Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Content and Implementation of the Right to Annual Leave: Analysis Based on the Case Study of Lithuania Cover

Content and Implementation of the Right to Annual Leave: Analysis Based on the Case Study of Lithuania

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1. Blooma, Jessica de, Sabine A.E. Geurtsa, Toon W. Tarisa, Sabine Sonnentaga, Carolina de Weertha, and Michiel A.J. Kompiera. “Effects of vacation from work on health and well-being: Lots of fun, quickly gone.” An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations 24 (2) (2010): 196-216 // DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2010.493385.10.1080/02678373.2010.493385
  2. 2. Bogg, Alan. “Article 31”: 833-868. In: Hervey Peers and Ward Kenner, eds. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A commentary. Beck-Nomos-Hart, 2014.
  3. 3. Council of Europe. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights. December 2018.
  4. 4. Council of Europe. Digest of the Case Law of the European Committee of Social Rights. September 2008.
  5. 5. Davulis, Tomas. Comment on Labor Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Vilnius: Centre of Registers, 2018.
  6. 6. Green, Francis. “Union Recognition and Paid Holiday Entitlement.” BJIR 35 (2) (1997): 243-255 // DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00050.10.1111/1467-8543.00050
  7. 7. Kilpatrick, Claire. “Article 21”: 579-604. In: Hervey Peers and Ward Kenner, eds. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A commentary (Beck-Nomos-Hart, 2014).
  8. 8. Syrek, Christine J., Oliver Weigelt, Jana Kühnel, and Jessica de Bloom. “All I want for Christmas is recovery – changes in employee affective well-being before and after vacation.” An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations 32 (4) (2018): 313-333 // DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2018.1427816.10.1080/02678373.2018.1427816
  9. 1. AA v UAB “Lautra Motors”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2008, no 3K-3-437.
  10. 2. B.B. v. UAB “Keback Vilnius”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2012, no 3K-7-149.
  11. 3. Bundesurlaubsgesetz (The Federal Law on leave) of 8 January 1963, as amended on 7 May 2002. BGBl. 1963, p. 2.; BGBl. 2002 I, p. 1529.
  12. 4. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407.
  13. 5. Concepción Maestre García v Centros Comerciales Carrefour SA. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013 no C-194/12.
  14. 6. Decision of the Kaunas district court of 21 September 2017. Civil case no. e2A-1471-259/2017.
  15. 7. Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time. OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9–19.
  16. 8. European Social Charter of the Council of Europe (Turin, 18.X.1961), (Revised). Strasbourg, 3.V.1996.
  17. 9. Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v. Staat der Nederlanden. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2006, no C-124/05.
  18. 10. Gerhard Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund and Stringer and Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2006, no C-350/06 and no C-520/06.
  19. 11. Hans Maschek v. Magistratsdirektion der Stadt Wien – Personalstelle Wiener Stadtwerk. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2016, no C-341/15. https://rm.coe.int/168007cf93.
  20. 12. KHS AG v Winfried Schulte. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, no C-214/10.
  21. 13. L.D. v UAB “Alzida”. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017, no e3k-3-405-1075.
  22. 14. Labour Code of the Republic of Lithuania. TAR, 2016, no 23709.
  23. 15. Law on Occupational Safety and Health of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2003, no 70-3170.
  24. 16. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v. Tetsuji Shimizu. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2018, no C-684/16 (Opinion of AG Bot.).
  25. 17. On remuneration of the mayor and its deputy and on their leave. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 2013, no 50/2010.
  26. 18. R. B. v. UAB “Semitransa”. Vilnius Regional Court, Chamber of Trakai, 2016, no 2-964-983.
  27. 19. R.K. v “Pico line”. Kaunas district court, 2018, no e2A-1339-773.
  28. 20. The Employment Rights (Employment Particulars and Paid Annual Leave) (Amendment) Regulations. 2018, no. 1378 // http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/1378/contents/made.
  29. 21. V.A. v “Miesto šiluma”. Kaunas district court, 2017, no e2A-1471-259.
  30. 22. Vicente Pereda v. M. M. SA. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2009, no C-277/08.
  31. 23. Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v. Land Tirol. Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, no C-486/08.
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 96
Submitted on: May 25, 2019
|
Accepted on: Dec 23, 2019
|
Published on: Mar 12, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Ingrinda Mačernytė-Panomariovienė, Vilius Mačiulaitis, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.