Table 1.
Classification of soils according to their susceptibility to drought.
| Category | Soil textural groups |
|---|---|
| I. Very light – Highly sensitive to drought | loose sand |
| loose silty sand | |
| slightly loamy sand | |
| slightly loamy silty sand | |
| II. Light – Sensitive to drought | loamy light sand |
| loamy silty light sand | |
| loamy heavy sand | |
| loamy silty heavy sand | |
| III. Medium – Moderately sensitive to drought | light loam |
| light silty loam | |
| loamy silt | |
| silt | |
| sandy silt | |
| IV. Heavy – Slightly sensitive to drought | medium loam |
| medium silty loam | |
| heavy loam | |
| heavy silty loam | |
| clayey silt | |
| clay | |
| silty clay |
[i] SMSR, https://susza.iung.pulawy.pl/kategorie/ 1
Table 2.
Calculated maize harvests for silage or grain by voivodeship.
| Voivodeship | Maize for grain (grain, thousand tonnes) | Maize for silage (dry weight, thousand tonnes) |
|---|---|---|
| Dolnośląskie | 1,187.76 | 128.48 |
| Kujawsko-pomorskie | 886.58 | 507.31 |
| Lubelskie | 831.10 | 349.58 |
| Lubuskie | 170.97 | 56.92 |
| Łódzkie | 558.83 | 325.26 |
| Małopolskie | 465.94 | 89.79 |
| Mazowieckie | 938.10 | 1,081.33 |
| Opolskie | 847.08 | 187.65 |
| Podkarpackie | 708.67 | 54.83 |
| Podlaskie | 530.72 | 1,063.11 |
| Pomorskie | 170.09 | 210.86 |
| Śląskie | 396.01 | 178.86 |
| Świętokrzyskie | 213.94 | 121.98 |
| Warmińsko-mazurskie | 427.57 | 409.53 |
| Wielkopolskie | 934.55 | 889.78 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 272.56 | 105.48 |
| POLAND | 9,540.47 | 5,760.73 |

Figure 1.
Calculated harvest of maize grain in 2023 (by county).

Figure 2.
Calculated harvest of maize grain in 2023 (by municipality).

Figure 3.
Calculated harvest of maize for silage in 2023 (by county).

Figure 4.
Calculated harvest of maize for silage in 2023 (by municipality).
Table 3.
Calculated harvest of spring and winter rapeseed by voivodeship.
| Voivodeship | Spring rapeseed [thousand tonnes] | Winter rapeseed [thousand tonnes] |
|---|---|---|
| Dolnośląskie | 1.51 | 542.77 |
| Kujawsko-pomorskie | 1.82 | 216.43 |
| Lubelskie | 6.02 | 530.72 |
| Lubuskie | 0.37 | 90.78 |
| Łódzkie | 0.54 | 78.30 |
| Małopolskie | 0.76 | 65.12 |
| Mazowieckie | 2.06 | 176.26 |
| Opolskie | 0.78 | 324.16 |
| Podkarpackie | 0.90 | 109.57 |
| Podlaskie | 1.37 | 78.97 |
| Pomorskie | 1.84 | 226.95 |
| Śląskie | 0.27 | 94.13 |
| Świętokrzyskie | 1.10 | 113.17 |
| Warmińsko-mazurskie | 1.79 | 286.77 |
| Wielkopolskie | 1.12 | 189.94 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 0.71 | 244.33 |
| POLAND | 22.96 | 3,368.38 |

Figure 5.
Calculated winter rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by county).

Figure 6.
Calculated winter rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by municipality).

Figure 7.
Calculated spring rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by county).

Figure 8.
Calculated spring rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by municipality).

Figure 9.
Energy potential from maize and rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by county).

Figure 10.
Energy potential from maize and rapeseed harvest in 2023 (by municipality).