public sector: A cost drivers approach. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 193–211.
- Blum, J. R., Manning, N., & Srivastava, V. (2012). Public sector management reform: Toward a problem-solving approach. Economic Premise, No. 100. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Booth, D. (2014). Aiding institutional reform in developing countries: Lessons from the Philippines on what works, what doesn’t, and why. Working Politically in Practice Series, Case Study No. 1. London, England: The Asia Foundation and the ODI.
- Bouchal, P., Kidson, M., Norris, E., & Rutter, J. (2014). Doing them justice: Lessons from four cases of policy implementation. London, England: Institute for Government.
- Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Comparing performance across public sectors. In W. Van Dooren, & S. Van de Walle (Eds.). Performance information in the public sector. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan, 71–82.
- Box, R. C. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 19–43.
- Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What's the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.
- Brown, R., & Sprohge, H.-D. (1987). Governmental managerial accounting: What and where is it? Public Budgeting and Finance, 7(3), 35–46.
- Budget Code of Ukraine. (2010). Retrieved from
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17 (Accessed February 10, 2020). - Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. (2018). Difference-indifferences with multiple time periods and an application on the minimum wage and employment. Working Paper.
- Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government, accounting. Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 243–267.
- Cleary, S. (2007). The Prime Minister's Delivery Unit (PMDU), 2005–2007: What impact did the machinery of government and leadership changes have on the PMDU? BA undergraduate thesis, p. 1.
- Da Veiga, M., & Major, M. (2019). Governance as integrity: The case of the internal oversight at the United Nations through the lens of public and private bureaucracies transaction cost economics. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(1), 67–91.
- de Bruijn, H., & van Helden, G. J. (2006). A plea for dialogue driven performance-based management systems: Evidence from the Dutch Public Sector. Financial Accountability and Management, 22(4), 405–423.
- Fedosov, V., & Paientko, T. (2018). Government financial accountability: Key problems and main trends in post-communist countries. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 99(155), 25–39.
- Fedosov, V., & Paientko, T. (2019). Opportunistic government behaviour: How controlling approaches in public management can prevent it. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 104(160), 37–54.
- Freeguard, G., & Gold, J. (2015). Data-driven delivery: Lessons from the O’Malley administration of Maryland. Maryland: Institute for Government.
- Gash, T., Hallsworth, M., Ismail, S., & Paun, A. (2008). Performance art: Enabling better management of public services. London, England: Institute for Government.
- Haws, E. (2018). Oft critiqued Liberal mandate tracker to become “more useful,” says government “deliverology” chief. The Hill Times. Retrieved from
https://www.hilltimes.com/2018/01/24/liberals-mandate-letter-tracker-great-conversationgetting-refresh-momentarily-mendelsohn/131770 . - Holt, J., & Manning, N. (2014). Fukuyama is right about measuring state quality: Now what? Governance, 27(4), 717–728.
- Jakobsen, M. L., Baekgaard, M., Moynihan, D. P., & van Loon, N. (2018). Making sense of performance regimes: Rebalancing external accountability and internal learning. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(2), 127–141. doi: org/10.1093/ppmgov/
- Jarvinen, J. (2009). Shifting NPM agendas and management accountants’ occupational identities’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1187–1210.
- Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2008). Performance information and performance steering: integrated system or loose coupling? In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector (42–57). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- lo Storto, C. (2014). Benchmarking website performance in the public sector: a non-parametric approach. Journal of Computers, 9(3), 636–643.
- Majette, G. R. (2019). Controlling health care costs under the ACA – Chaos, uncertainty, and transition with CMMI and IPAB. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 4, 857–861.
- Ouda, H., & Klischewski, R. (2019). Accounting and politicians: A theory of accounting information usefulness. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 496–517.
- Shepherd, R. P. (2018). Expenditure reviews and the federal experience: Program evaluation and its contribution to assurance provision. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(3), 347–370. doi: 10.3138/cjpe.43180
- ter Bogt, H. J., & van Helden, G. J. (2000). Accounting change in Dutch government: Exploring the gap between expectations and realizations. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 263–279.
- Watkins, K. (2013). Jim Kim's science of delivery: what role for politics? | Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Retrieved from
http://www.odi.org/comment/7703-jim-kims-science-delivery-role-politics (Accessed December 20, 2019). - Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Difference-indifferences estimation. Quantile, 6, 25–47.