References
- 1. Acker R., Costa F., Bourdeaudhuij I., Cardon G., Haerens L. (2010) Sex equity and physical activity levels in coeducational physical education: Exploring the potential of modified game forms. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy, 15(2): 159-173.
- 2. Cockburn C. (2001) Year 9 girls and physical education: A survey of pupil perceptions. The Bulletin of Physical Education, 37(1): 5-24.
- 3. DeAngelo L.P., Kalumuck K.P., Adlin E.M. (2015) Obesity. Magill’S Medical Guide (Online Edition).
- 4. Deci E., Ryan R. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq., 11(4): 227-268.
- 5. Derry J., Phillips D. (2004) Comparisons of selected student and teacher variables in all-girls and coeducational physical education environments. Physical Educator, 61(1): 23-25.
- 6. Fennema E., Sherman J.A. (1976) Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6: 31.
- 7. Griffin P. (1985) Girls’ and boys’ participation styles in middle school physical education team sport classes: A description and practical applications. The Physical Educator, 42(1): 3-8.
- 8. Hannon J., Ratliffe T. (2005) Physical activity levels in coeducational and single-gender high school physical education settings. J. Teach. Phys. Educ., 24(2): 149-164.
- 9. Hannon J., Williams S. (2008) Should secondary physical education be coeducational or single-sex?, J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance, 79(2): 6-56.
- 10. Heart Rate Training & Technology| Heart Zones USA, (2015) Retrieved November 12, 2015, from http://www.heartzones.com/.
- 11. Hill G., Cleven B. (2005) A comparison of 9th grade male and female physical education activities preferences and support for coeducational groupings. Physical Educator, 62(4): 187-197.
- 12. Kahan D., McKenzie T.L. (2015) The potential and reality of physical education in controlling overweight and obesity. Am. J. Public Health, 105(4): 653.
- 13. Kulinna P., Martin J., Lai, Q., Kliber A., Reed B. (2003) Student physical activity patterns: Grade, gender, and activity influences. J. Teach. Phys. Educ., 298-310.
- 14. Lirgg C.D. (1993). Effects of same-sex versus coeducational physical education on the self-perceptions of middle and high school students. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 64: 324-334.
- 15. Lyu M., Gill D., (2011) Perceived physical competence enjoyment and effort in same-sex and coeducational physical education classes. Educational Psychology, 31(2): 247-260.
- 16. McKenzie T., Prochaska J., Sallis J., LaMaster K., (2004) Coeducational and single-sex physical education in middle schools: Impact on physical activity. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 75: 446-449.
- 17. Murphy B., Dionigi R.A., Litchfield C. (2014) Physical education and female participation: A case study of teachers’ perspectives and strategies. Issues Educ. Res., 24(3): 241-259.
- 18. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2003). What constitutes a quality physical education program [Position statement]. Reston, VA: Author.
- 19. Osbourne K., Bauer A., Sutliff M. (2002) Middle school students’ perceptions of coed versus non-coed physical education. Physical Educator, 59(2): 83-89.
- 20. Pritchard T., McCollum S., Sundal J., Colquit G. (2014) Effect of the sport education tactical model on coeducational and single gender game performance. Physical Educator, 71(1): 132-154.
- 21. Rowe K. (1988) Single-sex and mixed-sex classes: The effects of class type on student achievement, confidence, and participation in mathematic. Aust. J. Educ., 32: 180-202.
- 22. Slingerland M., Haerens L., Cardon G., Borghouts L. (2014) Differences in perceived competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball game play in middle school physical education. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev., 20(1): 20.
- 23. StataCorp. (2015) Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
- 24. Stidder G. (2000) Does Sex Matter? Pupil perceptions of physical education in mixed and single sex secondary schools. Br. J. Teach. Phys. Educ., 31(3): 40-44.
- 25. Title IX athletics. [electronic resource]: Accommodating interests and abilities: A briefing before the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC. (2010). Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 2010.
- 26. Turvey J., Laws C. (1988) Are girls losing out? The effects of mixed-sex grouping on girls’ performance in physical education. Br. J. Phys. Educ., 19(6): 253-255.
- 27. Van Acker R., da Costa F.C., Bourdeaudhuij I.D., Cardon G., Haerens L. (2010) Sex equity and physical activity levels in coeducational physical education: exploring the potential of modified game forms. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy, 15(2): 159-173.
- 28. Williams S.M., Hannon J.C. (2018) Physical Activity Levels in Coed and Same-Sex Physical Education Using the Tactical Games Model. The Physical Educator, 75(3): 525-545.
- 29. World Health Organization. (2021, March 8). Obesity and Overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight