References
- Amaya, A., Presser, S., 2016. Nonresponse Bias for Univariate and Multivariate Estimates of Social Activities and Roles. Public Opinion Quarterly 81(1), 1–36.
- Barnes, J.C., Sketch, M., Gramza, A.R., Sorice, M.G., Iovanna, R., Dayer, A.A., 2020. Land use decisions after the Conservation Reserve Program: Re-enrollment, reversion, and persistence in the southern Great Plains. Conservation Science and Practice 2(9), e254.
- Brooks, M.E., Dalal, D.K., Nolan, K.P., 2014. Are common language effect sizes easier to understand than traditional effect sizes? Journal of Applied Psychology 99, 332–340.
- Cliff, N., 1993. Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychological Bulletin 114, 494–509.
- Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
- Coon, J.J., Van Riper, C.J., Morton, L.W., Miller, J.R., 2020. Evaluating Nonresponse Bias in Survey Research Conducted in the Rural Midwest. Society & Natural Resources 33, 968–986.
- Dayer, A.A., Lutter, S.H., Sesser, K.A., Hickey, C.M., Gardali, T., 2018. Private Landowner Conservation Behavior Following Participation in Voluntary Incentive Programs: Recommendations to Facilitate Behavioral Persistence: Facilitating landowner behavioral persistence. Conservation Letters 11, e12394.
- de Winter, J.F.C., Dodou, D., n.d. Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Addendum added October 2012). Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 15, Article 11.
- Delaney, H.D., Vargha, A., 2002. Comparing several robust tests of stochastic equality with ordinally scaled variables and small to moderate sized samples. Psychological Methods 7, 485–503.
- Farm Service Agency (FSA), USDA, 2022. Acres on Contracts Expiring Between 2018 – 2022 that Have Been Enrolled More than Once.
https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Conservation/PDF/Acres%20on%20Contracts%20Expiring%20Between%202018-2%20that%20Have%20Been%20Enrolled%20More%20than%20Once%20Sep%202017.pdf . Accessed 9/29/2023. - Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E., Richler, J.J., 2012. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141, 2–18.
- Groves, R.M., 2006. Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70, 646–675.
- Hellevik, O., 2016. Extreme nonresponse and response bias: A “worst case” analysis. Quality & Quantity 50, 1969–1991.
- Hendra, R., Hill, A., 2019. Rethinking Response Rates: New Evidence of Little Relationship Between Survey Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias. Evaluation Review 43, 307–330.
- Kassambara, A., 2022. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0.7.1, 2022.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix - Kirk, R.E., 1996. Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56, 746–759.
- Kloke, J., McKean, J.W., 2014. Nonparametric Statistical Methods Using R, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
- Liu, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, W., 2023. The influence of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program on local water quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 105, 27–51.
- Maher, A.T., Quintana Ashwell, N.E., Tanaka, J.A., Ritten, J.P., Maczko, K.A., 2023. Financial barriers and opportunities for conservation adoption on U.S. rangelands: A region-wide, ranch-level economic assessment of NRCS-sponsored Greater Sage-grouse habitat conservation programs. Journal of Environmental Management 329, 116420.
- Mangiafico, S.S., 2023a. rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. R package version 2.4.30, 2023.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcompanion - Mangiafico, S.S., 2023b. Two-sample Mann–Whitney U Test, in: Summary and Analysis of Extension Program Evaluation in R. Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Brunswick, NJ.
- McGraw, K.O., Wong, S.P., 1992. A common language effect size statistic. Psychological Bulletin 111, 361–365.
- Pathak, S., Paudel, K.P., Adusumilli, N.C., 2021. Impact of the Federal Conservation Program Participation on Conservation Practice Adoption Intensity in Louisiana, USA. Environmental Management 68, 1–16.
- Prokopy, L.S., Floress, K., Arbuckle, J.G., Church, S.P., Eanes, F.R., Gao, Y., Gramig, B.M., Ranjan, P., Singh, A.S., 2019. Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74, 520–534.
- R Core Team, 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R 4.2.2, 2022. Vienna, Austria.
https://www.R-project.org/ - Ranjan, P., Church, S.P., Floress, K., Prokopy, L.S., 2019. Synthesizing Conservation Motivations and Barriers: What Have We Learned from Qualitative Studies of Farmers' Behaviors in the United States? Society & Natural Resources 32, 1171–1199.
- Ruscio, J., 2008. A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods 13, 19–30.
- Skaggs, R.K., Kirksey, R.E., Harper, W.M., 1994. Determinants And Implication of Post-CRP Land Use Decisions. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(2), 299–312.
- Sweikert, L.A., Gigliotti, L.M., 2019a. Evaluating the role of Farm Bill conservation program participation in conserving America's grasslands. Land Use Policy 81, 392–399.
- Sweikert, L.A., Gigliotti, L.M., 2019b. Understanding conservation decisions of agriculture producers. The Journal of Wildlife Management 83, 993–1004.
- Torchiano, M., 2016. Effsize - a package for efficient effect size computation.
https://zenodo.org/record/196082 . - Vargha, A., Delaney, H.D., 2000. A Critique and Improvement of the “CL” Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25, 101.
- Wan, Z., Xia, X., Lo, D., Murphy, G.C., 2020. How does Machine Learning Change Software Development Practices? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 49, 1857–1871.