
Figure 1.
The catchment area and basins of the Baltic Sea covered by PLC monitoring.
BOB – Bothnian Bay, BOS – Bothnian Sea, GUF – Gulf of Finland, GUR – Gulf of Riga, BAP – Baltic Proper, DS – Danish Straits, KAT – Kattegat
Source: Svendsen, Gustafsson, 2024
Table 1.
The trend-based estimate for normalized annual inputs of phosphorus (TP) in 2022.
| Baltic Sea Sub-basin | MAI# | P input 2022 | Statistical uncertainty 2022 | P input including stat. uncert. 2022 | Exceedance of MAI in 2022 | Input 2022 including stat. uncertainty % MAI | Classification of achieved reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t year−1 | |||||||
| Bothnian Bay (BOB) | 2 675 | 2 350 | 149 | 2 499 | 93 | ||
| Bothnian Sea (BOS) | 2 773 | 2 149 | 106 | 2 255 | 81 | ||
| Baltic Proper (BAP) | 7 360 | 12 386 | 807 | 13 193 | 5 833 | 179 | |
| Gulf of Finland (GUF | 3 600 | 4 242 | 723 | 4 965 | 1 365 | 138 | |
| Gulf of Riga (GUR) | 2 020 | 1 903 | 234 | 2 138 | 118 | 106 | |
| Danish Straits (DS) | 1 601 | 1 148 | 57 | 1 205 | 75 | ||
| Kattegat (KAT) | 1 687 | 1 360 | 67 | 1 427 | 85 | ||
| Baltic Sea (BAS) | 21 716 | 24 958 | 1 259 | 26 217 | 4 501 | 121 | |
# As adopted by the 2013 HELCOM Copenhagen Ministerial Meeting (HELCOM, 2013) and in BSAP update 2021 (HELCOM 2021). The table also contains data on statistical uncertainty, the remaining reduction needed to reach MAI and inputs in 2022, including statistical uncertainty in percentages of MAI. Classification of achieving MAI is given in colours: green = MAI fulfilled, yellow = fulfilment is not determined due to statistical uncertainty, and red = MAI not fulfilled. NOTE: For consistency with MAI no rounding (to tenth, hundreds or thousands) has been performed in the indicator.
Source: Inputs of nutrients … 1995–2022

Figure 2.
Significant reductions of total annual inputs of phosphorus achieved in 2022 (in %) since the reference period 1997–2003 (blue arrow) and recent changes (red arrow)
where: recent changes are significant changes since last breakpoint of the timeseries. The arrows indicate decreasing (↓) inputs, and only significant changes are shown.
Source: Svendsen et al., 2024

Figure 3.
Actual total waterborne annual input of phosphorus (TP) to the Baltic Sea and sub-basins from 1995 to 2022 (tons per year).
BAS – Baltic Sea, BOB – Bothnian Bay, BOS – Bothnian Sea, BAP – Baltic Proper, GUF – Gulf of Finland, GUR – Gulf of Riga, DS – Danish Straits, KAT – Kattegat. The normalized total annual inputs of phosphorus are given as a black line. The trend line for normalized total phosphorus is given as a green line with markers. In cases when a break point divides the trend into two parts, the second part (called trend 2) is shown by a green line without marker. In cases with two breaks points the third part (called trend 3) is indicated as a purple line. (Solid trend line shows statistically significant trend and dotted line no statistically significant trend). The MAI as adopted by the 2013 HELCOM Copenhagen Ministerial Meeting (HELCOM 2013) is shown as the bold dotted blue line.
Source: Svendsen et al., 2024
Table 2.
Years with the statistically identified breakpoints in trend lines of total phosphorus TP) inputs to the Baltic Sea and its sub-basins during 1995–2022.
| Breakpoints | Change [%] since reference period | Change [%] after last breakpoint | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bothnian Bay | −18 | n.r. | |
| Bothnian Sea | −23 | n.r. | |
| Baltic Proper | −26 | n.r. | |
| Gulf of Finland | 2012 | −48 | - |
| Gulf of Riga | −32 | n.r. | |
| Danish Straits | 2000 | −22 | −17 |
| Kattegat | −20 | n.r. | |
| Baltic Sea | −32 | n.r. |
[ii] Source: Svendsen et al., 2024
Table 3.
Country – Baltic Sea basin total phosphorus input ceilings in tons per year (2021).
| Country | Baltic Sea basin# | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOB | BOS | BAP | GUF | GUR | DS | KAT | |
| Germany (DE) | - | - | 203 | - | - | 401 | |
| Denmark (DK) | - | - | 21 | - | - | 979 | 815 |
| Estonia (EE) | - | - | 9 | 22 | 185 | - | - |
| Finland (FI) | 1683 | 1246 | 315 | - | - | - | |
| Lithuania (LT) | - | - | 703 | - | 175 | - | - |
| Latvia (LV) | - | - | 167 | - | 1061 | - | - |
| Poland (PL) | - | - | 4198 | - | - | - | - |
| (Russia (RU) | - | - | 242 | 2909 | 99 | - | - |
| Sweden (SE) | 811 | 1133 | 318 | - | - | 116 | 753 |
| Atmospheric deposition | 181 | 394 | 1046 | 150 | 93 | 105 | 118 |
| Belarus (BY) | - | - | 349 | - | 407 | - | - |
| Czech Republic (CZ) | - | - | 57 | - | - | - | - |
| Ukraine (UA) | - | - | 47 | - | - | - | - |
| MAI | 2675 | 2773 | 7360 | 3600 | 2020 | 1601 | 1687 |

