Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Disparities in Global Education: Curriculum Delivery and Learning Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers in Rural Contexts Cover

Digital Disparities in Global Education: Curriculum Delivery and Learning Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers in Rural Contexts

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Ajani, O. (2025). Exploring the impact of the teacher education curriculum on 21st-century skill development among pre-service teachers at a selected rural university. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 1-20. Retrieved from https://journal.spera.asn.au/index.php/AIJRE/article/view/795
  2. Ajani, O. A., & Govender, S. (2024). The relevance of curriculum for pre-service teachers in addressing dynamic classroom changes in South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(5), 821-829. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3350
  3. Ajani, O. A., & Govender, S. (2025). Evaluating the impact of professional development programmes on curriculum design and implementation for sustainability education in high schools: A scoping review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 7(s1), a01-a01. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.s1.01
  4. Ajani, O. A., & Ntombela, S. (2025). Advancing inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities in preparing pre-service teachers to support students with disabilities. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 14, 25-41. https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.14.25-41
  5. Ajani, O. A., & Rathilal, S. (2025). Exploring design thinking for innovation in higher education: A comprehensive review of varied influential factors. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 12(1), 21-32.
  6. Ajani, O., Gamede, B., & Govender, S. (2025). Cultural and ethical dimensions of learning management system adoption in rural universities: Exploring data privacy, algorithmic bias, and contextual realities. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. Retrieved from https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/msj/article/view/10045
  7. Aldekheel, A. Y., Khalil, O., & AlQenaei, Z. M. (2022). Factors impacting educators’ continued IT adoption in precollege education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 465-500. https://doi.org/10.28945/5029
  8. Al-zboon, H. S., Gasaymeh, A. M., & Al-Rsa’i, M. S. (2021). The attitudes of science and mathematics educators toward the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) in their educational practice: The application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). World Journal of Education, 11(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v11n1p75
  9. Apuke, O. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.12816/0040336
  10. Ardiç, M. A. (2021). Opinions and attitudes of secondary school mathematics educators towards technology. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.58.8.3
  11. Avci, S. (2022). Examining the factors affecting educators’ use of digital learning resources with UTAUT2. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 200-214. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2022.10.3.399
  12. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2016). Multivariate Analyse Methoden. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46076-4
  13. Bardakcı, S., & Alkan, M. F. (2019). Investigation of Turkish preservice educators’ intentions to use IWB in terms of technological and pedagogical aspects. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2887-2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09904-4
  14. Bećirović, S. (2023). Challenges and barriers for effective integration of technologies into teaching and learning. In S. Bećirović (Ed.), Digital Pedagogy: The Use of Digital Technologies in Contemporary Education (pp. 123-133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_10
  15. Brookes, E. (2023). The theory of planned behavior: Behavioral intention. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/theory-of-planned-behavior.html
  16. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press.
  17. Cirneanu, A. L., & Moldoveanu, C. E. (2024). Use of digital technology in integrated mathematics education. Applied System Innovation, 7(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7040066
  18. De Jesus, N. M., Castro, E. T., & Buyan, C. A. (2023). Acceptance analysis of IWB systems in education using UTAUT2 model: The moderating role of perceived technological innovations. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (pp. 269-274). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193662
  19. De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
  20. Diseko, R., & Mashiteng, E. (2020). The experiences of mathematics educators in the use of smartboards. In Proceedings of the SITE Interactive Conference (pp. 456-462). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10210/446429
  21. Dlamini, R. (2022). Factors constraining teacher integration of ICT in Gauteng schools. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 17(2), 28-43.
  22. El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8
  23. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Educator beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  24. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  25. Field, A. (2018). Review of Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  27. Gaillard, C. (2019). Finding the missing variables: A systematic review of mathematics improvement strategies for South African public schools. South African Journal of Education, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n3a1582
  28. Geriş, A., & Özdener, N. (2021). The illusions on digital citizenship: What we know and what we do? Acta Educationis Generalis, 11(3), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2021-0024
  29. Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746
  30. Govender, S., Ajani, O. A., Ndaba, N. H., & Ngema, T. (2023). Making in-service professional development effective in a rural context. Contextualising Rural Education in South African Schools, 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004547025_006
  31. Graham, M. A., Mokgwathi, M. S., & De Villiers, J. J. R. (2021). Safety factors associated with mathematics achievement in South African schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2052. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11416
  32. Graham, M. A., Stols, G., & Kapp, R. (2020). Educator practice and integration of ICT: Why are or aren’t South African educators using ICTs in their classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 749-766. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13251a
  33. Grujicic, S., & Nikolic, A. (2021). Cross-section studies: Advantages and disadvantages. Zdravstvena Zaštita, 50, 44. https://doi.org/10.5937/zdravzast50-35574
  34. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson-Prentice Hall.
