Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relating Student Engagement Indicators to Academic Performance Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis Cover

Relating Student Engagement Indicators to Academic Performance Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Quin, D. Longitudinal and Contextual Associations between Teacher-Student Relationships and Student Engagement: A Systematic Review. – Review of Educational Research, Vol. 87, 2017, No 2, pp. 345-387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434.10.3102/0034654316669434
  2. 2. Nguyen, T. D., C. Marisa, M. Jason. Understanding Student Behavioral Engagement: Importance of Student Interaction with Peers and Teachers. – The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 111, 2018, No 2, pp. 163-174.10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
  3. 3. Kuh, G. D., T. M. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie, R. M. Gonyea. Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. – The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 79, 2008, No 5, pp. 540-563.10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
  4. 4. Kuh, G. D., S. Hu. The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. – The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 24, 2001, No 3, pp. 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0005.10.1353/rhe.2001.0005
  5. 5. Higuera-Mendieta, D. R., S. Cortés-Corrales, J. Quintero, C. Gonzalez-Uribe. KAP Surveys and Dengue Control in Colombia: Disentangling the Effect of Sociodemographic Factors Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – PloS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 10, 2016, No 9.10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016504025727682141
  6. 6. Pike, G. R. Measuring Quality: A Comparison of Us News Rankings and NSSE Benchmarks. – Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45, 2004, No 2, pp. 193-208. DOI: 10.1023/b:rihe.0000015695.84207.44.10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015695.84207.44
  7. 7. Bang, H., M. Chang, C. Lee. Racial and Linguistic Status Differences in the Effect of Interscholastic Sport Participation on School Engagement and Academic Performance among High School Students. – Psychological Reports, Vol. 123, 2020, No 2, pp. 452-471.10.1177/003329411881384530451593
  8. 8. Reschly, A. L., S. L. Christenson. Prediction of Dropout among Students with Mild Disabilities: A Case for the Inclusion of Student Engagement Variables. – Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 27, 2006, No 5, pp. 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050301.10.1177/07419325060270050301
  9. 9. DiLullo, C., P. McGee, R. Kriebel. Demystifying the Millennial Student: A Reassessment in Measures of Character and Engagement in Professional Education. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2011, No 4, pp. 214-226. DOI:10.1002/ase.240.10.1002/ase.24021735557
  10. 10. Martinez, S., E. Mickey. The Effects of Participation in Interscholastic Sports on Latino Students’ Academic Achievement. – Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, Vol. 7, 2013, pp. 97-114. doi:10.1179/1935739713Z.0000000007.10.1179/1935739713Z.0000000007
  11. 11. Gharipour, M., L. T. Amber. Curriculum Development in Health and the Built Environment: Creating a Multidisciplinary Platform to Enhance Knowledge and Engagement. – Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 2020, pp. 2631-6862. DOI 10.1108/ARCH-09-2019-0212.
  12. 12. Martin, F., D. U. Bolliger. Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. – Online Learn, Vol. 22, 2018, pp. 205-222.10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  13. 13. Trowler, V., P. Trowler. Student Engagement Evidence Summary. York, UK, Higher Education Academy, 2010.
  14. 14. Ashwin, P., D. McVitty. The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices. – In: The European Higher Education Area. A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, P. Scott, Eds. Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 2015.
  15. 15. Fredricks, J. A., P. Blumenfeld, J. Friedel, A. Paris. School Engagement. – In: What Do Children Need to Flourish? Boston, MA, Springer, 2005, pp. 305-321.10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
  16. 16. Sun, Y., L. Ni, Y. Zhao, X. L. Shen, N. Wang. Understanding Students’ Engagement in MOOCs: An Integration of Self-Determination Theory and Theory of Relationship Quality. – British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 50, 2019, No 6, pp. 3156-3174.10.1111/bjet.12724
  17. 17. Kahn, P., L. Everington, K. Kelm, I. Reid, F. Watkins. Understanding Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments: The Role of Reflexivity. – Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 65, 2017, No 1, pp. 203-218.10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
  18. 18. Mayer, R. E. Using Multimedia for e-Learning. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 33, 2017, No 5, pp. 403-423.10.1111/jcal.12197
  19. 19. Bonwell, C. C., J. A. Eison. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. – ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, 1991, pp. 20036-21183.
