Table 1:
Division of study area
| Ajeel oil field | |
|---|---|
| Zone 1 | Zone 2 |
| Sample 1 | Sample 5 |
| Sample 2 | Sample 6 |
| Sample 3 | Sample 7 |
| Sample 4 | Sample 8 |

Figure 1:
Map of study sampling

Figure 2:
Container model uses to save the collected samples

Figure 3:
Collection samples from Ajeel oil field

Figure 4:
Measurement of heavy metal concentrations in soil samples in Zone 1 of the Ajeel oil field

Figure 5:
Measurement of heavy elements concentrations for soil models in Zone 2 of the Ajeel oil field
Table 2:
A statistical analysis of the results of heavy metal concentrations samples, Zone 1
| Heavy elements (mg/l) | Mean | Median | Std. deviation | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Pb+2 | 20.46 | 22.09 | 8.52 | 9.11 | 28.54 |
| Cadmium Cd+2 | 1.19 | 0.41 | 1.58 | 0.33 | 3.44 |
| Chromium Cr+3 | 105.86 | 136.83 | 33.72 | 70.63 | 140.97 |
| Zinc Zn+2 | 58.07 | 68.89 | 22.02 | 30.13 | 72.48 |
| Nickel Ni+2 | 43.14 | 43.08 | 24.16 | 20.32 | 67.41 |
| Copper Cu+2 | 18.06 | 19.34 | 4.67 | 11.25 | 22.41 |
| Iron Fe+3 | 3.84 | 4.09 | 1.05 | 2.31 | 4.77 |
| Manganese Mn+2 | 693.50 | 725.50 | 102.50 | 537.0 | 733.0 |
| Cobalt Co+2 | 9.87 | 9.79 | 3.23 | 6.80 | 13.10 |
| Molybdenum Mo+6 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 1.65 |
| Arsenic As | 3.75 | 4.10 | 2.87 | 1.20 | 6.70 |
Table 3:
The statistical analysis of the results of soil contamination, Zone 2
| Heavy elements (mg/l) | Mean | Median | Std. deviation | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Pb+2 | 37.58 | 38.08 | 1.83 | 35.11 | 38.93 |
| Cadmium Cd+2 | 3.79 | 4.69 | 2.52 | 0.06 | 5.72 |
| Chromium Cr+3 | 101.33 | 97.68 | 9.94 | 94.22 | 115.75 |
| Zinc Zn+2 | 91.90 | 89.92 | 5.25 | 87.52 | 99.52 |
| Nickel Ni+2 | 61.55 | 65.73 | 11.23 | 45.38 | 69.36 |
| Copper Cu+2 | 33.83 | 37.46 | 9.17 | 20.17 | 40.25 |
| Iron Fe+3 | 433.29 | 441.28 | 425.92 | 48.37 | 897.40 |
| Manganese Mn+2 | 30.92 | 30.30 | 10.95 | 7.32 | 33.76 |
| Cobalt Co+2 | 1.86 | 1.89 | 0.10 | 1.71 | 1.95 |
| Molybdenum Mo+6 | 7.73 | 7.70 | 0.81 | 6.90 | 8.60 |
| Arsenic As+3 | 7.23 | 7.10 | 0.82 | 6.50 | 8.10 |
Table 4:
Pollution levels of Nemerow Pollution Index PN
| Pollution level | PN |
|---|---|
| Low pollution | PN < 1 |
| Moderate pollution | 1 ≤ PN < 2 |
| High pollution | 2 ≤ PN < 3 |
| Very high pollution | PN ≥ 3 |

Figure 6:
Results of PN for the Ajeel oil field – Zone 1

Figure 7:
Outcomes of pollution index PN – Ajeel oil field – Zone 2

Figure 8:
Pollution level distribution map for Nemerow Pollution Index model in the Ajeel oil field
Table 5:
Limitation of potential environmental index PRI
| Degree of risk | PRI value |
|---|---|
| Low risk | PRI≥50 |
| Moderate risk | 50 > PRI ≤ 100 |
| Considerable risk | 100> PRI ≥ 150 |
| Very high Risk | 150> PRI ≥ 200 |
| Extreme Risk | PRI>200 |

Figure 9:
PRI results of Ajeel oil field - Zone 1

Figure 10:
Outcomes of PRI-Ajeel oil field - Zone 2

Figure 11:
Map of the distribution of PRI levels, model of environmental risk PRI of Ajeel oil field