  35. Hodges, C. B., & Prater, A. H. (2014). Technologies on the horizon: Educators respond to the horizon report. TechTrends, 58(3), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0754-5
  36. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  37. Jarrah, A. M., Fayez, K., Almarashdi, H., & Fidalgo, P. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education in the UAE: Elementary educators’ views on distance education methods. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep516. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14714
  38. Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. G., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500-2
  39. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice educators’ intention to use technology: TPACK, educator self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.
  40. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  41. Kankaraš, M., & Capecchi, S. (2024). Neither agree nor disagree: Use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales. METRON. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5
  42. Kim, J. H. (2023). Cross-sectional study: The role of observation in epidemiological studies. In A. K. Mitra (Ed.), Statistical Approaches for Epidemiology: From concept to application (pp. 19-42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41784-9_2
  43. Limayem, M., & Hirt, S. G. (2003). Force of habit and information systems usage: Theory and initial validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00030
  44. Liu, J., Dai, Q., & Chen, J. (2024). Factors affecting teachers’ use of digital resources for teaching mathematical cultures: An extended UTAUT-2 model. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13105-z
  45. Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining educators’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in teaching of mathematics: An extended TAM model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep298. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9709
  46. Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence as a learning tool in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 7(1), a01. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.1.01
  47. Masango, M. M., Van Ryneveld, L., & Graham, M. A. (2022). A paperless classroom: Importance of training and support in the implementation of electronic textbooks in Gauteng public schools. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2320
  48. Matemera, S. (2020). Smart Board Use and Pedagogic Practices among Educators: A Case of a South African Township School (Doctoral dissertation). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  49. Mihai, M. A. (2020). The use of interactive whiteboards in urban Gauteng classrooms. Perspectives in Education, 38(2), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v38.i2.21
  50. Minty, R., & Moll, I. (2020). Gauteng paperless classrooms: Fantasy, fiction, or reality? Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/7323
  51. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for educator knowledge. The Educators College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  52. Mlambo, S., Rambe, P., & Schlebusch, L. (2020). Effects of Gauteng province’s educators’ ICT self-efficacy on their pedagogical use of ICTS in classrooms. Heliyon, 6(4), e03730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03730
  53. Mokoena, M. M., Simelane-Mnisi, S., & Mji, A. (2022). Challenges and solutions for educators’ use of interactive whiteboards in high schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2022.100104
  54. Msimango W. N., Kok, E. C. A., Xulu, S. C. B., & Ajani, O. A. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ practicum in grade r: Insights from South Africa. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 3(47). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30092024/8239
  55. Muchowe, R. M., & Mubango, H. (2025). E-learning in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: Implications on inclusive education for learners living with disabilities. Acta Educationis Generalis, 15(2), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2025-0020
  56. Ndlovu, M., & Meyer, D. (2019). Readiness of educators to teach mathematics with technology: A case study of a school in Gauteng. In Proceedings from the 63rd International Council on Education and Teaching Conference (pp. 188-197).
  57. Netsianda, A., & Ramaila, S. (2021). The use of ICT in mathematics teaching and learning in South African secondary schools. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN21 (pp. 623-632). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0173
  58. Njiku, J., Mutarutinya, V., & Maniraho, J. F. (2021). Building mathematics educators’ TPACK through collaborative lesson design activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep297. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9686
  59. Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics educators and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512515
  60. Padayachee, K. (2017). A snapshot survey of ICT integration in South African schools. South African Computer Journal, 29(2), 36-65. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v29i2.463
  61. Palinkas, L. A., et al. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  62. Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education - A educator’s perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1845. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7803
  63. Plageras, A., Kalovrektis, K., Xenakis, A., & Vavougios, D. (2023). The application of TPACK in the methodology of the flipped classroom and with the evaluation of the UTAUT to measure the impact of STEM activities in improving the understanding of concepts of applied sciences. In Proceedings from the 15th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 569-575). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.0243
  64. Pultoo, A., Bullee, A., Meunier, J. N., Sheoraj, K., Panchoo, S., Naseeven, P., Ujoodha, M., Roocha, V., Rajcoomar, H., & Oojorah, A. (2020). Classe21: Educators’ acceptance of technology-enhanced classroom using the UTAUT model. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 14(1), 39-48.
