Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Opinions of Music Education Department Students on Web 2.0 Tools: The Case of Bursa Uludag University Cover

Opinions of Music Education Department Students on Web 2.0 Tools: The Case of Bursa Uludag University

Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. Adigüzel, A. (2010). The status of instructional technology in the primary schools and classroom teachers’ level of using these technologies. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 1-17.
  2. Akbana, Y. E., & Dikilitaş, K. (2022). EFL teachers’ sources of remote teaching anxiety: Insights and implications for EFL teacher education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 12(1), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2022-0009
  3. Altıok, S., Yükseltürk, E., & Üçgel, M. (2017). Web 2.0 eğitimine yönelik gerçekleştirilen bilimsel bir etkinliğin değerlendirilmesi: katılımcı görüşleri. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 6(1), 1-8.
  4. Aytan, T., & Başal, A. (2015). Investigation of the perceptions of pre-service Turkish teachers towards web 2.0 tools. Turkish Studies, 10(7), 149-166.
  5. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28.
  6. Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2007). The ‘Digital Native’ and ‘Digital Immigrant’: A Dangerous Opposition [Conference presentation]. Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE), Brighton, United Kingdom.
  7. Başal, A., & Eryılmaz, A. (2021). Engagement and affection of pre-service teachers in online learning in the context of COVID 19: engagement-based instruction with web 2.0 technologies vs direct transmission instruction. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 131-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1841555
  8. Bugawa, A. M., & Mirzal, A. (2018). The impact of Web 2.0 technologies on the learning experience of students in higher education: A review. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 1-17.
  9. Can, B. (2021). Fen bilimleri dersinde web 2.0 destekli kavramsal karikatür kullanımının akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi [Master’s Thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
  10. Choy, S. C., & San Oo, P. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom?. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.
  11. Coutinho, C., & Mota, P. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies in music education in Portugal: Using podcasts for learning. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.552043
  12. Cumhur, F., & Çam, S. S. (2021). Digital transformation in assessment and evaluation course: The effects of web 2.0 tools. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370559
  13. Crawford, R. (2013). Evolving technologies require educational policy change: Music education for the 21st century. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 717-734.
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2020). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  15. Çalışkan, S., Güney, Z., Sakhieva, R., Vasbieva, D., & Zaitseva, N. (2019). Teachers’ views on the availability of web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(22), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i22.11752
  16. Dikbaş Torun, E. (2020). Educational use of social media in higher education: Gender and social networking sites as the predictors of consuming, creating, and sharing content. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(2), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0013
  17. Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ELearn, 10, 1.
  18. Echeng, R., & Usoro, A. (2016). Enhancing the use of web 2.0 technologies in higher education: students’ and lectures’ views. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 25(1), 89-106.
  19. Erdoğan, F. (2020). The relationship between prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ critical thinking skills and reflective thinking skills. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 220-241. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1
  20. Faboya, O. T., & Adamu, B. J. (2017). Integrating web 2.0 tools into teaching and learning process through mobile device technology in Nigerian schools: current status and future directions. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(5), 113-124.
  21. Gündüzalp, C. (2021). Web 2.0 araçları ile zenginleştirilmiş çevrimiçi öğrenmenin öğrencilerin üst bilişsel ve yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 10(3), 1158-1177.
  22. Gürleroğlu, L., & Yıldırım, M. (2022). Investigation of secondary school students’ views on web 2.0 supported educational web site. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 191-217.
  23. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  24. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47-64.
  25. Jarrah, M. A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2021). Arab postgraduates’ readiness towards and effectiveness of utilizing web 2.0 in language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14141a
  26. Karadağ, B. F., & Garip, S. (2021). Use of learning apps as a web 2.0 application in Turkish teaching. Journal of Child, Literature and Language Education (JCLLE), 4(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.47935/ceded.897374
  27. Kekeç Morkoç, D., & Erdönmez, C. (2015). The effect of web 2.0 technology in the training processes: the sample of vocational school of Çanakkale social sciences. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 5(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.135
  28. Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
  29. Kocasaraç, H. (2003). Bilgisayarların öğretim alanında kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen yeterlilikleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 77-86.
  30. Kozikoğlu, I. (2019). Investigating critical thinking in prospective teachers: Metacognitive skills, problem solving skills and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 111-130.
  31. Kulaklı, A., & Mahony, S. (2014). Knowledge creation and sharing with web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning roles in so-called university 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 648-657.
  32. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902921949
  33. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software? O’Railly.
  34. Parkita, E. (2021). Digital tools of universal music education. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2021/3/1/9352
  35. Polat, S. (2020). Multidimensional analysis of the teaching process of the critical thinking skills. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.8
  36. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
  37. Revenko, V. (2021). Education and music culture in the context of web 2.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(10), 96-107.
  38. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Walker, W. L. (2009). Web 2.0 technologies: Facilitating interaction in an online human services counseling skills course. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 27(3), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830903093031
  39. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802370997
  40. Sastre, J., Cerdà, J., García, W., Hernández, C. A., Lloret, N., Murillo, A., Picó, D., Serrano, J. E., Scarani, S., & Dannenberg, R. B. (2013). New technologies for music education. In 2013 Second international conference on E-learning and E-technologies in education (ICEEE) (pp. 149–154). Lodz, Poland. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644364
  41. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776
  42. Süğümlü, Ü., & Aslan, S. (2022). The use of web 2.0 tools in mother-tongue instruction: teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 10(1), 124-137.
  43. Şahin Topalcengiz, E., & Yıldırım, B. (2020). Teachers’ opinions about distance web 2.0 tools training and teachers’ in-class web 2.0 practices. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 561-577.
  44. Taghva, F., Rezaei, N., Ghaderi, J., & Taghva, R. (2014). Studying the relationship between critical thinking skills and students’ educational achievement (Eghlid Universities as case study). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 25, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.18
  45. Tulaboev, A., & Oxley, A. (2012). A case study on using web 2.0 social networking tools in higher education. 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 1, 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297217
  46. Tünkler, V. (2021). Web 2.0 Araçlarıyla grafik materyalleri deneyimlemek: Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 53, 234-260.
  47. Uça Güneş, E. P. (2016). Toplumsal değişim, teknoloji ve eğitim ilişkisinde sosyal ağların yeri. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 2(2), 191-206. Uzunkavak, M. Ç., & Gül, G. (2022). The contribution of the activities prepared with
  48. Web 2.0 technologies to the level of learning. GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal, 24, 95-117.
  49. Wu, M. (2022). A music teaching resource management model based on fuzzy clustering algorithm. Mobile Information Systems, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3469869
  50. Xu, J. (2011). The application of critical thinking in teaching English reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(2), 136-141.
  51. Yıldırım Taştı, Ö., & Yıldırım, A. (2022). Critical thinking skills and dispositions of Turkish pre-service teachers: A systematic review of research. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(3), 561-604. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1062721
  52. Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Yuen, P. K. (2011). Perceptions, interest, and use: teachers and web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 109-123.
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 67
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2022
|
Accepted on: Apr 18, 2023
|
Published on: Nov 15, 2023
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2023 Ajda Şenol Sakin, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.