Fig. 1
Fig. 2
DID method results in the energy saving calculation
| Group number | DID in the effectiveness 2016–2017 | DID in the efficiency 2016–2017 | DID in the effectiveness 2017–2018 | DID in the efficiency 2017–2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Heat | 0.6 | 5.5 | 0.3 | 5.6 |
| 2. Heat | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| 3. Heat | 0.9 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 7.2 |
| 4. Heat | 1.0 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 3.8 |
| 1. Electricity | 6.1 | 8.7 | 5.9 | 10.7 |
| 2. Electricity | 3.4 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 7.6 |
| 3. Electricity | 6.8 | 9.1 | 6.7 | 15.1 |
| 4. Electricity | 8.8 | 11.6 | 9.7 | 14.5 |
| 1. Water | 0.05 | 2.8 | 0.06 | 3.4 |
| 2. Water | 0.07 | 5.2 | 0.13 | 8.2 |
| 3. Water | 0.02 | 4.4 | 0.02 | 3.7 |
| 4. Water | 0.08 | 2.9 | 0.09 | 3.8 |
Performance indicators of the local budget programmes for the energy saving task
| The effectiveness – utility consumption level | The norm indicator (for the whole country or in a particular region) | Indicator accomplished in the budget programme for the period 1 | Indicator accomplished in the budget programme for the period 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heat supply (H), Gcal per 1 m3 of heated space | Nh | H1 | H2 |
| Electricity (E), kWh/m2 | Ne | E1 | E2 |
| Water supply (W), cubic metres per square metre | Ng | W1 | W2 |
| Efficiency (Quality) – the level of savings | Cost savings for a specific region or the country | Accomplished in the budget programme for the period 1 | Accomplished in the budget programme for the period 2 |
| The level of heat supply saving (H),% | NE | EH1 | EH2 |
| The level of electricity saving (E),% | NE | EE1 | EE2 |
| The level of water supply saving (G),% | NE | EW1 | EW2 |