  65. Reddy, V., Juan, A., Isdale, K., & Fongwa, S. (2019). Mathematics achievement and the inequality gap: TIMSS 1995 to 2015. In N. Spaull, & J. Jansen (Eds.), South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Policy Implications of Research in Education (Vol. 10, pp. 169-187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_9
  66. Saal, P. E., & Graham, M. A. (2023). Comparing the use of educational technology in mathematics education between South African and German schools. Sustainability, 15(6), 4798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064798
  67. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice educators. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  68. Spangenberg, E. D., & De Freitas, G. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ levels of technological pedagogical content knowledge and information and communication technology integration barriers. Pythagoras, 40(1), a431. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v40i1.431
  69. Stols, G., Ferreira, R., Van der Merwe, A., De Villiers, C., Venter, S., Pelser, A., & Olivier, W. A. (2015). Perceptions and needs of South African mathematics teachers concerning their use of technology for instruction. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1209
  70. Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2023). Multicollinearity: An overview and introduction of ridge PLS-SEM estimation. In H. Latan, F. F. Hair Jr, & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications (pp. 183-207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37772-3_7
  71. Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among educator educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Educator Education, 79, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
  72. Tang, X., Yuan, Z., Deng, X., & Xiang, L. (2023). Predicting secondary school mathematics educators’ digital teaching behavior using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Electronic Research Archive, 31(10), 6274-6302. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2023318
  73. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  74. Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Çubukçu, Z., & Beauchamp, G. (2021). A new model for the factors that affect interactive whiteboard usage of educators and its effect on performance. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3575-3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10428-z
  75. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  76. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  77. Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
  78. Wieber, F., Thürmer, J. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Promoting the translation of intentions into action by implementation intentions: Behavioral effects and physiological correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00395
  79. Wijaya, T. T., & Weinhandl, R. (2022). Factors influencing students’ continuous intentions for using microlectures in the post-COVID-19 period: A modification of the UTAUT-2 approach. Electronics, 11(13), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924
  80. Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Bernard, M., Rahmadi, I. F., Lavicza, Z., & Surjono, H. D. (2022a). Factors influencing microgame adoption among secondary school mathematics educators supported by structural equation modelling-based research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952549
  81. Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Weinhandl, R., Yusron, E., & Lavicza, Z. (2022b). Applying the UTAUT model to understand factors affecting micro-lecture usage by mathematics educators in China. Mathematics, 10(7), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071008
  82. Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., Houghton, T., Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., & Yusop, F. D. (2022c). Factors affecting the use of digital mathematics textbooks in Indonesia. Mathematics, 10(11), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111808
  83. Yildiz, E., & Arpaci, I. (2024). Understanding pre-service mathematics teachers’ intentions to use GeoGebra: The role of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18817-18838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12614-1
  84. Yuan, Z., Deng, X., Ding, T., Liu, J., & Tan, Q. (2023a). Factors influencing secondary school educators’ usage behavior of dynamic mathematics software: A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Electronic Research Archive, 31(9), 5649-5684. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2023287
  85. Yuan, Z., Liu, J., Deng, X., Ding, T., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023b). Facilitating conditions as the biggest factor influencing elementary school educators’ usage behavior of dynamic mathematics software in China. Mathematics, 11(6), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061536
  86. Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Wijaya, T. T. (2022). Determinants of behavioral intention and use of interactive whiteboard by K-12 educators in remote and rural areas. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934423
  87. Zulu, M. W. (2020). An exploration of the integration of technology by mathematics educators: The case of 10 schools in KwaZulu-Natal under Umlazi District (Doctoral dissertation). Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Language: English
Page range: 16 - 37
Submitted on: Aug 3, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 25, 2025
Published on: Jun 13, 2026
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani, Nontobeko P. Khumalo, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.