Figure 4.
Overall progress results towards NIC implementation by 2020 in terms of total phosphorus (TP) input.
Source: NIC, 2023
Table 4.
Total phosphorus (TP) input ceilings in tons per year for total river as well as the country contribution to each of the transboundary rivers.
| River | Basin# | NIC | Country | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE | FI | LT | LV | PL | RU | BY | CZ | UA | |||
| Nemunas | BAP | 913 | - | - | 628 | - | - | - | 285 | - | - |
| Barta | BAP | 25 | - | - | 5 | 20 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Venta | BAP | 106 | - | - | 20 | 86 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Lielupe | GUR | 302 | - | - | 135 | 167 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Daugava | GUR | 941 | - | - | 40 | 395 | - | 99 | 407 | - | - |
| Oder | BAP | 1554 | 132 | - | - | - | 1365 | - | - | 57 | - |
| Vistula | BAP | 2350 | - | - | - | - | 2240 | - | 63 | - | 47 |
| Pregolya | BAP | 147 | - | - | - | - | 51 | 96 | - | - | - |
| Neva | GUF | 1399 | - | 20 | - | - | - | 1379 | - | - | - |
Table 5.
Remaining phosphorus reduction country by basin in percentages of NIC by 2020.
| Country | Baltic Sea basin# | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOB | BOS | BAP | GUF | GUR | DS | KAT | |
| Denmark | n/a | n/a | 125 | n/a | n/a | - | - |
| Estonia | n/a | n/a | 117 | 39 | 36 | n/a | n/a |
| Finland | - | 8.0 | 107 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| Germany | n/a | n/a | 119 | n/a | n/a | - | n/a |
| Latvia | n/a | n/a | 66 | n/a | 24 | n/a | n/a |
| Lithuania | n/a | n/a | 55 | n/a | - | n/a | n/a |
| Poland | n/a | n/a | 114 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Russia | n/a | n/a | 151 | 35 | 26 | n/a | n/a |
| Sweden | 3.8 | - | 129 | n/a | n/a | - | - |
| Belarus | n/a | n/a | 148 | n/a | 61 | n/a | n/a |
| Czech Republic | n/a | n/a | 114 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Ukraine | n/a | n/a | 279 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Table 6.
Remaining phosphorus reduction country in tons by 2020.
| Country | Baltic Sea basin# | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOB | BOS | BAP | GUF | GUR | DS | KAT | |
| Denmark | n/a | n/a | 26 | n/a | n/a | - | - |
| Estonia | n/a | n/a | 11 | 88 | 67 | n/a | n/a |
| Finland | - | 100 | 338 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| Germany | n/a | n/a | 241 | n/a | n/a | - | n/a |
| Latvia | n/a | n/a | 111 | n/a | 255 | n/a | n/a |
| Lithuania | n/a | n/a | 388 | n/a | - | n/a | n/a |
| Poland | n/a | n/a | 4766 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Russia | n/a | n/a | 365 | 1010 | 25 | n/a | n/a |
| Sweden | 31 | - | 410 | n/a | n/a | - | - |
| Belarus | n/a | n/a | 518 | n/a | 248 | n/a | n/a |
| Czech Republic | n/a | n/a | 65 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Ukraine | n/a | n/a | 131 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Table 7.
Assessment of progress towards total phosphorus NIC by 2020 for Poland by Baltic Sea basins.
| Total N (TN) | Baltic Sea basin# | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOB | BOS | BAP | GUF | GUR | DS | KAT | |
| A: Input Ceiling (NIC BSAP2021) [t] | 4198 | ||||||
| B: Estimated input 2020 [t] | 8167 | ||||||
| C: Inputs 2020 [t] incl. uncertainty (test value) | 8964 | ||||||
| Extra reduction by 2020 (A-C) [t] | |||||||
| Remaining reduction to fulfill NIC by 2020 | 4766 | ||||||
| Remaining in % ceiling | 114 | ||||||
| Significant changes [%] since reference period to 2020 | −22 | ||||||
Table 8.
NIC assessment results of Poland for total phosphorus (TP) from Table 7 (taking into account extra reduction in neighboring basins) combined with the results of the PLC-7 (HELCOM by Sveden and Tornbjerg, 2022) source apportionment assessment for the main sources indicated for Poland.
Table 9.
Total phosphorus (TP) inputs to the Baltic Sea basins compared with detailed source apportionment. As in Table 8, but with a more detailed breakdown of sources.
| Baltic Sea basin# | Discharging into inland waters TP [%] | Discharging directly into the sea TP [%] | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGL | ATL | MFL | NBL | SCL | SWL | AQL | INL | MWL | AQL | INL | MWL | |
| BOB | ||||||||||||
| BOS | ||||||||||||
| BAP | 60 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 5.09 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 23 | 0 | 0.28 | 0.45 |
| GUF | ||||||||||||
| GUR | ||||||||||||
| DS | ||||||||||||
| KAT | ||||||||||||

