References
- Ascalon, M. E., Meyers, L. S., Davis, B. W. & Smits, N. (2007). Distractor similarity and item-stem structure: Effects on item difficulty Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 153-170.
- Arends, F., Winnaar, L., & Mosimege, M. (2017). Teacher classroom practices and mathematics performance in south African schools: A reflection on TIMSS 2011. South African Journal of Education, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1362
- Arhin, A. K., & Yamoah, J. (2023). Identifying item flaws to improve the quality of core mathematics multiple-choice items. Journal of African Education, 4(3), 247-274.
- Arhin, A. K., Essuman, J., & Arhin, E. (2021). Analysis of item writing flaws in a communications skills test in a Ghanaian University. African Journal of Teacher Education, 10(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v10i2.6762
- Board, C., & Whitney, D. R. (1972). The effect of selected poor item-writing practices on test difficulty, reliability, and validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9(3), 225-233.
- Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33-63. https:doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_2
- Brown, A. S., Schilling, H. E., & Hockensmith, M. L. (1999). The negative suggestion effect: Pondering incorrect alternatives may be hazardous to your knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 756-764. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.756
- Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Goode, M. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2006). When additional multiple-choice lures aid versus hinder later memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 941-956. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1239
- Dave, N., Owen, R. B., Pursel. B., & Giles, C. L., (2021). Math multiple choice question solving and distractor generation with attentional GRU networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM21) (pp. 422-430). International Educational Data Mining Society. Retrieved from https://educationaldatamining.org/edm2021/
- Etsey, Y. K. (1997). Teachers’ and school administrators’ perspectives and use of standardized achievement tests: A review of published research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
- Goodrich, H. C. (1977). Distractor efficiency in foreign language testing. TESOL Quarterly, 11(1), 69-78.
- Gierl, M. J., Bulut, O., Guo, Q., & Zhang, X. (2017). Developing, analyzing, and using distractors for multiple-choice tests in education: A comprehensive review. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1082-1116.
- Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1993). How many options is enough for a multiple-choice test item? Educational and Psychological Measurement 53(4), 999-1010.
- Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriquez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309-334.
- Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hambleton, R. K., & Jirka, S. J. (2006). Anchor-based methods for judgmentally estimating item statistics. In S. M. Downing, & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 399-420.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Hubbard, R. (2001). The why and how of getting rid of conventional examinations. Quaestiones Mathematicae Supply, 1, 57-64.
- King, K. V., Gardner, D. A., Zucker, S., & Jorgensen, M. A. (2004). The distractor rationale taxonomy: Enhancing multiple-choice items in reading and mathematics. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
- Koepf, T. M., (2018). The Effect of Item Stem and Response Option Length on the Item Analysis Outcomes of a Career and Technical Education Multiple Choice Assessment (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3366
- Massachusetts Department of Education. (1987). The Massachusetts Educational Assessment Program. Quincy: Massachusetts Department of Education.
- Niss, M. (1993). Investigations into assessment in mathematics education. An ICMI Study. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Parkes, J., & Zimmaro, D. (2016). Learning and assessing with multiple-choice questions in college classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Popham, W. J. (2000). Educational Measurement (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4, 1301013.
- Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
- Romberg, T. A. (1992). Mathematics Assessment and Evaluation, Imperatives for Mathematics Educators. State University of New York.
- Stiggins, R., & DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the power of formative assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 640-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000907
- Susanti, Y., Tokunaga, T., Nishikawa, H., & Obari, H. (2018). Automatic distractor generation for multiple-choice English vocabulary questions. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 15.
- Tarrant, M., Knierim, A., Hayes, S. K., & Ware, J. (2006). The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high-stakes nursing assessments. Nurse Education Today, 6(6), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.006
- Tarrant, M., Ware. J., & Mohammed, A. M. (2009). An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: A descriptive analysis. BMC Medical Education, 9, 40.
- Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Fitzpatrick, A. R. (1989). Multiple‐choice models: The distractors are also part of the item. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 161-176.
- Vyas, R., & Supe A. (2008). Multiple choice questions: A literature review on the optimal number of options. National Medical Journal of India, 21(3),130-133. PMID: 19004145.
- Wesman, A. G. (1971). Writing the test item. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement (2nd ed.) (pp. 81-129). Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education.
- Wood, T. J. (2009). The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees. Advances in Health Sciences Education 14, 465-473. https://doi.or/10.1007/s10459-008-9129-z
- Zhang, C., Yicheng, S., Chen, H., & Wang, J. (2020). Generating adequate distractors for multiple-choice. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2020)-1 (pp. 310-315). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010148303100315