Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic Survey of prestressed concrete bridges in Prague Cover

Diagnostic Survey of prestressed concrete bridges in Prague

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Cross-section of a bridge, where the superstructures consist of I-73 girders (Dopravoprojekt, 1973)

Figure 2:

Reinforcement of the 21-meter-long I-73 girder with prestressing tendons (Dopravoprojekt, 1973)

Figure 3:

Three-span bridge (left) and two-span bridges (right), both located in Prague

Figure 4:

Significant active water leakage into the cells between the I-73 girders. Visible surface degradation of the concrete and exposed reinforcement. Observable paths of prestressing reinforcement (cracks and leachates)

Figure 5:

Presence of non-grouted tendon ducts and corrosion of prestressing strands and wires

Figure 6:

Presence of ungrouted tendon ducts and corrosion affecting the prestressing strands

Table 1:

Summary of Concrete Test Results

Bridge no.Structural condition of superstructure (Scale I–VII)Strength class of concreteConversion of Cl- to cement quantity of approximately 420 kg in 1 m3 of concrete [%]Concrete carbonation depth [mm]
ČSN 736221ČSN EN 206+A2Depth 0 – 15 [mm]Depth 15 – 30 [mm]Depth 30 – 45 [mm]
1VIC 45/550.450.320.161 – 7
2VC 45/550.710.580.373 – 6
3VIC 50/601,170.700.353 – 12
4VC 40/500,890.700.444 – 13
5VC 45/550.150.110.072 – 8
6IVC 40/500.250.120.051 – 7
7VIC 45/550.780.590.441 – 9
8VC 35/450.380.300.152 – 10
Table 2:

Condition Assessment of Prestressing Reinforcement

Condition of reinforcementCorrosion damageDamage description
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_001.pngLevel 1Reinforcement showing no signs of corrosion.
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_002.pngLevel 2The reinforcement exhibits only localized surface corrosion, with no impact on cross-sectional area.
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_003.pngLevel 3Surface corrosion is present without accumulation of corrosion products, and its impact on cross-section reduction and mechanical properties is negligible.
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_004.pngLevel 4Surface corrosion is fully distributed, with corrosion products peeling off. Cross-sectional area reduction has already reached approximately 2 – 4%; this type of corrosion represents a borderline case in terms of its negative effect on mechanical properties.
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_005.pngLevel 5The strand exhibits fully spread surface corrosion, with extensive peeling of corrosion products. Noticeable deformation and cross-sectional area loss are significant, reaching several tens of percent.
graphic/j_cee-2026-0049_ingr_006.pngLevel 6Noticeable deformation of the strand is observed, with some wires broken or fully corroded. Cross-sectional area is significantly reduced, by 50 % or more.
Figure 7:

Prestressing Reinforcement Condition Evaluated by Girder Location

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0049 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Page range: 461 - 468
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 2, 2025
Published on: Mar 24, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Stanislav Rehacek, David Citek, Milan Holy, Martin Krystov, Adam Citek, Ales Mezera, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.