Figure 5.
Structure of phosphorus loads at sources in five regions – absolute values.
MUN–municipal point sources, IND – industrial point sources, AQU – aquaculture, ATS – atmospheric deposition, TRS – transgenic cargo, SWS – overflows and surface runoff from urbanized areas, SCS – sewage from unsewered areas, AG – agriculture, ATS – direct atmospheric deposition MFS – commercial forests and wastelands, NBS – natural background TRS – cross-border cargo
Source: National Report, 2020

Figure 6.
The structure of river phosphorus loads in five regions – absolute values.
River loads from: MUN – municipal point sources, IND – industrial point sources, AQU – aquaculture, SWL – sewage from storm overflows of combined sewers and surface, subsurface and ground runoff from undeveloped areas (excluding loads from sanitary sewage from unsewered areas and from the natural background), SCL – sanitary sewage from non – sewered areas, ATS – atmospheric deposition, AGL – agriculture, ATL – atmospheric precipitation on the surface of inland waters, MFL forests and wastelands, NBL – natural background, TRL – transboundary sub – catchments outside Poland, UKL – unknown sources
Source: National Report, 2020

Figure 7.
Normalized phosphorus loads at sources from Polish part of the Baltic Sea catchment area in 2000, 2006, 2012, 2018
MUN – municipal point sources, IND – industrial point sources, AQU – aquaculture, SWS – overflows and surface runoff from urbanized areas, SCS – sewage from unsewered areas, AGS – agriculture, ATS – direct atmospheric deposition, MFS – commercial forests and wastelands, NBS – natural background, TRS – transgenic cargo, UNS – loads of unknown origin, D – direct, I – indirect
Source: National Report, 2020

Figure 8.
Normalized river loads of phosphorus from Polish part of the Baltic Sea catchment area in in 2000, 2006, 2012, 2018
River loads from: MUN – municipal point sources, IND – industrial point sources, MWL – municipal sewage treatment plants, INL – industrial sewage treatment plants, INL – industrial sewage treatment plants, FIL – aquaculture (salmon farming), SWL – sewage from storm overflows of combined sewers and surface, subsurface and ground runoff from undeveloped areas (sanitary sewage from unsewered areas and from the natural background), SCL – sanitary sewage from non-sewered areas, AGL – agriculture, ATL – atmospheric precipitation on the surface of inland waters, MFL – municipal sewage treatment plants, NBL – natural background, TRL – transgenic sub-catchments outside Poland, UNL – unknown sources, D – direct, I – indirect
Source: National Report, 2020