Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Weights of the strategies within one of the five subgroupsTabelle 2_ Gewichtung der Strategien innerhalb der fünf Untergruppen
| Strategy 1 | Strategy 2 | Strategy 3 | Strategy 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stakeholder1 | 0.393 | 0.239 | 0.175 | 0.193 |
| Stakeholder2 | 0.414 | 0.236 | 0.174 | 0.176 |
| Stakeholder3 | 0.411 | 0.249 | 0.204 | 0.136 |
| Stakeholder4 | 0.338 | 0.235 | 0.229 | 0.198 |
| Stakeholder5 | 0.334 | 0.219 | 0.226 | 0.220 |
| Consensus convergence weights | 0.366 | 0.233 | 0.212 | 0.190 |
The final weights of alternative water allocation strategiesTabelle 4_ Die entgültige Gewichtugn der alternativen Wasserzuteilungsstrategien
| Aggregation method | Strategy 1 | Strategy 2 | Strategy 3 | Strategy 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus convergence | 0.167 (4) | 0.204 (3) | 0.341 (1) | 0.285 (2) |
Priorities of water use within management strategies for the period 2016–2025 as decision alternative for water allocationTabelle 1_ Prioritäten der Wassernutzung innerhalb der Managementstrategien für die Periode 2016–2025 als Entscheidungsalternativen für die Wasserzuteilung
| Water uses category | Strategy 1 | Strategy 2 | Strategy 3 | Strategy 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR – Irrigation | Top | Medium | Medium | Low |
| DR – Drainage | Medium | Top | Low | Medium |
| UW – Used waters | Low | Low | Top | Low |
| IS – Industrial supply | Medium | Medium | Medium | Top |
| OP – Other purposes | Negligible | Low | Low | Negligible |
Subgroups consensus weights for strategiesTabelle 3_ Konsensgewichte der Untergruppen für die Strategien
| Strategy/Subgroups | Strategy 1 | Strategy 2 | Strategy 3 | Strategy 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subgroup 1 | 0.366 | 0.233 | 0.212 | 0.190 |
| Subgroup 2 | 0.132 | 0.222 | 0.421 | 0.225 |
| Subgroup 3 | 0.187 | 0.304 | 0.310 | 0.199 |
| Subgroup 4 | 0.128 | 0.163 | 0.304 | 0.405 |
| Subgroup 5 | 0.156 | 0.161 | 0.386 | 0.297 |