  20. 20. Leach, L. Enhancing Student Engagement in one Institution. – Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 40, 2016, No 1, pp. 23-47.10.1080/0309877X.2013.869565
  21. 21. McClenney, K., C. N. Marti, C. Adkins. Student Engagement and Student Outcomes: Key Findings from. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. ERIC Number: ED529076, 2012, p. 6.
  22. 22. Veiga, F. H. Assessing Student Engagement in School: Development and Validation of a Four-Dimensional Scale. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 217, 2016, pp. 813-819.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.153
  23. 23. Kim, P. W. Ambient Intelligence in a Smart Classroom for Assessing Students’ Engagement Levels. – Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol. 10, 2019, No 10, pp. 3847-3852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1077-8.10.1007/s12652-018-1077-8
  24. 24. Bond, M. Facilitating Student Engagement through the Flipped Classroom Approach in K-12: A Systematic Review. – Computers & Education, Vol. 151, 2020, 103819.10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
  25. 25. Oladipupo, O., O. Olugbara. Evaluation of Data Analytics-Based Clustering Algorithms for Knowledge Mining in Student Engagement Data. – Intelligent Data Analysis, Vol. 23, 2019, No 5, pp. 1055-1071. DOI: 10.3233/IDA-184254.10.3233/IDA-184254
  26. 26. Skinner, E. A., M. J. Belmont. Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. – Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 85, 2008, No 4, 571.10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  27. 27. Fredricks, J. A., W. McColskey. The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-Report Instruments. – In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer, 2012, pp. 763-782.
  28. 28. Zilvinskis, J., A. A. Masseria, G. R. Pike. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Examining the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Revised National Survey of Student Engagement. – Research in Higher Education, Vol. 58, 2017, No 8, pp. 880-903.10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6
  29. 29. Goggins, K. A., E. Bruce, W. Oddson, L. Brent, R. E. Tammy. Anatomical Locations for Capturing Magnitude Differences in Foot-Transmitted Vibration Exposure, Determined Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2020, pp. 1-15.10.1080/1463922X.2020.1731623
  30. 30. Abdi, H., D. Valentin. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – In: N. Salkind, Ed. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2007, pp. 652-657.
  31. 31. Murtagh, F. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.10.1007/s11336-006-1579-x
  32. 32. Das, S., X. Sun. Association Knowledge for Fatal Run-Off-Road Crashes by Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – IATSS Research, Vol. 39, 2016, No 2, pp. 146-155.10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.07.001
  33. 33. Kim, K., E. Yamashita. Corresponding Characteristics and Circumstances of Collision-Involved Pedestrian in Hawaii. Transportation Research Record. – Journal of Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2424, 2008, pp. 18-24.
  34. 34. Fagnant, D. J., K. M. Kockelman. Motorcycle Use in the United States: Crash Experiences, Safety Perspectives, and Countermeasures. – Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 7, 2015, No 1, pp. 20-39.10.1080/19439962.2014.894164
  35. 35. LeRoux, B., H. Rouanetm. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. USA, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010.
  36. 36. Simpson, J. C., S. Wilson, N. Currey. Motorcyclists’ Perceptions and Experiences of Riding and Risk and Their Advice for Safety. – Journal of Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 16, 2015, No 2, pp. 159-167.10.1080/15389588.2014.91185224761932
  37. 37. Jalayer, M., M. Pour-Rouholamin, H. Zhou. Wrong Way Driving Crashes: A Multiple Correspondence Approach to Identify Contributing Factors. – Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, 2018, No 1, pp. 35-41.10.1080/15389588.2017.134726028657352
  38. 38. Greenacre, M. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. 3rd Edition. Barcelona, Spain, CRC Press, 2017. ISBN-13: 978-1-4987-3177-5.
  39. 39. Yokota, K., W. Kazumi, W. Taeko, O. Yusuke, H. Kazuki, F. Goro. Crime Linkage of Sex Offences in Japan by Multiple Correspondence Analysis. – Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 14, 2017, No 2, pp. 109-119.10.1002/jip.1468
  40. 40. Sivasankaran, S. K., V. Balasubramanian. Investigation of Pedestrian Crashes Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis in India. – International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 27, 2020, No 2, pp. 144-155.10.1080/17457300.2019.168100531709899
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2021-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 102
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 21, 2020
Published on: Mar 30, 2021
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Ropo E. Ogunsakin, Sibusiso Moyo, Oludayo, O. Olugbara, Connie Israel, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.