Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Damage Detection on Steel Truss Bridges Using Modal Based Methods Cover

Damage Detection on Steel Truss Bridges Using Modal Based Methods

Open Access
|Apr 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

General research flow

Figure 2:

Damage scenarios modelled in the experiment

Table 1:

Models and damage scenario

ModelsDamage scenarioDamage location
Intact--
Dmg-CCCutting diagonal membersL/2 (0.5 L)
Dmg-BCBuckling diagonal membersL/2 (0.5 L)
Dmg-ECMissing diagonal membersL/2 (0.5 L)
Dmg-CECutting diagonal membersL/5 (0.2 L)
Dmg-BEBuckling diagonal membersL/5 (0.2 L)
Dmg-EEMissing diagonal membersL/5 (0.2 L)
Figure 3:

Rembun Bridge after collapsing due to severe corrosion on the bottom chord (right)

Figure 4:

The diagonal member at the end was struck by a vehicle

Table 2:

Section properties

MembersSection properties [mm]
End postL 30×30×3
Upper chord2L 40×40×4
Lower chord2L 40×40×4
Diagonal membersL 30×30×3
Portal strutL 30×30×3
StrutL 30×30×3
GirderL 50×50×5
Figure 5:

Geometry of the steel frame bridge specimen

Figure 6:

The steel frame bridge specimen

Figure 7:

General experimental setup

Figure 8:

Loading scheme

Figure 9:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the Dmg-CC structure

Figure 10:

Experimental simulation of mid-span diagonal member damage (Dmg-CC)

Figure 11:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-CC model

Table 3:

Comparison of modal damage index accuracy for mid-span diagonal cutting damage (Dmg-CC)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.030.090.380.020.120.300.270.230.001.440.130.36
MSSi0.000.000.000.000.000.000.070.000.000.000.000.080.010.08
MSCi0.000.000.000.000.360.000.050.020.010.030.000.480.040.21
MSCSi0.000.000.000.020.220.020.090.130.050.010.000.530.050.22
Figure 12:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the dmg-BC structure

Figure 13:

Experimental simulation of mid-span diagonal member damage (Dmg-BC)

Figure 14:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-BC model

Table 4:

Comparison of modal Damage Index Accuracy for Mid-Span Buckling Damage Model (Dmg-BC)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.010.040.090.260.170.440.100.040.001.160.110.32
MSSi0.000.000.000.010.010.000.250.000.020.010.000.290.030.16
MSCi0.000.000.140.030.010.020.450.020.140.000.000.810.070.27
MSCSi0.000.000.000.050.290.060.310.300.020.000.001.030.090.31
Figure 15:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the Dmg-EC structure

Figure 16:

Experimental simulation of mid-span diagonal member damage (Dmg-EC)

Figure 17:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-EC model

Table 5:

Comparison of modal damage index accuracy for mid-span diagonal member removal (Dmg-EC)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.000.070.070.550.030.670.220.040.001.660.150.39
MSSi0.000.000.000.000.080.000.180.140.010.020.000.430.040.20
MSCi0.000.000.120.130.000.110.500.150.030.010.001.060.100.31
MSCSi0.000.000.000.000.180.390.110.450.060.000.001.250.110.34
Figure 18:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the Dmg-CE structure

Figure 19:

Experimental simulation of diagonal member damage at 1/5 of the span (Dmg-CE)

Figure 20:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-CE model

Table 6:

Accuracy comparison of modal damage indices for 1/5-span diagonal cutting damage (Dmg-CE)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.010.030.110.100.050.010.110.070.000.500.050.21
MSSi0.000.000.000.010.000.050.010.030.000.000.000.110.010.10
MSCi0.000.000.000.000.020.000.030.020.040.030.000.130.010.11
MSCSi0.000.000.000.000.040.110.030.070.010.000.000.270.020.16
Figure 21:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the dmg-BE structure

Figure 22:

Experimental simulation of diagonal member damage at 1/5 of the span (Dmg-BE)

Figure 23:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-BE model

Table 7:

Accuracy comparison of modal damage indices for 1/5-span diagonal buckling damage (Dmg-BE)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.010.060.000.000.010.010.120.060.000.270.020.16
MSSi0.000.010.050.010.000.010.000.000.000.010.000.080.010.09
MSCi0.000.000.020.140.000.000.020.020.000.010.000.210.020.14
MSCSi0.000.000.020.140.020.000.000.040.010.000.000.230.020.14
Figure 24:

Finite element model and modal displacement of the dmg-EE structure

Figure 25:

Experimental simulation of diagonal member damage at 1/5 of the span (Dmg-EE)

Figure 26:

Curvature index of each method on the DMG-EC model

Table 8:

Accuracy comparison of modal damage indices for 1/5-span diagonal member removal damage (Dmg-EE)

Modal parameterSquared displacement difference (unitless)SSEMSERMSE
0.0L0.1L0.2L0.3L0.4L0.5L0.6L0.7L0.8L0.9L1.0L
MSIi0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.060.040.000.130.010.11
MSSi0.000.000.000.000.000.010.000.000.000.000.000.020.000.04
MSCi0.000.000.000.000.000.000.020.020.010.010.000.060.010.08
MSCSi0.000.000.010.030.020.000.000.040.000.000.000.110.010.10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0093 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 25, 2026
Published on: Apr 21, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Dita Kamarul Fitriyah, Budi Suswanto, Heppy Kristijanto, Ahmad Basshofi Habieb, Djoko Irawan, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.