Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale Cover

Conflicts and resolutions in managing water allocation at the watershed scale

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E. and F. Herrera (2010): A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences. Journal of Information Sciences 180, 4477–4495.
  2. Amineh Z.B.A., Hashemian S.J. and A. Magholi (2017): Integrating spatial multi criteria decision making (SMCDM) with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for delineation of the most suitable areas for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). Journal of Hydrology 551, 577–595.
  3. Bezerra, F., Melo, P. and J.P. Costa (2014): Visual and interactive comparative analysis of individual opinions: a group decision support tool. Group Decision and Negotiation 23, 101–125.
  4. Blagojevic, B., Srdjevic B., Srdjevic, Z. and T. Zoranovic (2016): Heuristic aggregation of individual judgments in AHP group decision making using simulated annealing algorithm. Information Sciences 330, 260–273.
  5. Blagojevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Bezdan, A. and B. Srdjevic (2016): Group decision making in land evaluation for irrigation: A Case study from Serbia. Journal of Hydroinformatics 18, 579–598.
  6. Brandt, P., Kvakić, M., Butterbach-Bahl, K. and M.C. Rufino (2017): How to target climate-smart agriculture? Concept and application of the consensus-driven decision support framework “targetCSA”. Agricultural Systems 151, 234–245.
  7. DHI - Danish Hydraulic Institute (2004): MIKE-BASIN environment for integrated water resources management and planning. https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/products/mike-hydro-basin. Accessed on 6 May 2019.
  8. Dong, Q., Zhü, K. and O. Cooper (2017): Gaining consensus in a moderated group: A model with a twofold feedback mechanism. Expert Systems with Applications 71, 87–97.
  9. Hartmann, S., Martini, C. and J. Sprenger (2009): Consensual decision-making among epistemic peers. Episteme 6, 110–129.
  10. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Boelee, E., Cools, J., van Hoof, L., Hospes, O., Kok, M., Peerlings, J., van Tatenhove, J., Termeer, C.J.A.M. and I.J. Visseren-Hamakers (2018): Identifying barriers and levers of biodiversity mainstreaming in four cases of transnational governance of land and water. Environmental Science & Policy 85, 132–140.
  11. Labadie, J.W. (2015): MODSIM - Decision support system for integrated river basin management. Documentation and User Manual. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
  12. LabSid (2018): AcquaNet – River basin simulation model. User Manual. University of San Paulo, Brazil. http://www.labsid.eng.br/software.aspx?id=14. Accessed on 13 May 2019.
  13. Lehrer K. and C. Wagner (1981): Rational Consensus in Science and Society. Reidel, Dordrecht.
  14. Moreno-Jimenez, J.M., Aguaron, J. and M.T. Escobar (2008): The Core of Consistency in AHP-Group Decision Making. Group Decision Negotiations, 17, 249–265.
  15. Pluchinotta, I., Pagano, A., Giordano, R. and A. Tsoukiàs (2018): A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management. Journal of Environmental Management 223, 815–824.
  16. Regan, H.M., Colyvan, M. and L. Markovchick-Nicholls (2006): A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 80, 167–176.
  17. Saaty, T. (1980): Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York, USA.
  18. Sandoval-Solis, S., McKinney, D.C. and D.P. Loucks (2011): Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. Water Resources Planning and Management 2011, 381–390.
  19. Schardong, A. and S.P. Simonovic (2015): Coupled self-adaptive multiobjective differential evolution and network flow algorithm approach for optimal reservoir operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 141, 04015015.
  20. Srdjevic, B., Melo, P., Srdjevic, Z., Jorge, L. and T. Zoranovic (2019): Water allocation for agricultural users based on multi criteria analysis and use of decision-making tools. In: The Proceedings of the 47th International Symposium “Actual tasks on Agricultural Engineering”. 5–7 March 2019, Opatija, Croatia, pp. 117–126.
  21. Srdjevic, Z. and B. Srdjevic (2019): Multistakeholder conflicts and resolutions in water resources management. In: The Proceedings of the 47th International Symposium “Actual tasks on agricultural engineering”, Opatija, Croatia, 5–7 March 2019, 127–134.
  22. Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z. and M. Lakicevic (2018): Validating the importance of criteria for assessing climate change scenarios. Water and Climate Change 9, 570–583.
  23. Srđević, Z. and B. Srđević (2017): An extension of the sustainability index definition in water resources planning and management. Water Resources Management 31, 1695–1712.
  24. SEI - Stockholm Environment Institute (2018): WEAP – Water evaluation and planning system. https://www.weap21.org/. Accessed on 6 May 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5430 | Journal ISSN: 0006-5471
Language: English
Page range: 161 - 170
Submitted on: May 14, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 4, 2019
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Zorica Srdjevic, Bojan Srdjevic, Paulo Melo, Luísa Jorge, published by Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.